Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
15 articles (15 References) Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Diabetologia
Year 2005
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The largely unsatisfactory results reported for the pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathy has spurred the search for alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) as a novel treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: Patients (n=31) with painful neuropathy associated with decreased nerve conduction velocity (<40 m/s) and increased vibration perception threshold (>25 V) were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study designed to compare the effects of FREMS with those of placebo. Each patient received two series of ten treatments of either FREMS or placebo in random sequence, with each series lasting no more than 3 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in pain measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: FREMS induced a significant reduction in daytime and night-time VAS pain score (all p<0.02). Furthermore, FREMS induced a significant increase in sensory tactile perception, as assessed by monofilament; a decrease in foot vibration perception threshold, as measured by a biothesiometer; and an increase in motor nerve conduction velocity (all p<0.01). No significant changes were observed after placebo. Comparison of measurements at the 4-month follow-up with those at baseline revealed that a significant benefit persisted for all measures that showed an improvement at the end of treatment, with an additional improvement in quality of life evaluated by the Short Form-36 questionnaire (all p<0.05). No significant side effects were recorded during the study. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: FREMS is a safe and effective therapy for neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes and is able to modify some parameters of peripheral nerve function.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Zhang XY
Journal Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion
Year 2005
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To search for an effective method for increasing therapeutic effect on trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS: Ninety cases of primary trigeminal neuralgia were randomly divided into a deep needling group and a routine needling group, 45 cases in each group. The routine needling group were treated by shallow acupuncture at local acupoints and distal acupoints along the Hand and Foot-Yangming Channels, and the deep needling group were treated by acupuncture at the above acupoints and deeply needling at the local acupoints to nerve stem for 3 courses. RESULTS: In the deep needling group 12 cases were clinically cured, 24 cases were markedly effective, 7 cases improved and 2 cases were ineffective, with a total effective rate of 95.6%; and in the routine needling group, the corresponding figures were 7, 15, 12, 11, 75.6%. The therapeutic effect in the deep needling group was better than that in the routine needling group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Deeply needling local acupoints plus acupuncture at distal acupoints along the Hand and Foot-Yangming Channels can increase significantly the therapeutic effect on trigeminal neuralgia.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Cheing GL , Luk ML
Journal Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Year 2005
This study examined the clinical effectiveness of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for reducing hypersensitivity of the hand. Nineteen patients suffering from hand hypersensitivity were randomly assigned into either a treatment or a placebo group. A visual analogue scale and the Downey Hand Centre Hand Sensitivity Test were used to measure the tactile tolerance of the hand. Grip strength was assessed by a grip dynamometer. Daily applications of electrical stimulation were provided for 2 weeks. Significantly lower pain scores were found in the treatment group than in the placebo group by Day 7 and Day 11. The ranking of ten dowel textures of the Downey Hand Centre Hand Sensitivity Test in the treatment group was significantly higher than in the placebo group by Day 7 and Day 11. However, no significant inter-group difference was found in grip strength.

Publication Thread

GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [provisional name] (Cannabis based medicine for multiple sclerosis [provisional name])

This thread includes 5 references

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Moseley GL
Journal Pain
Year 2004
Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) involves cortical abnormalities similar to those observed in phantom pain and after stroke. In those groups, treatment is aimed at activation of cortical networks that subserve the affected limb, for example mirror therapy. However, mirror therapy is not effective for chronic CRPS1, possibly because movement of the limb evokes intolerable pain. It was hypothesised that preceding mirror therapy with activation of cortical networks without limb movement would reduce pain and swelling in patients with chronic CRPS1. Thirteen chronic CRPS1 patients were randomly allocated to a motor imagery program (MIP) or to ongoing management. The MIP consisted of two weeks each of a hand laterality recognition task, imagined hand movements and mirror therapy. After 12 weeks, the control group was crossed-over to MIP. There was a main effect of treatment group (F(1, 11) = 57, P < 0.01) and an effect size of approximately 25 points on the Neuropathic pain scale. The number needed to treat for a 50% reduction in NPS score was approximately 2. The effect of treatment was replicated in the crossed-over control subjects. The results uphold the hypothesis that a MIP initially not involving limb movement is effective for CRPS1 and support the involvement of cortical abnormalities in the development of this disorder. Although the mechanisms of effect of the MIP are not clear, possible explanations are sequential activation of cortical pre-motor and motor networks, or sustained and focussed attention on the affected limb, or both.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Diabetes, nutrition & metabolism
Year 2004
In a double blind, randomised study, 19 patients suffering from mild-to-moderate symptomatic diabetic neuropathy (Total Symptom Score, NTSS 4-16) received either treatment with the new transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device "Salutaris" (verum group) or a placebo treatment with an identical but electrically inactive device (placebo group). Stimulation pads were placed at the anatomical localisation of the peroneal nerve and stimulation was performed using a low frequency mode. At baseline (V1), after 6 (V2), and 12 (V3) wk of treatment, the patients' symptoms were registered using the new total symptom score (NTSS-6) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, sensory nerve thresholds (temperature, vibration, pain) and microvascular function were measured at the lower limb at baseline and after 12 wk of treatment. Active TENS-treatment resulted in a significant improvement in NTSS-6 score after 6 wk (-42%) and after 12 wk (-32%) of treatment (baseline: 10.0+/-3.3, 6 wk: 5.8+/-5.0, p<0.05; 12 wk: 6.8+/-3.9, p=0.05; placebo group: baseline: 7.6+/-3.1; 6 wk: 8.1+/-5.1, n.s.; 12 wk: 6.5+/-6.1, n.s.). Subanalysis of the different qualities of the NTSS-score revealed an improvement in numbness (2.2+/-1.0 to 1.6+/-1.3; p<0.03); lancinating pain (1.6+/-1.1 to 0.6+/-0.9; p<0.02) and allodynia (1.4+/-1.6 to 0.5+/-1.0; p<0.05). Also, a significant improvement in the VAS rating was found after 6 wk of TENS therapy (19.8+/-5.0 to 14.4+/-9.6; p<0.05), while no change was observed in the placebo arm. In conclusion, our study indicates that the new TENS device "Salutaris" is a convenient, non-pharmacological option for primary or adjuvant treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.

