Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
5 articles (5 References) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal American journal of ophthalmology
Year 2002
Loading references information
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intraoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or Intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) in eyes undergoing primary trabeculectomy. DESIGN: Prospective double-masked randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred fifteen eyes of 103 patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximally tolerated medical therapy or laser were prospectively randomized in a double-masked fashion to one of two treatment groups in a single institution setting. Subject's eyes underwent primary trabeculectomy with either topical 5-FU (50 mg/ml for 5 minutes) or topical MMC (0.2 mg/ml for 2 minutes). Primary outcome measures included the number of eyes achieving target pressures of 21, 18, 15, and 12 mm Hg at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, complications, and interventions. RESULTS: Of the 115 eyes, 57 received 5-FU while 58 received MMC. A target IOP of 21 mm Hg at 6 months was achieved in 53 of 56 (95%) eyes in the 5-FU group and 54 of 57 (95%) eyes in the MMC group (P = 1.00). At 12 months, 45 of 48 (94%) eyes in the 5-FU group met a target IOP of 21 mm Hg while 48 of 54 (89%) eyes in the MMC group did (P =.49). The most common complications in each group were persistent choroidal effusions and bleb leak. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that intraoperative topical 5-FU is at least as effective as intraoperative topical MMC in reducing IOP of eyes undergoing primary trabeculectomy.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Ophthalmology
Year 2000
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) when used as adjuncts with primary trabeculectomy in eyes not at high risk for failure. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirteen patients with primary open-angle, pseudoexfoliative, pigmentary, or angle-closure glaucoma undergoing primary trabeculectomy were recruited. METHODS: One eye of each patient was randomized to receive either 5-FU (50 mg/ml for 5 minutes) or MMC (0.4 mg/ml for 2 minutes). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, complications, and interventions were documented at fixed intervals after surgery. The study also examined progression of visual field loss, long-term complications, and bleb appearance 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients with complete perioperative information, 54 eyes received 5-FU and 54 received MMC. The proportion of patients reaching different predefined target IOPs after surgery was slightly higher in the MMC group than in the 5-FU group. This difference was less than 25%, which would have been necessary to achieve statistical significance with a power of 0.8 and the sample size used. Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to mean preoperative IOP, complications, or interventions. Mean postoperative follow-up was 309 and 330 days in the 5-FU and MMC groups, respectively (P = 0.593). CONCLUSIONS: 5-Fluorouracil and MMC were found to be equally safe and effective adjuncts to primary trabeculectomy in the short- and medium-term postoperative periods.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal American journal of ophthalmology
Year 1997
Loading references information
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of intraoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C used adjunctively with trabeculectomy in a black West African population. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive eyes of 85 black patients undergoing primary trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma were prospectively randomly assigned to receive either 5-FU (50 mg/ml for 5 minutes) or mitomycin C (0.5 mg/ml for 3 1/2 minutes) intraoperatively by soaked sponge. RESULTS: Of the 81 eyes with at least a 3-month postoperative follow-up, 41 of 44 (93.2%) in the mitomycin C group and 27 of 37 (73.0%) in the 5-FU group had a final intraocular pressure of less than 21 mm Hg (P = .01). Twenty-eight of 44 eyes (63.6%) in the mitomycin C group and 18 of 37 (51.4%) in the 5-FU group had a final intraocular pressure of less than 15 mm Hg (P = .26). Mean postoperative intraocular pressure was 13.7 mm Hg in the mitomycin C group and 16.3 mm Hg in the 5-FU group (P = .05). There were no differences between the two groups in mean age, preoperative intraocular pressure, postoperative visual acuity, and complications. Mean follow-up was 10.0 +/- 4.41 months (range, 4 to 19 months). CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive use of mitomycin C with trabeculectomy is equally safe and more efficacious compared to 5-FU in this West African population. Use of mitomycin C in this study was not associated with a statistically significantly greater proportion of patients achieving low intraocular pressure (less than 15 mm Hg) compared to 5-FU.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Lamping KA , Belkin JK
Journal Ophthalmology
Year 1995
Loading references information
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C enhance the success rate of filtration surgery in aphakic eyes. However, eyes with posterior chamber implants have not been specifically studied. This study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of 5-FU with that of mitomycin C in eyes that have posterior chamber implants and undergo filtration surgery for uncontrolled glaucoma. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 74 patients who had previous cataract surgery with posterior chamber implants and who subsequently required trabeculectomy for uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma were randomized to receive either subconjunctival postoperative 5-FU or intraoperative mitomycin C. RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, intraocular pressures (IOPs) averaged 12.8 +/- 5.5 mmHg (mean +/- standard deviation) in the mitomycin C group and 14.8 +/- 3.8 mmHg in the 5-FU group (P = 0.001). Mitomycin C-treated eyes received an average of 0.6 medications for IOP control, and 5-FU-treated eyes received an average of 1.05 medications (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Mitomycin C appears to be a viable alternative to 5-FU in patients with posterior chamber implants with uncontrolled glaucoma who require filtration surgery.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Archives of ophthalmology
Year 1991
Loading references information
We conducted a prospective, randomized study to compare mitomycin with fluorouracil for efficacy and safety as an adjunct to trabeculectomy in eyes with glaucoma with poor surgical prognosis. Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were randomly allocated to either mitomycin (17 eyes) or fluorouracil therapy (15 eyes). Mitomycin (0.2 mg) was applied only once during trabeculectomy, and fluorouracil (5 mg) was subconjunctivally injected 10 times in the 2 weeks after surgery. Fifteen eyes (88%) in the mitomycin group and seven (47%) in the fluorouracil group achieved an intraocular pressure of less than or equal to 20 mm Hg without antiglaucoma medication. The follow-up period was 7 to 12 months. Corneal complications were less common in the group given mitomycin than in that given fluorouracil (12% vs 53%). The incidence of other complications was similar between the two groups.