Generating matrix of evidence

loading

A unique feature of Epistemonikos is that it connects systematic reviews and their included studies. This allows clustering systematic reviews based on the primary studies they have in common. The concept of 'systematic reviews sharing included studies' is a proxy of 'systematic reviews answering a similar question'.

A matrix of evidence is a tabular way of displaying the cluster of systematic reviews that share included studies, and all the studies included in these reviews. It is automatically created based on the connections of the database, and can be trimmed by the user in order to reflect an accurate body of evidence for a specific question.

This tool allows you to create your own matrix.
It will be saved in your account, and will not be visible to other users

The matrix that will be created from this review contains Systematic reviews / Primary studies. loading

loading See the Matrix as a table (Recommended) See the Matrix as a list of documents (Recommended)

The matrix of evidence is created based on the primary studies that systematic reviews have in common. For this reason it is not possible to generate a matrix of evidence from an empty review (i.e. a review that did not include any study)

This matrix will not be available until Epistemonikos collaborators finish uploading all the relevant information. If you want them to prioritize this review send an email to matrix@epistemonikos.org

Back to review

Loading... loading
7 Primary studies Studify 28.6%Randomized controlled trial (RCT)2 / 7
de Korte N2012Hjern F2007Estrada Ferrer ..2016Daniels L2017Brochmann ND2016Chabok A2012Isacson D2014
10 Systematic reviews
Mocanu V2018Morris AM2014Mege D2019Huston JM2018Au S2019Emile SH2018Desai M2019de Korte N2011van Dijk ST2020Tandon A2018
10 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Symptomatic Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Diverticulitis: A Prospective Cohort Study

blocked
Journal Diseases of the colon and rectum
Year 2016
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Even though evidence for nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis exists, it has not gained widespread adoption. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective single-arm study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of symptomatic (nonantibiotic) treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis during a 30-day follow-up period. DESIGN: This study is a single-arm prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02219698). SETTINGS: This study was performed at an academic teaching hospital functioning as both a tertiary and secondary care referral center. PATIENTS: Patients, who had CT-verified uncomplicated acute colonic diverticulitis (including diverticulitis with pericolic air), were evaluated for the study. Patients with ongoing antibiotic therapy, immunosuppression, suspicion of peritonitis, organ dysfunction, pregnancy, or other infections requiring antibiotics were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Symptomatic in-or outpatient treatment consisted of mild analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or paracetamol). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of complicated diverticulitis was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 161 patients were included in the study, and 153 (95%) completed the 30-day follow-up. Four (3%) of these patients were misdiagnosed (abscess in the initial CT scan). A total of 14 (9%) patients had pericolic air. Altogether, 140 (87%) patients were treated as outpatients, and 4 (3%) of them were admitted to the hospital during the follow-up. None of the patients developed complicated diverticulitis or required surgery, but, 2 days (median) after inclusion, antibiotics were given to 14 (9%, 6 orally, 8 intravenously) patients. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the lack of a comparison group and by the relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics is safe and effective.

Primary study

Unclassified

Outpatient, non-antibiotic management in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: a prospective study.

blocked
Journal International journal of colorectal disease
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate outpatient, non-antibiotic management in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis with regard to admissions, complications, and recurrences, within a 3-month follow-up period. METHODS: A prospective, observational study in which patients with computer tomography-verified acute uncomplicated diverticulitis were managed as outpatients without antibiotics. The patients kept a personal journal, were contacted daily by a nurse, and then followed up by a surgeon at 1 week and 3 months. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients were included, of which 54 were men; the mean age of the patients was 57.4 years. At the time of diagnosis, the mean C-reactive protein and white blood cell count were 73 mg/l and 10.5 × 10(9), respectively, and normalized in the vast majority of patients within the first week. The majority of the patients (97.4%) were managed successfully as outpatients without antibiotics, admissions, or complications. In only four (2.6%) patients, the management failed because of complications in three and deterioration in one. These patients were all treated successfully as inpatients without surgery. Five patients had recurrences and were treated as outpatients without antibiotics. Follow-up colonic investigations revealed cancer in two patients and polyps in 13 patients. CONCLUSION: Previous results of low complication rates with the non-antibiotic policy were confirmed. The new policy of outpatient management without antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is now shown to be feasible, well functioning, and safe.

