Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves motor functions in patients suffering from advanced Parkinson’s disease but in some patients, it is also associated with a mild decline in cognitive functioning about one standard deviation from the preoperative state. We assessed the impact of the cortical lead entry point, the subcortical electrode path and the position of the active electrode contacts on neuropsychological changes after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation compared to a control group of patients receiving best medical treatment. Sixty-eight patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease were randomly assigned to have subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation or best medical treatment for Parkinson’s disease. All patients had a blinded standardized neuropsychological exam (Mattis Dementia Rating scale, backward digit span, verbal fluency and Stroop task performance) at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation were defined as impaired according to a mild decline of one or more standard deviations compared to patients in the best medical treatment group. The cortical entry point of the electrodes, the electrode trajectories and the position of the active electrode contact were transferred into a normalized brain volume by an automated, non-linear registration algorithm to allow accurate statistical group analysis using pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging data. Data of 31 patients of the subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group and 31 patients of the best medical treatment group were analysed. The subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group showed impaired semantic fluency compared with the best medical treatment group 6 months after surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Electrode trajectories intersecting with caudate nuclei increased the risk of a decline in global cognition and working memory performance. Statistically, for every 0.1 ml overlap with a caudate nucleus, the odds for a decline > 1 standard deviation increased by a factor of 37.4 (odds ratio, confidence interval 2.1–371.8) for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and by a factor of 8.8 (odds ratio, confidence interval 1.0–70.9) for the backward digit span task. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation who declined in semantic verbal fluency, Stroop task and the backward digit span task performance showed a position of the active electrode outside the volume built by the active electrodes of stable performers. Passage of the chronic stimulation lead through the head of the caudate increases the risk of global cognitive decline and working memory performance after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Therefore the electrode path should be planned outside the caudate nuclei, whenever possible. This study also stresses the importance of precise positioning of the active stimulating contact within the subthalamic volume to avoid adverse effects on semantic verbal fluency and response inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) significantly improves quality of life (QoL) in PD. However, QoL fails to improve in a relevant proportion of patients. We studied clinical baseline and progression parameters associated with improvement in QoL after DBS. Data from a German randomized, controlled study comparing DBS (60 patients) with best medical treatment (59 patients) were analyzed. Changes in patients' QoL were assessed using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. For the STN-DBS patients, the changes in PDQ-39 were correlated with predefined clinical preoperative and progression parameters. Scores for QoL improved after STN-DBS for 57% of the patients, and for 43% patients, they did not improve. Patients with improvement in QoL showed significantly higher cumulative daily "off" time. Changes in the PDQ-39 showed a significant positive correlation with the cumulative daily off time at baseline. Logistic regression analysis revealed that 1 additional hour off time at baseline increases the odds for improvement on PDQ-39 by a factor of 1.33 (odds ratio). In the postoperative course, changes in the PDQ-39 significantly correlated with the reduction of cumulative daily off time, an improvement on the UPDRS (UPDRS III off), and positive mood changes. Among the baseline parameters, the cumulative daily off time is the strongest predictor for improvement in disease-related QoL after DBS. Improvement in QoL after STN-DBS is also correlated with changes in motor functions and changes in depression and anxiety.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) significantly improves quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Dementia is considered as a contraindication for STN-DBS. However, no controlled study assessed the impact of STN-DBS on the QoL and motor outcome in PD patients with a borderline global cognitive impairment. We studied clinical baseline and progression parameters in a cohort of STN-DBS patients with a global cognitive score still in the non-demented range but scoring in the lowest quartile of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), a measure of global cognitive functioning. Data from a German randomised controlled study comparing DBS (60 patients) with best medical treatment (BMT, 59 patients) were analysed. Changes in patients' QoL scores were assessed using the Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) at baseline and at the 6 months follow up. Patients were split into four groups according to their MDRS performance at baseline and these groups were compared in the context of motor outcome and QoL. Twelve out of sixty patients of the STN-DBS group scored in the lowest quartile of the MDRS (range between one hundred thirty and one hundred thirty seven points). An individual analysis revealed that 3 of 12 patients showed a clinical relevant improvement in QoL whereas the group statistics did not reveal any significant improvement in QoL measures after STN-DBS compared to the BMT group. Since this failure to improve in QoL cannot be explained by a failure to improve in motor functions, stimulation settings and psychiatric scales after STN-DBS, the failure to improve in QoL in patients with a borderline global cognitive score might be specifically related to lower cognitive functioning.
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) reduces motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and improves their quality of life; however, the effect of DBS on cognitive functions and its psychiatric side-effects are still controversial. To assess the neuropsychiatric consequences of DBS in patients with PD we did an ancillary protocol as part of a randomised study that compared DBS with the best medical treatment.
