BACKGROUND: Perineural inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor have recently generated intense interest as an alternative to epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline better improves pain and function in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
DESIGN: A multicenter, 3-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 2008 to 2011. Randomization was computer-generated and stratified by site. Pharmacists prepared the syringes. Patients, treating physicians, and nurses assessing outcomes were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00733096)
SETTING: Military and civilian treatment centers.
PATIENTS: 84 adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy of less than 6 months' duration.
INTERVENTION: 2 epidural injections of steroids, etanercept, or saline, mixed with bupivacaine and separated by 2 weeks.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was leg pain 1 month after the second injection. All patients had 1-month follow-up visits; patients whose condition improved remained blinded for the 6-month study period.
RESULTS: The group that received epidural steroids had greater reductions in the primary outcome measure than those who received saline (mean difference, -1.26 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.27]; P = 0.11) or etanercept (mean difference, -1.01 [CI, -2.60 to 0.58]; P = 0.21). For back pain, smaller differences favoring steroids compared with saline (mean difference, -0.52 [CI, -1.85 to 0.81]; P = 0.44) and etanercept (mean difference, -0.92 [CI,-2.28 to 0.44]; P = 0.18) were observed. The largest differences were noted for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etanercept (mean difference, -16.16 [CI, -26.05 to -6.27]; P = 0.002), steroids vs. saline (mean difference, -5.87 [CI, -15.59 to 3.85]; P = 0.23), and etanercept vs. saline (mean difference, 10.29 [CI, 0.55 to 20.04]; P = 0.04). More patients treated with epidural steroids (75%) reported 50% or greater leg pain relief and a positive global perceived effect at 1 month than those who received saline (50%) or etanercept (42%) (P = 0.09).
LIMITATION: Short-term follow-up, small sample size, and a possibly subtherapeutic dose of etanercept.
CONCLUSION: Epidural steroid injections may provide modest short-term pain relief for some adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy, but larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm their benefits.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, International Spinal Intervention Society, and Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research.
Objective. Based on several experimental results and on a preliminary study, a trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy of adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor, in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Methods. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 2005 and December 2007 in Switzerland. Patients with acute (duration of <12 weeks) and severe (Oswestry Disability Index score of >50) radicular leg pain and imagingconfirmed lumbar disc herniation were randomized to receive as adjuvant therapy either 2 subcutaneous injections of adalimumab (40 mg) at 7-day intervals or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the score for leg pain, based on a visual analog scale (0-100 mm), which was recorded every day for 10 days and at 6 weeks and 6 months. Results. Of the 265 patients screened, 61 were enrolled; 31 patients were assigned to receive adalimumab, and 4 patients in the placebo group were lost to followup. Over time, the course of leg pain was more favorable in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group (P = 0.002). However, the effect size was relatively small, and at the last followup visit the difference was 13.8 (95% confidence interval -11.5, 39.0). Compared with patients in the placebo group, approximately twice as many patients in the adalimumab group fulfilled the criteria for "responders" and for "low residual disease impact" (P < 0.05), and fewer surgical discectomies were performed (6 versus 13 in the placebo group; P = 0.04). Conclusion. The addition of a short course of adalimumab to the treatment regimen of patients experiencing acute and severe sciatica resulted in a small decrease in leg pain and in significantly fewer surgical procedures.
