BACKGROUND: Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium is a relatively new therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a large primary care medical center to determine the impact of hyaluronate sodium vs conventional therapy on measures of pain, stiffness, and disability at rest and following functionally relevant walking and stepping activities. METHODS: A total of 120 patients (mean age, 67 years) with unilateral grades 1 to 3 medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: group 1, 2 mL of hyaluronate sodium at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and placebo (100 mg of lactose); group 2, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (75 mg of diclofenac and 200 microg of misoprostol) and hyaluronate sodium; group 3, NSAIDs and placebo (2 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution [saline]); and group 4, placebo (lactose and saline). Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium or saline (2 mL) was administered once weekly over 3 weeks while NSAIDs or lactose were administered twice daily over 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) global measure of pain, stiffness, and disability; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and following functional walking and stepping activities (self-paced walking and stepping); and (3) functional performance (exercise time, heart rate, and predicted maximum oxygen uptake) at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: At week 4, significant improvement in WOMAC scores for pain and disability and VAS score for resting pain was observed in groups 1 to 3 compared with baseline measures. Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower self-paced stepping pain, while no change was observed in group 4. At week 12, groups 1 to 3 showed significantly greater improvement in WOMAC pain subscale score and VAS score for resting pain; however, these differences did not vary from week 4. Following self-paced walking and stepping, groups 1 and 2 reported significantly less activity pain, while group 1 showed significantly faster self-paced walking and stepping test results. Groups 1 to 3 improved self-paced walking and stepping time at week 12 compared with baseline measures, while predicted maximum oxygen uptake was significantly higher in the hyaluronate sodium groups 1 and 2 at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline measures. CONCLUSIONS: For resting pain relief, hyaluronate sodium seems to be as effective as NSAIDs. Further, for pain with physical activity and functional performance, hyaluronate sodium may be superior to placebo alone or NSAIDs alone.
OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of intraarticular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA; Hyalgan) versus placebo and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHOD: A series of 5 weekly IA injections of HA (20 mg each) was compared to placebo or oral naproxen in a 26 week, double blind, masked observer, multicenter trial of 495 patients with idiopathic OA. Acetaminophen was permitted for escape analgesia. The primary measurement was pain experienced on a 50 foot walk test for those completing the study (completers) as measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). Also measured were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index (pain, stiffness, function) and categorical assessments of pain. RESULTS: Patients receiving HA improved more with respect to pain on the 50 foot walk compared to placebo at Week 26 (HA vs placebo difference 8.8 mm; p < 0.005); 56% of HA treated patients compared to 41 % of placebo treated patients had > or = 20 mm reduction in the VAS from Week 5 continuously through Week 26 (p=0.031). At 26 weeks, more HA treated patients (47.6%) had slight pain or were pain-free in contrast to placebo treated (33.1%; p=0.039) or naproxen treated (36.9%; p=0.22) [corrected] patients. Improvement in secondary outcome variables was generally superior in the HA group compared to those receiving placebo and was significantly better at Week 26 with respect to the WOMAC pain (p=0.041) and WOMAC physical function (p=0.047) subscales. The HA group also tended to have better results relative to the naproxen group in both primary and secondary assessments. For all randomized patients, there was a > or = 20 mm improvement in pain experienced on the 50 foot walk in 28% [corrected] of placebo treated patients vs 36% [corrected] of the HA treated patients (p=0.127; 67% of patients completed the trial). Injection site pain, more commonly reported in the HA group (38/164=23%) than in the placebo group (22/168=13%; p < 0.001), resulted in withdrawal in 6 patients (4%). One withdrawal was associated with the HA injection (< 1%). Gastrointestinal adverse events were significantly more common in the naproxen group than the HA or the placebo groups and 14 naproxen treated patients (8.3%) discontinued prematurely due to these events. CONCLUSION: This large, controlled randomized clinical trial confirms that 5 weekly IA injections of HA (Hyalgan) in patients with OA of the knee are generally well tolerated, provide sustained relief of pain and improved patient function, and were at least as effective with fewer adverse reactions as continuous treatment with naproxen for 26 weeks.