AbstractBackground:The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to describe change in employment status over time in patients with schizophrenia.METHODS:Data were from three 52-week open-label extensions of the double-blind pivotal trials of paliperidone extended-release (ER) (trial numbers NCT00650793, NCT00210769 and NCT00668837). Employment status prior to trial entry was recorded at baseline of the open-label phase and change was measured at 4-week intervals. Patients were included if they were in the open-label, intent-to-treat analysis set (i.e., received at least one dose of the study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement) and had valid dates in the productivity data. Employment categories included full-time, part-time, casual, sheltered work, unemployed but seeking work, unemployed and not seeking work, retired, not employed outside the home and student. Change in employment status from baseline to post-baseline (last visit) was assessed using McNemar’s test.RESULTS:Of the 1077 patients enrolled in the open-label extensions, 1012 (94.0) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 37.7 years (SD 10.9) and 59.1 were male. At baseline, the largest percentage of patients was unemployed and not seeking work (56.8), followed by retired (14.9) and unemployed but seeking work (11.7). Five different definitions of employment were created. Employment rates increased according to all five definitions (p < 0.0001), ranging from a 43 increase according to the definition most similar to that used by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics to an increase of 114 when only part-time and full-time employment were considered.CONCLUSION:In this uncontrolled population of patients with schizophrenia who were treated with paliperidone ER, the percentage of patients who were employed increased over time. By using multiple measures of employment, researchers can identify the nature of the employment status change.
BACKGROUND: To examine potential differences in efficacy and safety of treatment with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia of white and black descent.
METHODS: A post-hoc, pooled analysis of 6 randomized, double-blind trials in the treatment of schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder compared white (N = 605) and black (N = 375) patients treated with olanzapine (5 to 20 mg/day) for 24 to 28 weeks. Efficacy measurements included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; and positive, negative, and general psychopathology scores; and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scores at 6 months. Safety measures included differences in the frequencies of adverse events along with measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight, glucose, and lipid changes over time.
RESULTS: 51% of black patients and 45% of white patients experienced early study discontinuation (P = .133). Of those who discontinued, significantly more white patients experienced psychiatric worsening (P = .002) while significantly more black patients discontinued for reasons other than efficacy or tolerability (P = .014). Discontinuation for intolerability was not different between groups (P = .320). For the estimated change in PANSS total score over 6 months, there was no significant difference in efficacy between white and black patients (P = .928), nor on the estimated PANSS positive (P = .435), negative (P = .756) or general psychopathology (P = .165) scores. Overall, there was no significant difference in the change in CGI-S score between groups from baseline to endpoint (P = .979). Weight change was not significantly different in white and black patients over 6 months (P = .127). However, mean weight change was significantly greater in black versus white patients at Weeks 12 and 20 only (P = .028 and P = .026, respectively). Additionally, a significantly greater percentage of black patients experienced clinically significant weight gain (≥ 7%) at anytime compared to white patients (36.1% vs. 30.4%, P = .021). Changes across metabolic parameters (combined fasting and random lipids and glucose) were also not significantly different between groups, with the exception of a greater categorical change in total cholesterol from borderline to high among white subjects and a categorical change from normal to low in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol among white males.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings did not demonstrate overall substantive differences in efficacy or safety between white and black patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or related disorders treated with olanzapine. However, a significantly greater percentage of black patients (36.1%) experienced clinically significant weight gain compared to white patients (30.4%).
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of paliperidone extended-release tablets (paliperidone ER) in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia have been described in 3 randomized, double-blind, 6-week, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, Phase III clinical trials. The validity and reliability of the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale, both in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia and those with stabilized symptoms, have also been reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to estimate the treatment benefit of paliperidone ER compared with placebo in terms of improvements in personal and social functioning as measured by the PSP scale in 3 controlled clinical trials. METHODS: Data were derived from 3 paliperidone ER multicenter Phase III pivotal studies of patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia. Each study included a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, 6-week treatment period with an open-label extension of paliperidone ER treatment. Patients were randomized to receive paliperidone ER, olanzapine 10 mg, or placebo once daily. Paliperidone ER doses were 3, 9, and 15 mg/d in 1 study; 6, 9, and 12 mg/d in another; and 6 and 12 mg/d in the third. Collectively, 1306 intent-to-treat patients received placebo or paliperidone ER in these 3 trials. Most (61.7%) were white; 21.6% were black, 8.8% were Asian, and 7.9% were of another race. The mean age ranged from 36.3 to 39.4 years across treatment groups. Multiple analyses were applied to PSP data (for which higher scores indicate better personal and social functioning) from these paliperidone ER studies: between-group minimum important difference (MID) estimates; responder analyses; between-group cumulative frequency comparisons of PSP change from baseline to end point; and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) estimates. RESULTS: Standardized differences and effect sizes between paliperidone ER and placebo in PSP mean change from baseline to end point ranged from 0.52 to 0.85 for all paliperidone ER doses. Observed between-group differences (paliperidone ER minus placebo) in PSP mean change from baseline to end point exceeded the between-group MID of 7 points at all paliperidone ER doses. The percentage of patients achieving at least one 10-point category improvement in the PSP was higher with all paliperidone ER doses (range, 49.6%-63.6%) than placebo (33.1%) (P < 0.005). Across the distribution of all possible PSP scores, the percentage of patients achieving any level of change appeared to be greater for paliperidone ER than for placebo at all doses. Derived NNTs for improved personal and social functioning based on paliperidone ER trials ranged from 3.3 to 6.1. The improvement in personal and social functioning achieved by patients receiving paliperidone ER during the double-blind studies was maintained throughout the 52-week, open-label extension studies, as assessed using multiple definitions of response; subjects in the placebo arm during doubleblind treatment appeared to achieve and maintain improved functioning when switched to paliperidone ER for the extension studies. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that paliperidone ER had a meaningful treatment benefit with respect to improving personal and social functioning in these patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.