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence implicates the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor as a major cause of radiculopathy. Yet, whereas open-label studies with systemically delivered tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have yielded positive results, a placebo-controlled study failed to demonstrate efficacy. One variable that may have contributed to poor outcomes is low drug levels at the site of nerve inflammation. To date, no studies have evaluated the efficacy or safety of epidurally administered anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study was conducted to evaluate an epidural tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. Twenty-four patients with subacute lumbosacral radiculopathy were randomly assigned to receive two transforaminal epidural injections of 2, 4, or 6 mg of entanercept 2 weeks apart in successive groups of eight. In each group, two patients received epidural saline. A parallel epidural canine safety study was conducted using the same injection doses and paradigm as in the clinical study. RESULTS: The animal and human safety studies revealed no behavioral, neurologic, or histologic evidence of drug-related toxicity. In the clinical arm, significant improvements in leg and back pain were collectively noted for the etanercept-treated patients, but not for the saline group, one month after treatment. One patient in the saline group (17%), six patients in the 2-mg group (100%), and four patients each in the 4-mg and 6-mg groups (67%) reported at least 50% reduction in leg pain and a positive global perceived effect one month after treatment. Six months after treatment, the beneficial effects persisted in all but one patient. CONCLUSION: Epidural entanercept holds promise as a treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF), in patients with acute/subacute sciatica secondary to herniated disc at L3/4 or L4/5. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. Background: The results from our randomized trial demonstrated no efficacy for Infliximab but the subgroup results suggested that Infliximab may be effective for sciatica induced by herniations at L3/4 or L4/5. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were unilateral moderate-to-severe sciatic pain with an MRI-confirmed disc herniation at L3/4 or L4/5 and candidacy for discectomy. Patients were randomized to receive either a single infusion of Infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo. Outcomes included intensity of leg and back pain, Oswestry disability, quality-of-life (RAND-36) and straight leg raising (SLR) restriction at week 26. Data between baseline and the six-month follow-up were analyzed using MannWhitney U test. RESULTS: Due to slow recruitment the trial ended prematurely after 15 patients in total were allocated to receive Infliximab (n=7) or placebo (n=8). At week 26, leg pain intensity had decreased by 73% in the Infliximab group compared to 65% in the control group (p=0.52). For all measured variables at 6 months, Infliximab treatment was associated with greater improvements compared to placebo, especially at early time points. Two patients in the Infliximab group and three in the placebo group had a discectomy or caudal injection (p=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Our results warrant continuation of research on TNF antagonists in sciatica induced by disc herniations at L3/4 or L4/5.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, reference-controlled, investigator-initiated, single center.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Autologous Conditioned Serum (ACS; Orthokine) for the treatment of lumbar radicular compression in comparison to triamcinolone.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evidence from animal studies indicates that cytokines such as interleukin-1 play a decisive role in the pathophysiology of lumbar radiculopathy. ACS is enriched in the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and other anti-inflammatory cytokines.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients were treated by epidural perineural injections with ACS; 27 patients were treated with 5 mg triamcinolone and 25 patients with 10 mg triamcinolone. Treatment was applied once per week for 3 consecutive weeks and followed for 6 months. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of low back pain was the primary outcome measure. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the secondary endpoint of the study. All statistical analyses were performed in an exploratory manner using SAS for Windows, version 8.2, on a personal computer. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the VAS and ODI by treatment group and time point. The data were submitted to a repeated-measurements analysis of variance with effects on treatment group, time, and treatment group-by-time interaction.
RESULTS: Patients with lumbar back pain who were treated with ACS or the 2 triamcinolone concentrations showed a clinically remarkable and statistically significant reduction in pain and disability, as measured by patient administered outcome measurements. From Week 12 to the final evaluation at Week 22, injections with ACS showed a consistent pattern of superiority over both triamcinolone groups with regard to the VAS score for pain, but statistical significance was observed only at Week 22 in direct comparison to the triamcinolone 5 group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 triamcinolone dosages during the 6 months of the study.
CONCLUSION: ACS is an encouraging treatment option for patients with unilateral lumbar radicular compression. The decrease in pain was pronounced, clinically remarkable, and potentially superior to steroid injection.
