BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis are usually hospitalized. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of elderly patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis who were treated at home versus traditional Hospitalization.
METHODS: Prospective study from March 2011 to September 2012 including patients over 70 years with uncomplicated diverticulitis admitted to Hospital at Home Unit and to Conventional Hospitalization from the Emergency Department. Patients with β-lactam allergy or who required admission to Conventional Hospitalization for other pathology were excluded. All patients were given intravenous antibiotic. Patients transferred to Hospital at Home stayed 24h in the Observation Ward within the Emergency Department prior to discharge. Characteristics and outcomes of patients are analyzed.
RESULTS: 34 patients were treated at home and 18 in hospital. Mean age was similar in both groups (77 vs 79). The oldest patient treated at home was 90 years old. 64% of patients treated in Hospital at Home had comorbidity vs 68% in Conventional Hospitalization. 11% of patients treated at home were diabetic. Thickening colonic wall was present in 100% of patients. 38% of patients treated at home had free fluid vs 42% treated in Hospital. All patients had a good clinical evolution. None of the patients treated at home was transferred to Hospital. Home treatment was associated with a cost reduction of 1368 euros per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at home of elderly patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis is as safe and effective as treatment in Hospital, even if patient has comorbidity.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, treatment of acute diverticulitis has mostly been based on inpatient care. The question arises whether these patients can be treated on an outpatient basis as the admissions for diverticular disease have been shown to be increasing every year. We studied whether outpatient treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is feasible and safe, and which patients could benefit from outpatient care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in two teaching hospitals using hospital registry codes for diverticulitis. All patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis between January 2004 and January 2012, confirmed by imaging or colonoscopy, were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with recurrent diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages 2, 3, and 4), and right-sided diverticulitis. Inpatient care was compared with outpatient care. Primary outcome was admission for outpatient care and the complication rate in both groups. Multivariate analysis was carried out to identify potential factors for inpatient care.
RESULTS: Of 627 patients with diverticulitis, a total of 312 consecutive patients were identified with primary uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon; 194 patients had been treated as inpatients and 118 patients primarily as outpatients. In this last group, 91.5% had been treated successfully without diverticulitis-related complications or the need for hospital admission during a mean follow-up period of 48 months.
CONCLUSION: Despite inherent patient selection in a retrospective cohort, ambulatory treatment of patients presenting with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis seems feasible and safe. In mildly ill and younger patients, hospital admission can be avoided.
BACKGROUND: In most cases of diverticulitis, inflammation is mild, and the only treatment required is a clear liquid diet and antibiotics. Until recently, patients were given this treatment as inpatients with the consequent expenditure of resources. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an outpatient treatment protocol with oral antibiotics in selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis in comparison with inpatient intravenous treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective non-randomized study between January 2007 and December 2009. We included all patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, at the Emergency Department of the University General Hospital of Elche. We compared the efficacy, safety and costs of hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics and outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics. Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Forty-four of them underwent intravenous treatment with Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h + Ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h (hospital treatment group) and 32 took oral antibiotics Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and Ciprofloxacin 500 mg/12 h (outpatient group).
RESULTS: Outpatient treatment is viable in almost 95 % of those patients suffering from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Treatment was effective in resolving inflammation, and there were no complications in the majority of cases (94 %). Only 2 patients (6 %) required admission after outpatient treatment. The results further reflect complications and relapse rates similar to those of patients admitted to hospital and treated with intravenous antibiotics. There are no significant statistical differences (p = 0.86) between inpatients and outpatients. It is possible to save approximately 1,600 € per patient with outpatient treatment (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment has demonstrated a safety and efficiency similar to inpatient treatment, producing an important reduction in expenses and medical resources.
AIM: Evidence supporting outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis is limited. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an ambulatory treatment protocol in patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.
METHOD: All patients diagnosed with uncomplicated diverticulitis based on abdominal computed tomography findings from June 2003 to December 2008 were considered for outpatient treatment. Admission was indicated in patients not able to tolerate oral intake and those with comorbidity or without adequate family support. Treatment consisted of oral antibiotics for 7 days (amoxicillin-clavulanic or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole in patients with penicillin allergy). Patients were seen again at between 4 and 7 days after starting treatment to confirm symptom improvement.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis and 26 presented at least one criterion for admission. Ambulatory treatment was initiated in 70 (73%) patients. Only two (3%) required admission because of persisting abdominal pain and vomiting, respectively. Intravenous antibiotics resolved the inflammatory process in both cases. In the remaining 68 (97%), ambulatory treatment was completed without complication.
CONCLUSION: Ambulatory treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis is safe, effective and applicable to most patients with tolerance to oral intake and without severe comorbidity and having appropriate family support.
BACKGROUND: Patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis and comorbidity are usually hospitalized. We analyze the efficacy and safety of treating these patients in Hospital at Home.
METHODS: Prospective study since January 2007 to December 2009. Patients were transferred to the Hospital at Home after 12-24h at Emergency Department Observation Ward. All patients were treated with intravenous antibiotic until clinical condition improved.
RESULTS: 176 patients were diagnosed with uncomplicated diverticulitis at the Emergency Department. 18% of them (33) had comorbidity. Twenty four patients were transferred to the Hospital at Home (seventeen patients had cardiopathy, four diabetes mellitus and three chronic renal failure). Mean age was 73.4 years. All patients had abdominal pain and 29.1% fever; 45.8% presented with leucocytosis. 20.8% had a previous history of diverticulitis. Mean stay of patients was 9 days. All patients had a favorable course. The home treatment was successfully completed in 100% of patients. 95% of the patients expressed their satisfaction with this type of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis and comorbidity at home after a short period of observation in Hospital is safe and effective.
