BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate whether opioids when used for intra-operative analgesia may enhance post-operative pain. We studied the effect of two different intra-operative dosings of sufentanil on post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia after cardiac anaesthesia. METHODS: Forty-two male patients (age: 48-74 years) undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to one of two groups receiving total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and a target controlled infusion of sufentanil with a target of 0.4 ng/mL (group SL, n = 20) or 0.8 ng/mL (group SH, n = 22) plasma concentration. Post-operative morphine requirement in the first 48 h was assessed using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Pain rating during deep inspiration, and the extent of primary and secondary hyperalgesia near the sternotomy wound were assessed. RESULTS: The post-operative morphine requirements in the first 48 h were 0.68 ± 0.21 mg/kg in group SL and 0.96 ± 0.44 mg/kg in group SH (p < 0.05). In group SL, pain during deep inspiration was significantly lower on the first post-operative day (p < 0.05). Primary hyperalgesia had its maximum on the second and third post-operative day, without a difference between the two groups. The extent of secondary mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia was not different between the groups. DISCUSSION: Intra-operative dosing of sufentanil significantly influenced post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia. For cardiac anaesthesia in combination with propofol, a sufentanil target concentration of 0.4 ng/mL may be preferable.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative infusion of opioids has been associated with increased postoperative pain and analgesic requirements, but the development of tolerance in young children is less clear. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to test the hypothesis that the intraoperative administration of remifentanil results in postoperative opioid tolerance in a dose-related manner in young children.
METHODS: We enrolled 60 children (aged 1-5 yr) who were undergoing elective laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. Patients were randomized and received an intraoperative infusion of 0, 0.3, 0.6, or 0.9 µg·kg·min remifentanil. Postoperative pain was managed by a parent/nurse-controlled analgesia pump using fentanyl. The primary outcome included the total fentanyl consumptions at 24 and 48 h postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were the postoperative pain scores and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The children who received 0.6 and 0.9 µg·kg·min remifentanil required more postoperative fentanyl than the children who received saline or 0.3 µg·kg·min remifentanil (all P < 0.001) for 24 h after surgery. The children who received 0.3-0.9 µg·kg·min intraoperative remifentanil reported higher pain scores at 1 h after surgery than the children who received saline (P = 0.002, P = 0.023, and P = 0.006, respectively). No significant intergroup differences in recovery variables were observed, but vomiting was more frequent in the 0.9 µg·kg·min remifentanil group than in the other groups (P = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative use of 0.3 µg·kg·min remifentanil for approximately 3 h (range: 140-265 min) did not induce acute tolerance, but the administration of 0.6 and 0.9 µg·kg·min remifentanil to young children resulted in acute tolerance for 24 h after surgery in an apparently dose-related manner.
Objective: One of the strategies to attenuate opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) may be to decrease intraoperative doses of opioids by using target-controlled infusion (TCI). Design: Double-blind and randomized study. Setting: A single university hospital. Participants: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists II to III patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Interventions: patients were randomized to 1 of the 2 groups: 1 group received an infusion of intraoperative remifentanil using TCI (target: 7 ng/mL), and the 2nd one was given an intraoperative continuous infusion (CI) (0.3 μg/kg/min). The anesthestic protocol and postoperative pain management were the same in both groups. The extent of mechanical dynamic hyperalgesia on the middle line perpendicular to the wound was considered the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were other results of dynamic and punctuate hyperalgesia until postoperative day 7, visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) scores, and total morphine consumption until postoperative day 2. Measurements and Main Results: Morphometric and demographic characteristics and duration of surgery were comparable in both groups. Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was greater in CI than in TCI group (5,329 [1,833] v 3,662 [1,160] μg, p = 0.003). During the first 44 hours, there were no differences in morphine consumption, VAS, and VRS. The extent of hyperalgesia was significantly lower on postoperative days 1, 2, and 4 in the TCI group than in the CI group on the 3 evaluated lines (p < 0.05). Punctuate hyperalgesia evaluating 3 different points was lower in the TCI than in the CI group from postoperative day 1 until postoperative day 7 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The intraoperative decrease of opioid consumption when comparing the CI versus TCI mode of administration of remifentanil led to less OIH after cardiac surgery.
BACKGROUND: In a randomized, double-blind, prospective study, we investigated whether an intraoperative high versus low dose of remifentanil increased postoperative hyperalgesia and whether magnesium can prevent remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia.
METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Remifentanil was intraoperatively infused at 0.05 μg/kg/min (group LO) or 0.2 μg/kg/min (groups HI and HM). Patients in group HM received MgSO(4) 30 mg/kg at induction followed by an intraoperative infusion of 10 mg/kg/h. Mechanical pain thresholds on the forearm and periincisional area were assessed by von Frey filament the evening before surgery and postoperatively at 24 and 48 hours. Pain measured on a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) (0-10) and additional analgesics were recorded in the postanesthesia care unit postoperatively at 6, 24, and 48 hours.
RESULTS: There was a significantly greater decrease in pain threshold on the periincisional area at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively in group HI, as compared with the other 2 groups. The 95% confidence intervals for the mean difference in pain thresholds on the periincisional area at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively were 0.31 to 1.11 and 0.36 to 1.14 for group HI versus group LO, 0.45 to 1.26 and 0.54 to 1.32 for group HI versus group HM (values are log(10) of force in milligrams). The change in pain threshold on the forearm was similar among the groups. Group HI had significantly higher VNRS scores (median [interquartile range], 3 [2-4]) than group LO (2 [1-3] and group HM (2 [1-3]) at 48 hours postoperatively. The 95% confidence intervals for median difference in VNRS score at 48 hours postoperatively were 1 to 2 for group HI versus group LO and 0 to 2 for group HI versus group HM. There were no significant differences in the number of patients who requested rescue analgesics in the postoperative anesthesia care unit and general ward during 48 hours postoperatively among the 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A relatively high dose of intraoperative remifentanil enhances periincisional hyperalgesia. Intraoperative MgSO(4) prevents remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia. However, hyperalgesia did not reach clinical relevance in terms of postoperative pain or analgesic consumption in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
There is an ongoing debate whether opioids when used for intra-operative analgesia may enhance post-operative pain. We studied the effect of two different intra-operative dosings of sufentanil on post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia after cardiac anaesthesia.
METHODS:
Forty-two male patients (age: 48-74 years) undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to one of two groups receiving total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and a target controlled infusion of sufentanil with a target of 0.4 ng/mL (group SL, n = 20) or 0.8 ng/mL (group SH, n = 22) plasma concentration. Post-operative morphine requirement in the first 48 h was assessed using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Pain rating during deep inspiration, and the extent of primary and secondary hyperalgesia near the sternotomy wound were assessed.
RESULTS:
The post-operative morphine requirements in the first 48 h were 0.68 ± 0.21 mg/kg in group SL and 0.96 ± 0.44 mg/kg in group SH (p < 0.05). In group SL, pain during deep inspiration was significantly lower on the first post-operative day (p < 0.05). Primary hyperalgesia had its maximum on the second and third post-operative day, without a difference between the two groups. The extent of secondary mechanical pinprick hyperalgesia was not different between the groups.
DISCUSSION:
Intra-operative dosing of sufentanil significantly influenced post-operative morphine consumption, pain and hyperalgesia. For cardiac anaesthesia in combination with propofol, a sufentanil target concentration of 0.4 ng/mL may be preferable.
