OBJECTIVE: Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is a minimally invasive therapy for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with knee pain refractory to conservative management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of GAE for OA related knee pain as part of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, a systematic review was performed to identify studies evaluating treatment of knee OA with GAE. The primary outcome measure was change in pain scale score at 6 months. A Hedge's g was computed as a measure of effect size, selecting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) first if available and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index if VAS was not available.
RESULTS: After screening titles, abstracts, and the full text, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 351 treated knees were included. Patients who underwent GAE demonstrated declines in VAS pain scores at 1 month {- 34 points [95% CI (- 43.8, - 24.6)], 3 months {- 30 points [95% CI (- 41.7, - 19.2)], 6 months {- 41 points [95% CI (- 54.0, - 27.2)], and 12 months {- 37 points [95% CI (- 55.0, - 18.1)]. Hedges' g from baseline to 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, was {- 1.3 [95% CI (- 1.6, - 0.97)]}, {- 1.2 [95% CI (- 1.54, - 0.84)]}, {- 1.4 [95% CI (- 2.1, - 0.8)]}, and {- 1.25 [95% CI (- 2.0, - 0.6)]}, respectively.
CONCLUSION: GAE provides durable reductions in pain scores for patients suffering with mild, moderate, and severe OA.
BACKGROUND: Geniculate Artery Embolization (GAE) is a novel, minimally-invasive treatment for mild to moderate Osteoarthritis (OA) associated with musculoskeletal pain.
PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of GAE in patients with mild to moderate OA of the knee using a Quantitative-analysis of the available literature.
METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for GAE-related studies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed following PRISMA-guidelines. Quantitative-analysis was performed using windows based 'MedCalc-Statistical-Software version 19.6.1 (2020). Statistical analysis was performed in Stata-IC-13.1(Stata corp-USA). Quantitative-analysis was done using the random-effects model, and the Standardized-Mean-Differences (SMD) were calculated.
RESULTS: After a full-text review, 13 studies with 399 knees (345-patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis, 10 were included in the quantitative synthesis. The total WOMAC score improved by a [SMD (95% CI)] of 3.46 points (1.27, 5.65), 3.50 (1.28, 5.71), 3.77 (0.58, 6.96), 5.46 (1.59, 9.33), 2.96 (-0.93, 6.85) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months respectively. The VAS score improved by 2.06 (1.35, 2.76), 2.13 (1.39, 2.87), 2.36 (1.85, 2.90), 2.09 (0.91, 3.28) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 6, 12 months respectively. The Pain WOMAC score improved by SMD 2.97 (0.51, 5.43), 3.77 (0.58, 6.96), 2.27 (0.31, 4.22), 2.27 (0.31, 4.22) compared to baseline at 1, 3, 12, 24 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant change from baseline in all outcome measures after GAE. GAE is a safe and effective method for pain control in mild to moderate OA-associated knee pain in the short and medium term.
OBJECTIVE: Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is a novel, minimally invasive procedure for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This meta-analysis investigated the safety and effectiveness of this procedure.
DESIGN: Outcomes of this systematic review with meta-analysis were technical success, knee pain visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 scale), WOMAC Total Score (0-100 scale), retreatment rate, and adverse events. Continuous outcomes were calculated as the weighted mean difference (WMD) versus baseline. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) rates were estimated in Monte Carlo simulations. Rates of total knee replacement and repeat GAE were calculated using life-table methods.
RESULTS: In 10 groups (9 studies; 270 patients; 339 knees), GAE technical success was 99.7%. Over 12 months, the WMD ranged from -34 to -39 at each follow-up for VAS score and -28 to -34 for WOMAC Total score (all p < 0.001). At 12 months, 78% met the MCID for VAS score; 92% met the MCID for WOMAC Total score, and 78% met the SCB for WOMAC Total score. Higher baseline knee pain severity was associated with greater improvements in knee pain. Over 2 years, 5.2% of patients underwent total knee replacement and 8.3% received repeat GAE. Adverse events were minor, with transient skin discoloration as the most common (11.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that GAE is a safe procedure that confers improvement in knee OA symptoms at established MCID thresholds. Patients with greater knee pain severity may be more responsive to GAE.
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To review and indirectly compare the outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE), radiofrequency (RF) ablation, and intra-articular (IA) injection for the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review of the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases was conducted with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement in June 2020. The visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded at baseline and at all available time points for each therapy. Standard mean differences were calculated at each time point and compared between treatments to assess the magnitude of the treatment effect. RESULTS: All 3 treatments demonstrated significant differences in VAS scores after therapy. RF ablation produced the greatest significant mean reduction in relative VAS score from baseline at 1 year of follow-up (mean, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.59; P = .03). GAE reported the most significant reductions in VAS scores across all measured time points. Overall, the comparison did not demonstrate a significant difference in VAS scores among patients receiving IA injections, RF ablation, and GAE. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not suggest a significant difference in outcomes among IA injection, RF ablation, and GAE for knee pain secondary to OA.
BACKGROUND: Genicular artery embolization emerges as an innovative technique described for the treatment of refractory pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This review summarizes the available data on the efficacy of genicular artery embolization in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and refractory pain as an alternative treatment or associated with pharmacological treatment.
METHODS: Review according to PRISMA® standards on genicular artery embolization and knee osteoarthritis.
RESULTS: Thirteen publications out of a total of 63 studies reporting data from 914 patients were analyzed according to inclusion criteria. The indication of embolization was performed in patients with severe chronic pain refractory to conservative treatment and moderate-to-severe knee OA. Only minor complications have been reported.
CONCLUSION: Genicular artery embolization is a possible and potentially very effective alternative in the treatment of chronic refractory pain in patients with knee OA, without serious complications. All studies conclude in favor of embolization of the genicular arteries in the treatment of chronic refractory pain in patients with knee OA.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the literature on trans-arterial embolization in inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions, focusing on efficacy and safety.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. A systematic literature search revealed 19 studies, with a total of 394 participants, eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS: The included studies consisted of case reports/series and non-randomized interventional studies, with knee osteoarthritis and adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder as the most frequent conditions. In all studies except one, pain was reduced up to four years after treatment. All adverse events were transient. Due to high heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible.
CONCLUSION: The included early studies showed encouraging results regarding efficacy and safety. However, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are warranted.
Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is a minimally invasive therapy for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with knee pain refractory to conservative management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of GAE for OA related knee pain as part of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Using Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, a systematic review was performed to identify studies evaluating treatment of knee OA with GAE. The primary outcome measure was change in pain scale score at 6 months. A Hedge's g was computed as a measure of effect size, selecting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) first if available and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index if VAS was not available.
RESULTS:
After screening titles, abstracts, and the full text, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 351 treated knees were included. Patients who underwent GAE demonstrated declines in VAS pain scores at 1 month {- 34 points [95% CI (- 43.8, - 24.6)], 3 months {- 30 points [95% CI (- 41.7, - 19.2)], 6 months {- 41 points [95% CI (- 54.0, - 27.2)], and 12 months {- 37 points [95% CI (- 55.0, - 18.1)]. Hedges' g from baseline to 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, was {- 1.3 [95% CI (- 1.6, - 0.97)]}, {- 1.2 [95% CI (- 1.54, - 0.84)]}, {- 1.4 [95% CI (- 2.1, - 0.8)]}, and {- 1.25 [95% CI (- 2.0, - 0.6)]}, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
GAE provides durable reductions in pain scores for patients suffering with mild, moderate, and severe OA.