PURPOSE: Many patients with acute diverticulitis can be managed as outpatients, but the success rate of this approach has not been thoroughly studied. We analyzed a large cohort of patients treated on an outpatient basis for an initial episode of acute diverticulitis to test our hypothesis that outpatient treatment of acute diverticulitis is highly effective.
METHODS: We analyzed patients within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system (from 2006 to 2007) who were diagnosed with an initial episode of diverticulitis during an emergency room visit and subsequently discharged home. Each patient underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan for diagnosis or for confirmation of a diagnosis, and each radiologic report was evaluated regarding the presence of free fluid, phlegmon, perforation, and abscess. Treatment failure was defined as a return to the emergency room or an admission for diverticulitis within 60 days of the initial evaluation.
RESULTS: Our study included 693 patients, of whom 54% were women, the average age was 58.5 years, and 6% failed treatment. In multivariate analysis, women (odds ratio, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.31-7.28]) and patients with free fluid on CT scan (odds ratio, 3.19 [95% CI, 1.45-7.05]) were at significantly higher risk for treatment failure. Age, white blood cell count, Charlson score, and duration of antibiotics were not significant predictive factors.
CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis, among a cohort of patients who were referred for outpatient treatment, we found that such treatment was effective for the vast majority (94%) of patients. Women and those with free fluid on CT scan appear to be at higher risk for treatment failure.
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute diverticulitis is currently being modified, showing a tendency to limit surgical treatment and favor conservative management.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficiency of ambulatory treatment of acute diverticulitis in a selected group of patients.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of domiciliary oral antibiotic therapy for acute diverticulitis in a cohort of patients in the Emergency Surgery Section of our hospital. Seventy-four patients (44 men and 30 women) were included between 2000 and 2006. Patients with Hinchey stage 1 diverticulitis and those with Hinchey stage 2 diverticulitis and abscesses of less than 3cm, who were clinically and biochemically stable, were selected. The patients were treated with oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole for 7-10 days. Follow-up was performed in the outpatients unit with clinical evaluation at 10 days and an imaging test at 1 month.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55 years. The most frequent clinical presentation was spontaneous abdominal pain associated with leukocytosis. The mean duration of treatment was 8.8 days. Four patients (5.4%) required subsequent hospital admission for intravenous antibiotic administration and 70 (94.6%) completed treatment without complications. During follow-up, two cases of colonic adenocarcinoma and six cases of polyposis were diagnosed. Only 13 patients underwent elective surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In most of the patients studied, ambulatory conservative management was safe and effective in the treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Moreover, this approach reduces length of hospital stay and lowers costs.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability, safety and efficacy of an ambulatory treatment protocol in patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis based on abdominal computed tomography findings during a 2-year period were prospectively included. Patients with vomiting, severe comorbidities, or without an appropriate family environment were excluded. Ambulatory treatment consisted of oral antibiotics for 1 week (amoxicillin-clavulanic 1 g t.i.d. or ciprofloxacin 500 mg b.i.d. plus metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. in patients with penicillin allergy). A clear liquid diet for the first 2 days and pain control with oral acetaminophen 1 g t.i.d. were also recommended.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis and 13 patients were excluded. Therefore, ambulatory treatment was initiated in 40 patients. Only two patients (5%) required admission after outpatient therapy was started due to vomiting and persistent abdominal pain, respectively. In both patients, the inflammatory process was successfully resolved by intravenous antibiotic treatment. In the remaining 38 patients (95%), ambulatory treatment was completed without complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis is safe, effective and applicable in most patients with tolerance to oral intake and with an appropriate family environment.
BACKGROUND: There are no management criteria for optimum out-patient care in mild-to-moderate acute colonic diverticulitis.
AIM: To enable such patients to be managed in an out-patient setting, by establishing criteria and treatment protocols.
METHODS: We conducted an open trial and follow-up study from 1997 to 2002. On the basis of ultrasonography, we defined and categorized mild-to-moderate acute colonic diverticulitis ranging from limited inflammation within diverticulum to an abscess < 2 cm in diameter. Subjects were treated as out-patients and followed a 10-day treatment protocol consisting of an oral antibiotic and a sports drink for the first 3 days. Physical examination and laboratory testing helped determine whether or not a patient could resume a liquid diet on day 4, and a regular diet on day 7.
RESULTS: Of the 70 patients, 68 were successfully treated. Two patients required hospitalization. Of the 65 patients who were tracked over several months [median (intraquarter range) = 30.8 (11.9-44.2) months], 16 had one or more clinical recurrences. The medical cost per episode was 80% lower than in-patient treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild-to-moderate acute colonic diverticulitis can be safely and successfully treated as out-patients using this protocol.
We compare the results of 2 different strategies for the management of patients with uncomplicated left colonic diverticulitis and to analyze differences in quality of life and economic costs.
BACKGROUND:
The most frequent standard management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis still is hospital admission both in Europe and United States.
METHODS:
This multicenter, randomized controlled trial included patients older than 18 years with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. All the patients underwent abdominal computed tomography. There were 2 strategies of management: hospitalization (group 1) and outpatient (group 2). The first dose of antibiotic was given intravenously to all patients in the emergency department and then group 1 patients were hospitalized whereas patients in group 2 were discharged. The primary end point was the treatment failure rate of the outpatient protocol and need for hospital admission. The secondary end points included quality-of-life assessment and evaluation of costs.
RESULTS:
A total of 132 patients were randomized: 4 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 presented treatment failure without differences between the groups (P = 0.619). The overall health care cost per episode was 3 times lower in group 2, with savings of &OV0556;1124.70 per patient. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of quality of life.