METHODS: 156 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations were randomly assigned to have DBS of the STN or the best medical treatment for PD according to the German Society of Neurology guidelines. 123 patients had neuropsychological and psychiatric examinations to assess the changes between baseline and after 6 months. The primary outcome was the comparison of the effect of DBS with the best medical treatment on overall cognitive functioning (Mattis dementia rating scale). Secondary outcomes were the effects on executive function, depression, anxiety, psychiatric status, manic symptoms, and quality of life. Analysis was per protocol. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00196911.
FINDINGS: 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive STN-DBS and 63 patients to have best medical treatment. After 6 months, impairments were seen in executive function (difference of changes [DBS-best medical treatment] in verbal fluency [semantic] -4.50 points, 95% CI -8.07 to -0.93, Cohen's d=-;0.4; verbal fluency [phonemic] -3.06 points, -5.50 to -0.62, -0.5; Stroop 2 naming colour error rate -0.37 points, -0.73 to 0.00, -0.4; Stroop 3 word reading time -5.17 s, -8.82 to -1.52, -0.5; Stroop 4 colour naming time -13.00 s, -25.12 to -0.89, -0.4), irrespective of the improvement in quality of life (difference of changes in PDQ-39 10.16 points, 5.45 to 14.87, 0.6; SF-36 physical 16.55 points, 10.89 to 22.21, 0.9; SF-36 psychological 9.74 points, 2.18 to 17.29, 0.5). Anxiety was reduced in the DBS group compared with the medication group (difference of changes in Beck anxiety inventory 10.43 points, 6.08 to 14.78, 0.8). Ten patients in the DBS group and eight patients in the best medical treatment group had severe psychiatric adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: DBS of the STN does not reduce overall cognition or affectivity, although there is a selective decrease in frontal cognitive functions and an improvement in anxiety in patients after the treatment. These changes do not affect improvements in quality of life. DBS of the STN is safe with respect to neuropsychological and psychiatric effects in carefully selected patients during a 6-month follow-up period.
FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GI0201).
BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reduces levodopa-related motor complications in advanced Parkinson's disease. We compared this treatment plus medication with medical management. METHODS: In this randomized-pairs trial, we enrolled 156 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and severe motor symptoms. The primary end points were the changes from baseline to six months in the quality of life, as assessed by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and the severity of symptoms without medication, according to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS-III). RESULTS: Pairwise comparisons showed that neurostimulation, as compared with medication alone, caused greater improvements from baseline to six months in the PDQ-39 (50 of 78 pairs, P=0.02) and the UPDRS-III (55 of 78, P<0.001), with mean improvements of 9.5 and 19.6 points, respectively. Neurostimulation resulted in improvements of 24 to 38 percent in the PDQ-39 subscales for mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, and bodily discomfort. Serious adverse events were more common with neurostimulation than with medication alone (13 percent vs. 4 percent, P<0.04) and included a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. The overall frequency of adverse events was higher in the medication group (64 percent vs. 50 percent, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In this six-month study of patients under 75 years of age with severe motor complications of Parkinson's disease, neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus was more effective than medical management alone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Assessment of the therapeutic effect of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus compared with drug treatment alone in patients with advanced Parkinson\'s disease.
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves motor functions in patients suffering from advanced Parkinson’s disease but in some patients, it is also associated with a mild decline in cognitive functioning about one standard deviation from the preoperative state. We assessed the impact of the cortical lead entry point, the subcortical electrode path and the position of the active electrode contacts on neuropsychological changes after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation compared to a control group of patients receiving best medical treatment. Sixty-eight patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease were randomly assigned to have subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation or best medical treatment for Parkinson’s disease. All patients had a blinded standardized neuropsychological exam (Mattis Dementia Rating scale, backward digit span, verbal fluency and Stroop task performance) at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation were defined as impaired according to a mild decline of one or more standard deviations compared to patients in the best medical treatment group. The cortical entry point of the electrodes, the electrode trajectories and the position of the active electrode contact were transferred into a normalized brain volume by an automated, non-linear registration algorithm to allow accurate statistical group analysis using pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging data. Data of 31 patients of the subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group and 31 patients of the best medical treatment group were analysed. The subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation group showed impaired semantic fluency compared with the best medical treatment group 6 months after surgery (P = 0.02). Electrode trajectories intersecting with caudate nuclei increased the risk of a decline in global cognition and working memory performance. Statistically, for every 0.1 ml overlap with a caudate nucleus, the odds for a decline > 1 standard deviation increased by a factor of 37.4 (odds ratio, confidence interval 2.1–371.8) for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and by a factor of 8.8 (odds ratio, confidence interval 1.0–70.9) for the backward digit span task. Patients with subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation who declined in semantic verbal fluency, Stroop task and the backward digit span task performance showed a position of the active electrode outside the volume built by the active electrodes of stable performers. Passage of the chronic stimulation lead through the head of the caudate increases the risk of global cognitive decline and working memory performance after subthalamic nucleus–deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Therefore the electrode path should be planned outside the caudate nuclei, whenever possible. This study also stresses the importance of precise positioning of the active stimulating contact within the subthalamic volume to avoid adverse effects on semantic verbal fluency and response inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