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: One hundred patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee entered a randomized blind-observer trial of 6 months HA vs placebo. Primary efficacy criteria were pain on walking, measured with a visual analogue scale, and the Lequesne Index. RESULTS: For pain on walking, a significant difference in favour of HA was found for completed patients at week 5, the end of the course of injections, and at month 6, the end of the study (P = 0.0087 and P = 0.0049, respectively). Further analysis using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) also showed a significant benefit favouring HA at month 6 (P = 0.0010). For the Lequesne Index, a significant difference in favour of HA was found at week 5 (P = 0.030) and at month 2 (P = 0.0431), but this was only of borderline significance at month 4 (P = 0.0528). Patients' global assessment of efficacy favoured HA at month 6 (P = 0.012). Improvement in other secondary criteria was generally superior in the HA group compared to placebo both at week 5 and month 6. Adverse events, mainly local injection site reactions, occurred in both groups with equal frequency. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that five weekly intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) were superior to placebo and well tolerated in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee with a symptomatic benefit which persisted for 6 months.
Hylan G-F 20, which is derived from hyaluronan, is a highly purified, elastoviscous fluid with rheologic properties similar to those of synovial fluid in the knee joints of healthy young persons. The efficacy and safety of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 were evaluated in a multicenter, double-masked clinical study in patients with chronic idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee of 1 to 30 years' duration. Three intra-articular injections of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 were administered 1 week apart to 57 knees. The control group (60 knees) received 2 mL of physiologic buffered saline solution at the same intervals. Patients were predominantly female (65%), with a mean age of 62 years and mean weight of 76 kg. Using a visual analogue scale, patients assessed the following clinical variables: pain during weight-bearing, pain at rest during the night, reduction of pain during the most painful movement of the knee, and treatment success. Evaluators also assessed patients' loss of activity while performing difficult daily tasks and treatment success. There was dramatic early improvement in all six variables with hylan G-F 20 beginning after the first injection; the improvement continued through the study end points. The differences between hylan G-F 20 and saline treatment were statistically significant for all outcome measures. In the hylan G-F 20 group, 39% to 56% of patients were free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain 10 to 24 weeks after the last injection. Treatment with saline was less effective, with fewer than 13% of patients free or nearly free of weight-bearing pain. Use of rescue therapy was significantly greater in the saline group than in the hylan G-F 20 group. No adverse events were observed in the injected joint after hylan G-F 20 treatment. These results demonstrate that hylan G-F 20 is effective and well tolerated in the management of chronic idiopathic OA.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intra-articular injections of hyaluronan on symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients with symptomatic, radiological knee OA were randomly assigned to treatment with weekly injections for five weeks with either 25 mg of high molecular weight hyaluronan or vehicle. Results were evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, and 20 by visual analogue scales (pain, function, motion, activity), algofunctional index, and global evaluation by patient and investigator. Analysis was by "intention to treat', "per protocol', and area under the curve principles on unstratified patient groups and for patients stratified into four groups of equal size by age and baseline algofunctional index. RESULTS: No serious side effects were reported. At 20 weeks both treatment groups were improved compared with baseline, with no difference between unstratified groups treated with placebo or hyaluronan. Comparison of treatment groups stratified by age and baseline algofunctional index revealed a significant difference in favour of hyaluronan over placebo (pain, activity, algofunctional index, global evaluations by patient and investigator) for patients older than 60 years and with a baseline algofunctional index greater than 10. There was no clinically relevant difference between the two treatments for the other three stratified subgroups of younger age or fewer symptoms. Similar results were obtained by area under the curve, intention to treat, and per protocol analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 60 years with knee osteoarthritis and with significant symptoms corresponding to an index of severity of knee disease of 10 or more, comprise the group most likely to benefit from treatment with intra-articular hyaluronan injections.