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), in patients with acute/subacute sciatica secondary to herniated disc.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The results of experimental studies and our open-label trial support the use of infliximab in sciatica. Here we report the 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial (FIRST II, Finnish Infliximab Related STudy) evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single infusion of infliximab for sciatic pain.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were unilateral sciatic pain with a disc herniation concordant with the symptoms and signs of radicular pain. Patients had to be candidates for discectomy. Criteria for discectomy included (in addition to a symptomatic disc herniation on MRI) neural entrapment (straight leg raising [SLR] < or =60 degrees ) with either a short-term (2-4 weeks) severe or long-term (4-12 weeks) moderate leg pain. Forty patients were allocated to a single intravenous infusion of either infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo. Differences in the clinical examination parameters (straight leg raise [SLR], muscle strength, sensory defects, tendon reflexes), patient-reported symptoms (leg and back pain using a visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry disability, quality-of-life [RAND-36]), sick leaves, number of discectomies, and adverse effects between the two treatment groups over the 1-year follow-up were compared using Mann-Whitney U test or Student's t test, repeated-measures analysis, or Cox proportional hazards model. Logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of good response.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of patients in the infliximab group reported no pain at 52 weeks compared with 63% in the control group (P = 0.72). Similar efficacy was observed between treatment groups for other outcomes. Eight patients in each group required surgery. Three nonserious adverse reactions were encountered in the infliximab group. The response (irrespective of the treatment) was significantly better with shorter symptom duration and less SLR restriction at baseline. Patients in the infliximab group appeared to especially benefit in cases of a L4-L5 (or L3-L4) herniation and if a Modic change was colocalized at the symptomatic level.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the long-term results of this randomized trial do not support the use of infliximab compared with placebo for lumbar radicular pain in patients with disc herniation-induced sciatica, further study in a subgroup of patients with L4-L5 or L3-L4 herniations, especially in the presence of Modic changes, appears to be warranted.
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in a randomized controlled setting.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recently, we obtained encouraging results in an open-label study of infliximab in patients with disc herniation-induced sciatica. Furthermore, the results of experimental studies support the use of infliximab in sciatica. Therefore, we initiated a randomized, controlled trial (FIRST II, Finnish Infliximab Related STudy) to confirm the efficacy of a single infusion of infliximab for sciatic pain.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were unilateral moderate to severe sciatic pain with an MRI-confirmed disc herniation concordant with the symptoms and signs of radicular pain. Patients had to be candidates for discectomy, as evaluated by an independent orthopedic surgeon. Forty patients were allocated to a single intravenous infusion of either infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo. Assessments at baseline and various time points included clinical examination with measurement of straight leg raising restriction; questionnaires related to subjective symptoms (leg and back pain by 100-mm visual analog scale, Oswestry disability); sick leaves; number of discectomies; and adverse effects possibly related to treatment. The primary endpoint was a reduction in leg pain from baseline to 12 weeks, which was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and repeated-measures analysis.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in leg pain was observed in both groups, with no significant difference between treatment regimens. Similar efficacy was observed between treatment groups for secondary endpoints. Seven patients in each group required surgery. No adverse effects related to treatment were encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this randomized trial do not support the use of infliximab for lumbar radicular pain in patients with disc herniation-induced sciatica.
STUDY DESIGN: An open-label trial.
OBJECTIVES: To test the long-term efficacy of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), in disc herniation-induced sciatica.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Our recent trial indicated that a single infusion of 3 mg/weight-kg of infliximab produced a rapid curative effect in disc herniation-induced sciatica. Here, we describe the 1-year effect of a 3 mg/kg of infliximab in these 10 patients and our experience with a lower dose of 1 mg/kg of infliximab for the same indication in 2 additional patients.
METHODS: Patients with severe sciatica were treated with a single infusion of infliximab, 3 mg/weight-kg in 10 patients and 1 mg/kg in 2 patients, intravenously over 2 hours. The outcomes (leg and back pain on a 100-mm visual scale, Oswestry disability, clinical signs) were assessed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the infusion. The outcomes with 3 mg/kg of infliximab were compared to 62 patients who received periradicular saline for sciatica in a previous trial. The resorption rate of disc herniations from baseline to 1 year was compared between infliximab and control groups.
