Fast-track (FT) programs have been applied in colorectal surgery for years. But in liver surgery, role of FT programs has not been fully established. So, a perspective study was performed in our center. A total of 297 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were randomized into FT and non-FT (NFT) group (n = 135 and 162, respectively) according to perioperative managements. Operation time, anhepatic phase and intraoperative blood loss were all significantly reduced in FT group; besides, first exhaust time after operation and hospital stay were also shortened significantly. Spearman correlation showed that operation time was positively correlated with four parameters, including the anhepatic phase, the intraoperative blood loss during surgery, the hospital day and the first exhaust time after surgery. The anhepatic phase was also positively correlated with the intraoperative blood loss during surgery. Besides, the hospital day was positively correlated with the intraoperative blood loss during surgery and the first exhaust time after surgery. FT postoperative management was the only predictor of the shorter first exhaust time after operation and the shorter hospital day. No total postoperative complication, readmission and postoperative mortality were observed. Our data indicated that FT programs were safe and effective in hepatectomy.
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the influence of fast-track surgery (FTS) on insulin resistance indicators in a prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial in esophageal cancer patients.
METHODS: Between November 2009 and March 2011, 34 patients underwent the FTS pathway, and 34 patients underwent the conventional pathway after esophagectomy in our department. The times to postoperative flatus and defecation, duration of postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenditures, and postoperative complications were recorded. Insulin resistance indicators were measured before operation as well as on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (PODs), including serum levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients of both groups. The insulin resistance index (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) was calculated at each time point.
RESULTS: We found a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and faster return of gastrointestinal function in patients who underwent FTS (P < 0.01). In addition, the total hospitalization expenditure was significantly lower in the FTS group (P < 0.01). The preoperative insulin resistance indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups. On PODs 1 and 3, the levels of log-HOMA-IR, FINS, IL-6, and CRP in the FTS group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). On POD 7, the CRP level in the FTS group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: FTS promotes early recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduces stress reaction and postoperative insulin resistance after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) have been shown to reduce length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications in colorectal surgery. Whether ERPs have the same benefits in open liver resection surgery is unclear, and randomized clinical trials are lacking.
METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for open liver resection were randomized to an ERP group or standard care. Primary endpoints were time until medically fit for discharge (MFD) and LOS. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidity, pain scores, readmission rate, mortality, quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction. ERP elements included greater preoperative education, preoperative oral carbohydrate loading, postoperative goal-directed fluid therapy, early mobilization and physiotherapy. Both groups received standardized anaesthesia with epidural analgesia.
RESULTS: The analysis included 46 patients in the ERP group and 45 in the standard care group. Median MFD time was reduced in the ERP group (3 days versus 6 days with standard care; P < 0·001), as was LOS (4 days versus 7 days; P < 0·001). The ERP significantly reduced the rate of medical complications (7 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·020), but not surgical complications (15 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·612), readmissions (4 versus 0 per cent; P = 0·153) or mortality (both 2 per cent; P = 0·987). QoL over 28 days was significantly better in the ERP group (P = 0·002). There was no difference in patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: ERPs for open liver resection surgery are safe and effective. Patients treated in the ERP recovered faster, were discharged sooner, and had fewer medical-related complications and improved QoL.
REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN03274575 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
BACKGROUND: Recent developments in perioperative pathophysiology and care have documented evidence-based, multimodal rehabilitation (fast-track) to hasten recovery and to decrease morbidity and hospital stay for several major surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of introducing fast-track principles for perioperative care in unselected patients undergoing open or laparoscopic liver resection.
METHODS: This was a prospective study involving the first 100 consecutive patients who followed fast-track principles for liver resection. Catheters and drains were systematically removed early, and patients were mobilized and started eating and drinking from the day of surgery. An opioid-sparing multimodal pain treatment was given for the first week. Discharge criteria were: pain sufficiently controlled by oral analgesics alone, patient comfortable with discharge and no untreated complications.
RESULTS: Median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 5 days, with 2 days after laparoscopic versus 5 days following open resection (P < 0·001). Median LOS after minor open resections (fewer than 3 segments) was 5 days versus 6 days for major resections (3 or more segments) (P < 0·001). Simple right or left hemihepatectomies had a median LOS of 5 days. The readmission rate was 6·0 per cent and 30-day mortality was zero.
