Trabeculectomy using mitomycin C versus an atelocollagen implant: clinical results of a randomized trial and histopathologic findings.

Category Primary study
JournalOphthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde
Year 2014

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference)

This article is part of the following matrixes of evidence:
Loading references information

PURPOSE:

To assess the efficacy of trabeculectomy with a biodegradable Ologen™ implant (OLO) versus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS:

In the MMC group (15 patients), trabeculectomy was performed according to standard protocols. In the OLO group (15 patients) after standard trabeculectomy, the implant was positioned on top of the scleral flap, and no MMC was applied.

RESULTS:

Mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) levels (

OLO:

28.0 ± 9.4;

MMC:

23.9 ± 5.0 mm Hg; p = 0.21) and medication score (

OLO:

3.4 ± 1.6;

MMC:

3.6 ± 1.5; p = 0.56) were comparable in both groups. One year after surgery, the mean IOP was 15.9 ± 4.5 mm Hg in the OLO group (p < 0.01, 43% reduction) and 11.0 ± 2.6 mm Hg in the MMC group (p < 0.01, 54% reduction). The surgical success rate 12 months after surgery was 93.3% in the MMC group and 40% in the OLO group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

With the atelocollagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix OLO it was not possible to reach the surgical success rate and pressure reduction achieved in the MMC group.
Epistemonikos ID: 760977c3d46462a580f8de4155aa3c4fbcbd21b9
First added on: Oct 24, 2016