BACKGROUND: Lumbar facet joint degeneration is a source of chronic low back pain, with an incidence of 15% to 45% among patients with low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques in the treatment of facet-related pain have been described in the literature, including intraarticular lumbar facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of intraarticular facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation.
METHODS: Our randomized, double-blind, controlled study included patients who received intraarticular steroid infiltrations in the lumbar facet joints (L3/L4-L5/S1) and patients who underwent radiofrequency denervation of L3/L4-L5/S1 segments. The inclusion criteria were based first on magnetic resonance imaging findings showing hypertrophy of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 and a positive response to an intraarticular test infiltration of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 with local anesthetics. The primary end point was the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Secondary end points were the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 months.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were randomized; 24 of 29 patients in the steroid injection group and 26 of 27 patients in the denervation group completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain relief and functional improvement were observed in both groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for the primary end point (95% confidence interval [CI], -3 to 4) and for both secondary end points (95% CI for visual analog scale, -2 to 1; 95% CI for Oswestry Disability Index, -18 to 0).
CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular steroid infiltration or radiofrequency denervation appear to be a managing option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet origin with favorable short- and midterm results in terms of pain relief and function improvement, but improvements were similar in both groups.
BACKGROUND: An alternative technique involving a "distal approach" can be used for lumbar medial branch radiofrequency denervation (LMBRFD). We described and assessed this technique by comparing it with a conventional tunnel vision approach in a prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: Eighty-two patients underwent LMBRFD by a distal (n = 41) or a tunnel vision approach (n = 41). The primary end point was a comparison of the mean difference in the change of 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of low back pain from entry to the scores at 1 month (NRS at baseline--NRS at 1 month) and at 6 months (NRS at baseline--NRS at 6 months) between the distal approach group and the tunnel vision approach group. The secondary end points were a change of NRS and the Oswestry disability index over time.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in each group had complete time courses. There were no statistically significant differences in the change of NRS scores between the groups at 1 month (corrected P = 0.19; 97.5% 2-sided confidence interval [CI], -1.37 to 0.37) and 6 months (corrected P = 0.53; 97.5% CI, -1.36 to 0.77). Patients in both groups showed a statistically significant reduction in NRS and Oswestry disability index scores from baseline to that of the scores at 1 and 6 months (all P < 0.0001, Bonferroni corrected). The procedure-related pain score was significantly lower in the distal approach group (P = 0.001; 99% CI, -2.00 to -0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent LMBRFD by the tunnel vision or distal approaches showed significant pain relief at the 6-month follow-up. Less periprocedural pain was reported in the distal approach group. We consider that the distal approach provides an improved option for LMBRFD.
AIM: The study was conducted to compare the clinical effectiveness of FJ injections (FJI) and FJ radiofrequency (FJRF) denervation in patients with chronic low back pain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 100 patients; 50 in FJI 50 in FJRF group. VNS, NASS and EQ-5D were used to evaluate the outcomes. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
RESULTS: FJI in early post-op but FJRF in 1st, 6th and 12th month VNS showed better results (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 1st (p=1) and 6th month (p=0.13) but in 12th month (p=0.04) in NASS. Increase in level number showed positive effect in NASS in FJRF group (p=0.018) but no effect in FJI group (p=0.823) in the 12th month follow-up. There was no significant difference with respect to 1st month (p=0.17), 6th month (p=0.22) and 12th month (p=0.11) post-procedure follow-ups in EQ-5D. At the short term FJI was more effective than FJRF however in midterm follow-up FJRF had more satisfying results than FJRF.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, the first choice should be the FJI and if pain reoccurs after a period of time or injection is not effective, RF procedure should be used for the treatment of chronic lumbar pain.
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to identify the most important determinants from the patient history and clinical examination in diagnosing musculoskeletal chest pain (MSCP) in patients with acute noncardiac chest pain when supported by a structured protocol and to construct a decision tree for identification of MSCP in acute noncardiac chest pain.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with noncardiac chest pain (n = 302) recruited from an emergency cardiology department were assessed. Using data from self-report questionnaires, interviews, and clinical assessment, patient characteristics were associated with the MSCP diagnosis, and the decision-making process of the clinician was reconstructed using recursive procedures in the tradition of constructing Classification and Regression Trees.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of patients had MSCP. There was no single determinant that predicted the condition completely. However, many items with high associations could be identified, mainly with high negative predictive value. The decision-making process was reconstructed giving rise to a 5-step, linear decision tree without branches.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians use a combination of indicators including systematic palpation of the spine and chest wall and items from the case history to diagnose MSCP. However, the high negative predictive values of the main determinants suggest that the MSCP diagnosis may be a diagnosis by exclusion.
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis clinically presents with recurrent episodes of dysphagia and food impaction. Recently, we observed patients with noncardiac chest pain and eosinophilic oesophagitis.
AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of abnormal eosinophilic infiltration in noncardiac chest pain patients and examine diagnostic utility of demographic, clinical and endoscopic variables to predict eosinophilic oesophagitis.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 171 consecutive patients referred for EGD evaluation of noncardiac chest pain. Endoscopic signs consistent with eosinophilic oesophagitis were recorded. The histological findings were grouped as normal: 0-5 eosinophils/high power field (e/hpf), indeterminate: 6-20 e/hpf, and eosinophilic oesophagitis: ≥21 e/hpf. Abnormal eosinophilic infiltration was defined as ≥6 e/hpf.
RESULTS: Abnormal eosinophilic infiltrate was noted in 24 patients (14%). Thirteen (8%) had indeterminate counts, while 11 (6%) had eosinophilic oesophagitis. Compared with normal, those with abnormal oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration were more likely to be male (71% vs. 34%, P=0.001), have allergies (29% vs. 12%, P=0.050), have current GER symptoms (42% vs. 18%, P=0.013), rings (54% vs. 22%, P=0.002), furrows (21% vs. 1%, P<0.001) and abnormal eosinophilic oesophagitis findings on endoscopy (67% vs. 32%, P=0.001). Of the 24 abnormal patients, 23 (96%) were either male or had rings, furrows, or white specks. Conversely, 68 of 69 patients (99%) who were female did not have rings, furrows, or white specks, and endoscopy was normal. Eight patients (33%) with abnormal eosinophilic infiltration had a normal endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic oesophagitis should be considered in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain. Our findings suggest that oesophageal biopsies should be obtained particularly in males with recurrent unexplained chest pain, whether endoscopy is normal or abnormal.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to demonstrate the derivation and the preliminary validation of a brief screening score to improve recognition of panic-like anxiety in emergency department (ED) patients with unexplained chest pain.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 507 ED patients with unexplained chest pain randomly assigned to the derivation condition (n = 201) or the validation condition (n = 306). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV) acted as the criterion standard for panic diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine which of the sociodemographic, medical, and questionnaire response variables best predicted the presence of panic-like anxiety in the derivation condition. The selected predictors were entered in a logistic regression analysis to determine variables to be included in the screening score. The predictive validity of the resulting score was evaluated in both conditions.
RESULTS: The four-item Panic Screening Score (PSS) identified panic-like anxiety with a sensitivity of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 52% to 73%) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI = 76% to 90%) in the derivation phase. The positive predictive value was 74% (95% CI = 62% to 93%) and the negative predictive value was 76% (95% CI = 68% to 89%). In the validation phase, the sensitivity and specificity were 53% (95% CI = 44% to 62%) and 85% (95% CI = 78% to 89%), respectively. The positive predictive value was 72% (95% CI = 62% to 80%) and the negative predictive value was 71% (95% CI = 65% to 77%).
CONCLUSIONS: The PSS may be useful to identify patients with unexplained chest pain who could benefit from referral to mental health professionals or their primary care providers for evaluation of panic attack and panic disorder. Prospective studies to improve and validate the PSS, followed by impact analysis, are mandatory before clinical implementation.
OBJECTIVES: The value of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) indicators (acid exposure time (AET), symptom association probability (SAP), and symptom index (SI)) in predicting therapeutic success in noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) has not been systematically evaluated in outcome studies.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 98 subjects with NCCP (age 51.8+/-1.2 years, 75 women, mean duration of symptoms 7.3+/-0.4 years) who underwent pH monitoring off antireflux therapy. Distal esophageal AET (abnormal if > or = 4.0%), SAP (measured as Ghillibert probability estimate, abnormal if P<0.05), and SI (abnormal if > or = 50%) were calculated; symptom severity and change after therapy were assessed on a 10-point Likert scale. Subjects were interviewed 2.8+/-0.9 years after the pH study to determine the degree of symptom change (high-degree response (HDR), with definite, sustained symptom improvement) after antireflux therapy. Regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of HDR.
RESULTS: GERD indicators were present in 61 subjects (62.2%); 52 subjects (53.1%) had abnormal AET, 26 (26.5%) had positive SAP, and 25 (25.5%) had positive SI. With therapy, mean symptom scores improved from 6.3+/-0.3 at the time of the pH study to 2.9+/-0.3 at the time of interview (P<0.001). A total of 58 subjects (59.2%) achieved HDR, and another 29.6% had moderate symptom improvement. On univariate analysis, HDR was associated with positive SAP (P=0.003) and elevated AET (P=0.015) but not with demographics, SI, or esophageal motor pattern. In regression analysis containing demographics, GERD indicators, psychiatric comorbidity, and esophageal motor pattern, positive SAP was retained as a significant predictor of HDR (P=0.003); elevated AET trended toward significance (P=0.055). Frequency of HDR was highest when subjects had all three GERD parameters abnormal (93.3% HDR) or both elevated AET and positive SAP (88.2% HDR, P<0.001 compared with only one or no GERD parameter abnormal).