CONCLUSION: Fast-track principles for perioperative care were introduced successfully and are safe after liver resection. Routine discharge 2 days after laparoscopic resection and 4-5 days after open liver resection may be feasible.
Zeitung»Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
Postoperative analgesia and care for living liver donors have become particular interests for clinicians as the use of living donor liver transplantation has increased. Local anesthetic-based analgesia has been known to provide effective pain control. In this prospective, randomized study, we compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic-based analgesia (PainBuster) with the efficacy of opioid-based analgesia [intrathecal morphine (ITM) with intravenous (IV) fentanyl] in liver donors. Forty adult donors were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: an ITM/IV fentanyl group (n = 21) and a PainBuster group (n = 19). Donors in the PainBuster group received 0.5% ropivacaine via a multi-orifice catheter (ON-Q PainBuster) placed at the wound. Donors in the ITM/IV fentanyl group received ITM sulfate (400 μg) preoperatively and a continuous IV fentanyl infusion postoperatively. A visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and with coughing and rescue IV fentanyl and meperidine consumption were assessed for 72 hours after the operation. Side effects, including sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, wound seroma or hematoma, and the first time to flatus, were recorded. The VAS score at rest during the first 12 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ITM/IV fentanyl group. At other times, the VAS scores were comparable between the groups. In the PainBuster group, rescue IV fentanyl and meperidine use was significantly reduced 24 to 48 hours and 48 to 72 hours after surgery in comparison with the first 24 postoperative hours. The time to first flatus was significantly reduced in the PainBuster group. There were no differences in side effects. In conclusion, analgesia was more satisfactory with ITM/IV fentanyl versus PainBuster during the first 12 hours after surgery, but they became comparable thereafter, with a shortened bowel recovery time in the PainBuster group. The concurrent use of ITM with PainBuster may be considered in a future investigation.
BACKGROUND: Optimized perioperative care within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is designed to reduce morbidity after surgery, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. The present study evaluated this approach in the context of sleeve gastrectomy for patients with morbid obesity.
METHODS: Patients were allocated to perioperative care according to a bariatric ERAS protocol or a control group that received standard care. These groups were also compared with a historical group of patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at the same institution between 2006 and 2010, selected using matched propensity scores. The primary outcome was median length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included readmission rates, postoperative morbidity, postoperative fatigue and mean cost per patient.
RESULTS: Of 116 patients included in the analysis, 78 were allocated to the ERAS (40) or control (38) group and there were 38 in the historical group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (1 day) than in the control (2 days; P < 0·001) and historical (3 days; P < 0·001) groups. It was also shorter in the control group than in the historical group (P = 0·010). There was no difference in readmission rates, postoperative complications or postoperative fatigue. The mean cost per patient was significantly higher in the historical group than in the ERAS (P = 0·010) and control (P = 0·018) groups.
CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol in the setting of bariatric surgery shortened hospital stay and was cost-effective. There was no increase in perioperative morbidity.
REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01303809 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Zeitung»European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fast-track surgery (FTS), combining several techniques with evidence-based adjustments, has shown its effectiveness to accelerate recovery, reduce morbidity and shorten hospital stay in many operations. This randomized controlled study was carried out aiming to compare the short-term outcomes of partial hepatectomy for liver cancer managed with FTS or with conventional surgery (CS).
METHODS: To compare the short-term effects between FTS and CS, a randomized controlled trial was carried out for liver cancer patients undergoing partial hepatectomy from September 2010 to June 2012.
RESULTS: Patients with liver cancers before receiving partial hepatectomy were randomized into the FTS group (n = 80) and the CS group (n = 80). Compared with the CS group, the FTS group had significantly less complications (P < 0.05), shorter durations of nausea/vomiting, paralytic ileus and hospital stay, higher general comfort questionnaire measures (GCQ) by Kolcaba Line (all P < 0.05), and lower serum levels of C-reactive protein on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
CONCLUSIONS: FTS was safe and efficacious. It lessened postoperative stress reactions and accelerated recovery for patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for liver cancer.
CONTEXT: Factors affecting length of hospital stay after uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy have not been reported. We hypothesized that patients undergoing uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy treated by fast track recovery program would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared to those managed by a standard program.