This research compared the long-term efficacy and safety of iloperidone with those of haloperidol in individuals with schizophrenia. Data were pooled from 3 prospective multicenter studies, each with 6-week stabilization followed by 46-week double-blind maintenance phases. Patients were randomized to iloperidone 4 to 16 mg/d or haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/d. Patients included in this analysis completed the initial 6-week phase with at least 20% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at weeks 4 and 6, had 7-item Clinical Global Impressions of Change (CGI-C) scores less than 4, received 1 or more doses of long-term phase medication, and had 1 or more efficacy/safety assessments during the long-term phase. The primary efficacy variable was time to relapse, defined as a 25% or more increase in PANSS total score, including at least a 10-point change; discontinuation because of lack of efficacy; aggravated psychosis with hospitalization; or 2-point increase in the 7-item CGI-C after week 6. Of 1644 patients randomized and 1326 completing the 6-week phase, 473 (iloperidone, n = 359; haloperidol, n = 114) were included in the long-term efficacy analysis, and 489 (iloperidone, n = 371; haloperidol, n = 118) in the safety analysis. Iloperidone was equivalent to haloperidol in time to relapse. The most common adverse events were insomnia (18.1%), anxiety (10.8%), and schizophrenia aggravated (8.9%) with iloperidone, and insomnia (16.9%), akathisia (14.4%), tremor (12.7%), and muscle rigidity (12.7%) with haloperidol. The Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale scores improved with iloperidone and worsened with haloperidol. Metabolic changes were minimal for both groups. Mean changes in Fridericia's QT interval correction were 10.3 msec (iloperidone) and 9.4 msec (haloperidol) at end point. Iloperidone demonstrated long-term efficacy equivalent to haloperidol and a favorable long-term safety profile, potentially making this agent a suitable option as maintenance therapy for schizophrenia.
Long-term efficacy and safety of paliperidone extended-release tablets (3-12 mg/day) were evaluated in pooled data from 52-week open-label extension (OLE) phases of three 6-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind (DB) trials involving 1083 schizophrenia patients. Forty-seven percent of patients completed the OLE phase. Outcome measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Personal and Social Performance scale scores. Improvements observed on both scales in active treatment groups during the DB phases were maintained during the OLE phase. Most commonly (> or =10% patients) reported adverse events (AEs) were insomnia, headache, and akathisia. One or more serious AEs were reported by 16% of patients; two patients had a treatment-emergent AE that resulted in death (suicide). Extrapyramidal symptom-related AEs were reported by 25% of patients. Median maximum movement disorder rating scale scores indicated no severity change during the OLE. Mean (+/-SD) increase in body weight from OLE baseline to end point was 1.1+/-5.47 kg across treatment groups and there were no clinically meaningful changes for plasma glucose, insulin or lipid levels. This analysis shows that paliperidone extended-release can maintain improvements in symptoms and functioning and is generally well tolerated for up to 52 weeks in schizophrenia patients.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of aripiprazole across symptoms in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
METHODS: Data were pooled from five, 4-6-week acute studies. PANSS Total, Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathology Subscale improvements were analyzed, as well as all 30 individual PANSS items.
RESULTS: Aripiprazole had statistically significant decreases versus placebo on PANSS subscales at Week 4, similar to those seen with haloperidol. Aripiprazole-treated patients also showed significant decreases versus placebo in 26 of the 30 PANSS items (all p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole demonstrates statistically and clinically significant efficacy across a range of symptoms in schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND: There are claims that second-generation antipsychotics produce fewer extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) compared with first-generation drugs.
AIMS: To compare the incidence of treatment-emergent EPS between second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in people with schizophrenia.