RESULTS: The response to 1 mg/kg of infliximab for leg pain was good only in 1 of the 2 patients treated, whereas the response to 3 mg/kg of infliximab for leg pain was sustained in most patients over the 1-year follow-up. The 1-year response significantly favored 3 mg/kg of infliximab over periradicular saline in leg pain (P = 0.005) and disability (P = 0.003). Neurologic abnormalities normalized more comprehensively in the infliximab group (P = 0.001). Reduction in disc herniation volume did not differ between the infliximab-treated patients and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the beneficial effect of a single infusion of 3 mg/kg of infliximab for herniation-induced sciatica is sustained in most patients over a 1-year follow-up period. Furthermore, infliximab does not seem to interfere with the spontaneous resorption of disc herniations.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the efficacy of a tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitor (etanercept, Enbrel) in patients with severe sciatica.
METHODS: A pilot study of etanercept was conducted in patients admitted to hospital for acute severe sciatica. Ten consecutive patients received three subcutaneous injections of etanercept (25 mg every 3 days) in addition to standard analgesia. Response was evaluated at day 10 (T1) and week 6 (T2) using a visual analogue scale for leg pain (VASL) and for low back pain (VASB), and two validated functional scores: the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). The control group consisted of 10 patients with severe sciatica, who took part in an observational study on i.v. methylprednisolone.
RESULTS: In the etanercept group all variables improved: VASB from 36 to 7; VASL from 74 to 12; RMDQ from 17.8 to 5.8, and ODI from 75.4 to 17.3; all p<0.001. Pain (VASL and VASB: p<0.001) and ODI (p<0.05) were significantly better in the etanercept group than in the methylprednisolone group.
CONCLUSION: In this open, historical group controlled study, patients with severe sciatica had sustained improvement after a short treatment with etanercept that was better than standard care plus a short course of methylprednisolone. These results suggest that inhibition of TNFalpha is beneficial in the treatment of sciatica and support a pathological role for TNFalpha in the pathogenesis of sciatica. These results need to be confirmed by a randomised controlled trial.
Perineural inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor have recently generated intense interest as an alternative to epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate whether epidural steroids, etanercept, or saline better improves pain and function in adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
DESIGN:
A multicenter, 3-group, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from 2008 to 2011. Randomization was computer-generated and stratified by site. Pharmacists prepared the syringes. Patients, treating physicians, and nurses assessing outcomes were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00733096)
SETTING:
Military and civilian treatment centers.
PATIENTS:
84 adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy of less than 6 months' duration.
INTERVENTION:
2 epidural injections of steroids, etanercept, or saline, mixed with bupivacaine and separated by 2 weeks.
MEASUREMENTS:
The primary outcome measure was leg pain 1 month after the second injection. All patients had 1-month follow-up visits; patients whose condition improved remained blinded for the 6-month study period.
RESULTS:
The group that received epidural steroids had greater reductions in the primary outcome measure than those who received saline (mean difference, -1.26 [95% CI, -2.79 to 0.27]; P = 0.11) or etanercept (mean difference, -1.01 [CI, -2.60 to 0.58]; P = 0.21). For back pain, smaller differences favoring steroids compared with saline (mean difference, -0.52 [CI, -1.85 to 0.81]; P = 0.44) and etanercept (mean difference, -0.92 [CI,-2.28 to 0.44]; P = 0.18) were observed. The largest differences were noted for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etanercept (mean difference, -16.16 [CI, -26.05 to -6.27]; P = 0.002), steroids vs. saline (mean difference, -5.87 [CI, -15.59 to 3.85]; P = 0.23), and etanercept vs. saline (mean difference, 10.29 [CI, 0.55 to 20.04]; P = 0.04). More patients treated with epidural steroids (75%) reported 50% or greater leg pain relief and a positive global perceived effect at 1 month than those who received saline (50%) or etanercept (42%) (P = 0.09).
LIMITATION:
Short-term follow-up, small sample size, and a possibly subtherapeutic dose of etanercept.
CONCLUSION:
Epidural steroid injections may provide modest short-term pain relief for some adults with lumbosacral radiculopathy, but larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm their benefits.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE:
The John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, International Spinal Intervention Society, and Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research.