Publication Thread

Berman et al [provisional name] (Two cannabis-based medicinal extracts for brachial plexus avulsion [provisional name])

This thread includes 2 references

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal The American journal of medicine
Year 2003
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors De Grandis D , Minardi C
Journal Drugs in R&D
Year 2002
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of acetyl-L-carnitine (levacecarnine; LAC) versus placebo in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy, mainly by evaluating the effects of treatment on electrophysiological parameters and pain symptoms. DESIGN: This was a multicentre (n = 20), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. PATIENTS: 333 patients meeting clinical and/or neurophysiological criteria for diabetic neuropathy were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to treatment with LAC or placebo. LAC (or placebo) was started intramuscularly at a dosage of 1000 mg/day for 10 days and continued orally at a dosage of 2000 mg/day for the remainder of the study (355 days). MAIN OUTCOME PARAMETERS AND RESULTS: The main efficacy parameter was the effect of treatment on 6- and 12-month changes from baseline in nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and amplitude in the sensory (ulnar, sural and median) and motor (median, ulnar and peroneal) nerves. The effect of treatment on pain was also evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Among the 294 patients with impaired electrophysiological parameters at baseline, those treated with LAC showed a statistically significant improvement in mean NCV and amplitude compared with placebo (p < 0.01). The greatest changes in NCV (at 12 months) were observed in the sensory sural nerve (7 m/sec in the LAC group vs +1.0 m/sec in the placebo group), sensory ulnar nerve (+2.9 vs +0.1 m/sec, respectively) and motor peroneal nerve (+2.7 vs -0.2 m/sec), whereas the greatest changes in amplitude were recorded in the motor peroneal nerve (+2.2 vs +0.1 mV). After 12 months of treatment, mean VAS scores for pain were significantly reduced from baseline by 39% in LAC-treated patients (p < 0.0 vs baseline) compared with 8% in placebo recipients. LAC was well tolerated over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: LAC was effective and well tolerated in improving neurophysiological parameters and in reducing pain over a 1-year period. LAC is, therefore, a promising treatment option in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Pain
Year 2001
Tricyclic antidepressants are the mainstay of treatment of painful polyneuropathy but cannot be used in a substantial number of patients. St. John's wort is a herbal antidepressant, which may act via mechanisms similar to the tricyclics. The aim of this study was to test if St. John's wort would relieve painful polyneuropathy. The study design was randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and cross-over. Fifty-four patients were assigned to one of the two treatment sequences. The daily dose of St. John's wort was three tablets each containing 900 microg totalhypericin. During the two treatment periods of 5 weeks duration, patients rated constant pain, lancinating pain paroxysms, touch-evoked pain and pain on pressure by use of 0--10 point numeric rating scales. Forty-seven patients -- 18 diabetics and 29 non-diabetics -- completed the study. There was a trend of lower total pain score (sum of the individual pain scores) on St. John's wort than on placebo (median 14 vs. 15, P=0.05). None of the individual pain ratings were significantly changed by St. John's wort as compared to placebo (P=0.09--0.33). Complete, good or moderate pain relief was experienced by nine patients with St. John's wort and two with placebo (P=0.07). In conclusion, St. John's wort has no significant effect on pain in polyneuropathy.