METHOD: Incidence analyses integrated data from standardised rating scales and documented use of concomitant medication or treatment discontinuation for EPS events. Mixed model analyses of change in rating scales from baseline were also conducted.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in incidence or change in rating scales for parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia or tardive dyskinesia when comparing second-generation antipsychotics with perphenazine or comparing between second-generation antipsychotics. Secondary analyses revealed greater rates of concomitant antiparkinsonism medication among individuals on risperidone and lower rates among individuals on quetiapine, and lower rates of discontinuation because of parkinsonism among people on quetiapine and ziprasidone. There was a trend for a greater likelihood of concomitant medication for akathisia among individuals on risperidone and perphenazine.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of treatment-emergent EPS and change in EPS ratings indicated that there are no significant differences between second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine or between second-generation antipsychotics in people with schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND: The Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) has defined criteria for symptomatic remission based on achieving and maintaining a consistently low symptom threshold for at least six consecutive months. This analysis examined symptomatic remission in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia receiving either aripiprazole or haloperidol for one year.
METHODS: Pooled data from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trials of aripiprazole and haloperidol in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia were analyzed. Measures of symptomatic remission were calculated according to RSWG criteria.
RESULTS: Remission rates were significantly higher for patients treated with aripiprazole compared with haloperidol (32% vs 22%, respectively; p<0.001, LOCF). Among remitters, aripiprazole-treated patients achieved symptom criteria in a significantly shorter time than haloperidol-treated patients (log rank p=0.0024). For trial completers, remission rates were similarly high in both groups (aripiprazole, 77%; haloperidol, 74%). Regardless of treatment type, remitters received significantly higher global clinical ratings than nonremitters (p<0.0001). Aripiprazole was associated with a significantly lower rate of discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) than haloperidol (8.0% vs 18.4%, respectively; p<0.001) as well as lower concomitant medication use for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (23% vs 57%, respectively; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Acutely ill schizophrenia patients treated with aripiprazole demonstrated a significantly higher rate of symptomatic remission across 52 weeks compared with haloperidol-treated patients. The similar remission rates among trial completers in both treatment groups, combined with fewer AE-related discontinuations and lower EPS medication use in the aripiprazole group, suggest that better tolerability with aripiprazole may have contributed to superior overall remission rates.
Antipsychotic treatment discontinuation can be used to measure overall treatment effectiveness. Our goal was to investigate differential treatment discontinuation comparing olanzapine with other atypical antipsychotics. A post hoc pooled analysis of 4 randomized, double-blind, 24- to 28-week schizophrenia clinical trials included 822 olanzapine-treated and 805 risperidone-, quetiapine-, or ziprasidone-treated patients. A checklist was used to record the reason for discontinuation. Treatment differences were assessed between olanzapine and the other 3 antipsychotics combined. Poor response/symptom worsening was the primary reason for discontinuation, regardless of medication. The rate of discontinuation due to poor response/symptom worsening significantly varied by treatment (olanzapine, 14.23%, vs. other atypical antipsychotics, 24.60%; P < 0.0001). The rate of discontinuation due to intolerability of medication did not significantly vary by treatment (olanzapine, 5.60%, vs. other atypical antipsychotics, 7.45%; P = 0.13). Consequent to the differential rates of discontinuation due to poor response/symptom worsening, the olanzapine-treated patients experienced a significantly greater likelihood of overall treatment completion (53.9% vs. 39.3%; P < 0.001) and a significantly longer duration of treatment (19.1 vs. 16.1 weeks; P < 0.0001) than other atypical-treated patients. The predominant reason for the significantly lower discontinuation rate of treatment for patients taking olanzapine compared with that of patients taking other atypical antipsychotics was the significantly higher dropout rates in other atypical antipsychotics because of poor response/symptom worsening.
AbstractBackground:The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to describe change in employment status over time in patients with schizophrenia.
METHODS:
Data were from three 52-week open-label extensions of the double-blind pivotal trials of paliperidone extended-release (ER) (trial numbers NCT00650793, NCT00210769 and NCT00668837). Employment status prior to trial entry was recorded at baseline of the open-label phase and change was measured at 4-week intervals. Patients were included if they were in the open-label, intent-to-treat analysis set (i.e., received at least one dose of the study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement) and had valid dates in the productivity data. Employment categories included full-time, part-time, casual, sheltered work, unemployed but seeking work, unemployed and not seeking work, retired, not employed outside the home and student. Change in employment status from baseline to post-baseline (last visit) was assessed using McNemar’s test.
RESULTS:
Of the 1077 patients enrolled in the open-label extensions, 1012 (94.0) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 37.7 years (SD 10.9) and 59.1 were male. At baseline, the largest percentage of patients was unemployed and not seeking work (56.8), followed by retired (14.9) and unemployed but seeking work (11.7). Five different definitions of employment were created. Employment rates increased according to all five definitions (p < 0.0001), ranging from a 43 increase according to the definition most similar to that used by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics to an increase of 114 when only part-time and full-time employment were considered.
CONCLUSION:
In this uncontrolled population of patients with schizophrenia who were treated with paliperidone ER, the percentage of patients who were employed increased over time. By using multiple measures of employment, researchers can identify the nature of the employment status change.