Systematic review

Unclassified

A systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient treatment for acute diverticulitis.

blocked
Journal International journal of colorectal disease
Year 2018
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: The shift from routine antibiotics towards omitting antibiotics for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis opens up the possibility for outpatient instead of inpatient treatment, potentially reducing the burden of one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the Western world. PURPOSE: Assessing the safety and cost savings of outpatient treatment in acute colonic diverticulitis. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies on outpatient treatment of colonic diverticulitis, confirmed with computed tomography or ultrasound. Outcomes were readmission rate, need for emergency surgery or percutaneous abscess drainage, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies with 2303 outpatient treated patients were included. These studies predominantly excluded patients with comorbidity or immunosuppression, inability to tolerate oral intake, or lack of an adequate social network. The pooled incidence rate of readmission for outpatient treatment was 7% (95%CI 6-9%, I CONCLUSION: Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis resulted in low readmission rates and very low rates of complications. Furthermore, healthcare cost savings were substantial. Therefore, outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis seems to be a safe option for most patients.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of routine colonic evaluation after radiologically confirmed acute diverticulitis.

Journal Annals of surgery
Year 2014
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of colorectal cancer at routine colonic evaluation after radiologically proven acute diverticulitis. BACKGROUND: Acute diverticulitis accounts for 152,000 hospitalizations in the United States alone. Current guidelines recommend routine colonic evaluation after acute diverticulitis to confirm the diagnosis and exclude malignancy. However, research suggests that the yield of colorectal cancer after computed tomography-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis may be low. In the era of widespread computed tomographic scanning for diverticulitis, routine colonic evaluation after diverticulitis may represent a nonessential burden on health care resources. METHODS: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, BIREME, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. Original studies of colonic evaluation after proven acute diverticulitis were included. Meta-analysis of data from included studies was performed using a DerSimonian Laird random effect proportion analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies from 7 countries were included in the analysis. Out of a pooled population of 1970 patients, cancer was found in 22. The pooled proportional estimate of malignancy was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-2.8%). Of the 1497 patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, cancer was found in 5 (proportional estimate of risk 0.7%; CI, 0.3%-1.4%). Of the 79 patients with complicated disease, cancer was found in 6 (proportion estimate of risk 10.8%; CI, 5.2%-21.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of malignancy after a radiologically proven episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is low. In the absence of other indications, routine colonoscopy may not be necessary. Patients with complicated diverticulitis still have a significant risk of colorectal cancer at subsequent colonic evaluation.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Incidence of Data Duplications in a Randomly Selected Pool of Life Science Publications.

Authors Oksvold MP
Journal Science and engineering ethics
Year 2016
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
Since the solution to many public health problems depends on research, it is critical for the progress and well-being for the patients that we can trust the scientific literature. Misconduct and poor laboratory practice in science threatens the scientific progress, leads to loss of productivity and increased healthcare costs, and endangers lives of patients. Data duplication may represent one of challenges related to these problems. In order to estimate the frequency of data duplication in life science literature, a systematic screen through 120 original scientific articles published in three different cancer related journals [journal impact factor (IF) <5, 5-10 and >20] was completed. The study revealed a surprisingly high proportion of articles containing data duplication. For the IF < 5 and IF > 20 journals, 25 % of the articles were found to contain data duplications. The IF 5-10 journal showed a comparable proportion (22.5 %). The proportion of articles containing duplicated data was comparable between the three journals and no significant correlation to journal IF was found. The editorial offices representing the journals included in this study and the individual authors of the detected articles were contacted to clarify the individual cases. The editorial offices did not reply and only 1 out of 29 cases were apparently clarified by the authors, although no supporting data was supplied. This study questions the reliability of life science literature, it illustrates that data duplications are widespread and independent of journal impact factor and call for a reform of the current peer review and retraction process of scientific publishing.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Is the outpatient management of acute diverticulitis safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