METHODS: Patients without surgical or medical complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy managed by fast track or standard protocols, between 2005 and 2011, were identified and prognostic predictors for length of hospital stay determined.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy had no medical or surgical complications during this period. Of these patients, 20 underwent fast track recovery program compared to 21 who underwent standard care. Patients in the standard group were more likely to have a feeding jejunostomy tube (P<0.001), pylorus preserving procedure (P=0.001) and a nasogastric tube in place longer than 24 hours postoperatively (P<0.001). The median postoperative length of stay was shorter in the fast track recovery program group (8 days, range: 7-16 days) versus 14 days, range: 8-29 days; P<0.001). There were three readmissions in the fast track recovery program related to abdominal pain and none in the standard group. The overall length of stay, accounting for readmissions, still remained significantly shorter in the fast track recovery program group (median 9 days, range: 7-17 days versus median14 days, range: 8-29 days ; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge destination between groups. On multivariate analysis, the only factor independently associated with postoperative discharge by day 8 was fast track recovery program (OR: 37.1, 95% CI: 4.08-338; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Fast track recovery program achieved significantly shorter length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy.
OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are coming to represent the standard of care in many surgical procedures, yet data on their use following hepatic surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to review outcomes after the introduction of an ERAS programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing open hepatic resection from March 2005 to June 2011 was carried out. The primary outcome measure was total hospital length of stay (LoS) (including readmissions). Principles associated with enhanced recovery after surgery were documented and analysed as independent predictors of hospital LoS.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients underwent 128 consecutive hepatic resections, 84 (65.6%) of which were performed in patients with underlying colorectal metastases and 64 (50.0%) of which comprised major hepatic resections. The median hospital LoS was reduced from 6 days to 3 days from the first to the fourth quartiles of the study population (P = 0.021). The proportion of patients suffering complications (26.6%) remained constant across the series. Readmissions increased from the first quartile (none of 32 patients) to the fourth quartile (seven of 32 patients) (P = 0.044). Following multivariate analysis, only the development of a complication (P < 0.001), total postoperative i.v. fluid (P = 0.003) and formation of an anastomosis (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of hospital LoS.
CONCLUSIONS: An ERAS programme can be successfully applied to patients undergoing open hepatic resection with a reduction in hospital LoS, but an increase in the rate of readmissions.
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that cystine and theanine, amino acids related to glutathione synthesis, have immunomodulatory effects, such as suppressing inflammation after strenuous exercise. In this study, we examined the effects of oral administration of cystine and theanine during the perioperative period as a pilot study.
METHODS: Forty-three cases of distal gastrectomy for cancer conducted in our department were assigned to the cystine and theanine group (CT group) or to the placebo control group (P group), and a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study was then performed. Cystine (700 mg) and theanine (280 mg) or a placebo was administered to participants for 10 continuous days (4 days before to 5 days after surgery). Changes in pre- and postoperative interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, total lymphocyte count, resting energy expenditure (REE), and body temperature were compared and examined.
RESULTS: Ten patients were excluded, leaving 33 patients in the study. The CT group had significantly lower IL-6 values (postoperative day [POD] 4), CRP levels (POD 7), neutrophil counts (POD 4), and body temperatures (POD 5) than the P group (P < .05). In addition, REE in the P group peaked on day 1 (1.14 ± 0.16 [pre- and postoperative ratio]), whereas the CT group did not show any increase on POD 1 (0.99 ± 0.21, P < .05 vs P group).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that oral administration of cystine and theanine during the perioperative period may alleviate postgastrectomy inflammation and promote recovery after surgery.
Fast-track (FT) programs have been applied in colorectal surgery for years. But in liver surgery, role of FT programs has not been fully established. So, a perspective study was performed in our center. A total of 297 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were randomized into FT and non-FT (NFT) group (n = 135 and 162, respectively) according to perioperative managements. Operation time, anhepatic phase and intraoperative blood loss were all significantly reduced in FT group; besides, first exhaust time after operation and hospital stay were also shortened significantly. Spearman correlation showed that operation time was positively correlated with four parameters, including the anhepatic phase, the intraoperative blood loss during surgery, the hospital day and the first exhaust time after surgery. The anhepatic phase was also positively correlated with the intraoperative blood loss during surgery. Besides, the hospital day was positively correlated with the intraoperative blood loss during surgery and the first exhaust time after surgery. FT postoperative management was the only predictor of the shorter first exhaust time after operation and the shorter hospital day. No total postoperative complication, readmission and postoperative mortality were observed. Our data indicated that FT programs were safe and effective in hepatectomy.