CONCLUSIONS: Positive statistical tests of symptom association predict the therapeutic success of GERD management in NCCP. When used hierarchically, response to antireflux therapy is best predicted when GERD parameters are all abnormal and poorest when parameters are normal. These results support the importance of GERD, the relevance of symptom association testing during ambulatory pH monitoring, and the value of intensive antireflux therapy in NCCP.
BACKGROUND: Chest wall syndrome (CWS) is the most frequent aetiology of chest pain in a primary care setting.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study are to describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and prognosis of CWS and to provide a simple decision rule for diagnosis.
METHODS: We included 1212 consecutive patients with chest pain aged 35 years and older attending 74 GPs. GPs recorded symptoms and findings of each patient and provided follow-up information. An independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the aetiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors that help to rule in or out the diagnosis of CWS.
RESULTS: GPs diagnosed pain originating from the chest wall in 46.6% of all patients. In most patients, pain was localized retrosternal (52.0%) and/or on the left side (69.2%). In total, 28.0% of CWS patients showed persistent pain and most patients reported no temporal association of pain (72.3%). In total, 55.4% of patients still had chest pain after 6 months. A simple score containing four determinants (localized muscle tension, stinging pain, pain reproducible by palpation and absence of cough) shows an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: This study broadens the knowledge about pain characteristics and the diagnostic accuracy of selected signs and symptoms for CWS. A simple four-point score can help the GP in the diagnostic workup of chest pain patients.
<b>STUDY DESIGN: </b>A randomized controlled study of percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy was conducted in 40 patients with chronic low back pain (20 active and 20 controls). <b>OBJECTIVE: </b>The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible beneficial effect of percutaneous radiofrequency zygapophysial joint neurotomy in reducing pain and physical impairment in patients with pain from the lumbar zygapophysial joints, selected after repeated diagnostic blocks. <b>Summary Of Background Data: </b>Facet or zygapophysial joint pain may be one of the causes of chronic low back pain and may be treated by a percutaneous radiofrequency denervation. Patients may possibly be identified by a positive diagnostic block. These blocks need to be repeated as false positive responses to single blocks occur.In all previous studies patients treated with radiofrequency denervation have been selected after single diagnostic blocks resulting in a varying degree of relief. <b>METHODS: </b>All patients were examined by an orthopedic surgeon before and 6 months after the treatment (sham or active). Inclusion criteria were 3 separate positive facet blocks. Denervation was achieved by multiple lesions at each level in an effort to provide effective denervation. <b>RESULTS: </b>The active treatment group showed statistically significant improvement not only in back and leg pain but also back and hip movement as well as the sacro-iliac joint test. Pre operative sensory deficit and weak or absent ankle reflex normalized (P < 0.01) and (P < 0.05), respectively. There was significant improvement in quality of life variables, global perception of improvement, and generalized pain.The improvement seen in the active group was significantly greater then that seen in the placebo group with regard to all the above-mentioned variables. None of our patients had any complication other than transient postoperative pain that was easily managed. <b>CONCLUSION: </b>Our study indicates that radiofrequency facet denervation is not a placebo and could be used in the treatment of carefully selected patients with chronic low back pain.
Lumbar facet joint degeneration is a source of chronic low back pain, with an incidence of 15% to 45% among patients with low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques in the treatment of facet-related pain have been described in the literature, including intraarticular lumbar facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of intraarticular facet joint steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation.
METHODS:
Our randomized, double-blind, controlled study included patients who received intraarticular steroid infiltrations in the lumbar facet joints (L3/L4-L5/S1) and patients who underwent radiofrequency denervation of L3/L4-L5/S1 segments. The inclusion criteria were based first on magnetic resonance imaging findings showing hypertrophy of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 and a positive response to an intraarticular test infiltration of the facet joints L3/L4-L5/S1 with local anesthetics. The primary end point was the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Secondary end points were the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 months.
RESULTS:
Fifty-six patients were randomized; 24 of 29 patients in the steroid injection group and 26 of 27 patients in the denervation group completed the 6-month follow-up. Pain relief and functional improvement were observed in both groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for the primary end point (95% confidence interval [CI], -3 to 4) and for both secondary end points (95% CI for visual analog scale, -2 to 1; 95% CI for Oswestry Disability Index, -18 to 0).
CONCLUSIONS:
Intraarticular steroid infiltration or radiofrequency denervation appear to be a managing option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet origin with favorable short- and midterm results in terms of pain relief and function improvement, but improvements were similar in both groups.