blocked
Journal Techniques in coloproctology
Year 2019
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: In Western countries, the incidence of acute diverticulitis (AD) is increasing. Patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis can undergo a standard antibiotic treatment in an outpatient setting. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of the management of acute diverticulitis in an outpatient setting. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Central and Web of Science up to September 2018. Studies including patients who had outpatient management of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis were considered. We manually checked the reference lists of all included studies to identify any additional studies. Primary outcome was the overall failure rates in the outpatient setting. The failure of outpatient setting was defined as any emergency hospital admission in patients who had outpatient treatment for AD in the previous 60 days. A subgroup analysis of failure was performed in patients with AD of the left colon, with or without comorbidities, with previous episodes of AD, in patients with diabetes, with different severity of AD (pericolic air and abdominal abscess), with or without antibiotic treatment, with ambulatory versus home care unit follow-up, with or without protocol and where outpatient management is a common practice. The secondary outcome was the rate of emergency surgical treatment or percutaneous drainage in patients who failed outpatient treatment. RESULTS: This systematic review included 21 studies including 1781 patients who had outpatient management of AD  including 11 prospective, 9 retrospective and only 1 randomized trial. The meta-analysis showed that outpatient management is safe, and the overall failure rate in an outpatient setting was 4.3% (95% CI 2.6%-6.3%). Localization of diverticulitis is not a selection criterion for an outpatient strategy (p 0.512). The other subgroup analyses did not report any factors that influence the rate of failure: previous episodes of acute diverticulitis (p = 0.163), comorbidities (p = 0.187), pericolic air (p = 0.653), intra-abdominal abscess (p = 0.326), treatment according to a registered protocol (p = 0.078), type of follow-up (p = 0.700), type of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.647) or diabetes (p = 0.610). In patients who failed outpatient treatment, the majority had prolonged antibiotic therapy and only few had percutaneous drainage for an abscess (0.13%) or surgical intervention for perforation (0.06%). These results should be interpreted with some caution because of the low quality of available data. CONCLUSIONS: The outpatient management of AD can reduce the rate of emergency hospitalizations. This setting is already part of the common clinical practice of many emergency departments, in which a standardized protocol is followed. The data reported suggest that this management is safe if associated with an accurate selection of patients (40%); but no subgroup analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups (such as comorbidities, previous episode, diabetes). The main limitations of the findings of the present review concern their applicability in common clinical practice as it was impossible to identify strict criteria of failure.

Primary study

Unclassified

Bran tablets and diverticular disease.

blocked
Authors Taylor I , Duthie HL
Journal British medical journal
Year 1976
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
Three treatments for patients with symptomatic diverticular disease were compared in a crossover trial. Neither a high-roughage diet (HRD) nor Normacol plus an antispasmodic were as effective as bran tablets, which produced a significant increase in daily stool weight and a decrease in the intestinal transit time. An abnormal rapid electrical rhythm in colonic smooth muscle was found initially in 80% of the patients, but the incidence was reduced by each treatment after one month; it was present in only 40% of patients after treatment with bran tablets. Only bran significantly reduced a high percentage motility to within normal limits. Bran proved to be the most effective treatment, not only in improving the symptoms in patients with diverticular disease but also in returning to normal the abnormal pathophysiological changes. Bran tablets were both convenient and acceptable as well as effective.

Primary study

Unclassified

Antibiotic choice in the nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis coli.

Authors Fink M , Smith LE , Rosenthal D
Journal The American surgeon
Year 1981
Links Pubmed
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

High fibre diet in symptomatic diverticular disease of the colon.

blocked
Authors Leahy AL , Ellis RM , Quill DS , Peel AL
Journal Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Year 1985
Links Pubmed PubMed Central
Loading references information
Over the past decade fibre supplementation has achieved widespread acceptance in the management of symptomatic diverticular disease, although the efficacy of this treatment has been debated. We have conducted a retrospective review of 72 patients admitted to hospital with symptomatic diverticular disease over a ten year period in order to determine whether or not high fibre diet afforded protection against the development of complications, necessity for surgery or persistence of symptoms. Fifty-six patients were treated non-operatively, of these 43 received advice concerning a high fibre diet but only 31 patients complied. The 12 patients who failed to take additional fibre and the 13 patients who never received dietary advice (25 patients) formed the non high fibre group. Those treated with fibre supplementation fared significantly better in developing fewer complications and required less surgery (P less than 0.05). At the time of follow-up review patients on a high fibre diet reported significantly fewer symptoms (P less than 0.05).

Primary study

Unclassified

[The ambulatory medical treatment of colonic diverticulitis. An open clinico-endoscopic-histological study with rifaximin, a nonaminoglycoside enteric antibiotic].

blocked
Authors Lombardo L , Lapertosa G
Journal Recenti progressi in medicina
Year 1991
Links Pubmed
Loading references information
Twenty patients with mild acute diverticulitis of the colon were treated with rifaximine 400 mg b.i.d. per os per 10 days. From a clinical point of view, spontaneous and evoked abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea, leukocytosis and hyperthermia resulted in marked significant reduction at the end of treatment, as compared to the basal data (P less than 0.01). A significant reduction of the peridiverticular oedema, mucosal redness, submucosal haemorrhage and diffuse granular pattern was observed endoscopically at the end of treatment (P less than 0.05). Only a trend toward degrees of vasodilation and submucosa hemorrhage was observed from the histological point of view. No side-effect was observed during and after the treatment period.
References ( articles) loading Revert Studify
References ( articles) loading Revert Studify