Double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies, which included 6-month follow-up, were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of hylan versus physiologic saline administered intra-articularly to the affected joint of 80 patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. During a 2-week preinjection washout period and for the duration of the studies, patients received no steroidal or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or analgesic medication. Two intra-articular injections administered 2 weeks apart were compared with three intra-articular injections given 1 week apart. Outcome measures included pain under weight-bearing movement, pain at night, reduction of activity while performing daily tasks, improvement of the most painful knee movement, and overall evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Most parameters were evaluated by both the patient and the investigator. Compared with the control group, the two-injection and three-injection hylan treatment groups both showed statistically significantly greater improvement for the pain outcome measures as well as overall evaluation of treatment at the 12-week evaluation. The three-injection group showed statistically significantly greater improvement for all outcome measures compared with the two-injection group at the 12-week evaluation. At the 6-month follow-up, results in both hylan treatment groups were significantly superior to those in the control group in terms of reducing weight-bearing pain and night pain and restoring joint function. No generalized adverse events were observed, and only one local, transient adverse event (muscle pain) was reported. The results suggest that hylan is an extremely effective and safe viscosupplementation therapy for the management of degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. Beneficial results can be maximized using a treatment schedule of three hylan injections administered at l-week intervals.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of intra-articular injections of hyaluronan in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial was carried out on 91 patients with radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis of the knee who were recruited from the outpatient clinics. RESULTS: It was found that weekly intraarticular injections of 20 mg of hyaluronan of M(r) = 750,000 (Hyalgan) in 2 ml of buffered saline performed no better than the inert vehicle alone over a five week period. The principal side effects of a transient increase in pain and swelling in the affected knee was observed in 47% of the treatment group compared with 22% of the placebo group. A few patients with radiologically mild disease treated with Hyalgan appeared to experience medium to long-term symptomatic improvement over matched placebo controls as judged by a delayed return to previous NSAID therapy or analgesia other than paracetamol. Patient numbers in the survival groups, however, were too small to be meaningful. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that intraarticular administration of this preparation of 750 kD hyaluronan offers no significant benefit over placebo during a five week treatment period, but incurs a significantly higher morbidity, and therefore has no place in the routine treatment of osteoarthritis.
The efficacy and the safety of intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate were studied in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in a randomized multicenter double-blind study. Two hundred and nine patients received five injections of either 25 mg hyaluronate/2.5 ml (verum, N = 102) or 0.25 mg hyaluronate/2.5 ml (control, N = 107) at weekly intervals. Seven patients in each group were excluded from the protocol-correct efficacy analysis. The Lequesne Index, the first main criterion, showed a significant superiority of the verum-treated patients after the third injection up to the final follow-up examination 9 weeks after the last injection (MANOVA, P < 0.025). The consumption of paracetamol was defined as a complementary main criterion that did not reveal significant differences between the treatment groups. Most of the individual secondary endpoints demonstrated a much better response to the active treatment without reaching the significance level in the intergroup comparisons for the single time-points. Side-effects were confined to local reactions of minor severity and short duration in four patients (six events) of the verum group and in five patients of the control group. Clinical chemistry and hematology remained essentially unchanged.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 34 patients suffering from osteo-arthritis of the knee. A total of 40 joints was treated at random with 3 intra-articular injections, at 1 week intervals, of either 20 mg sodium hyaluronate or placebo. Clinical examinations, including assessments of spontaneous pain intensity, pain on touch, under load and while walking, were made before each injection and repeated 7 days after the last one and again at 60 days after the start of the trial. The results showed a significant difference between treatments for all the variables assessed. In the sodium hyaluronate group, pain relief was not only rapid but also long lasting. Local tolerance was very good for both treatments.
Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium is a relatively new therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a large primary care medical center to determine the impact of hyaluronate sodium vs conventional therapy on measures of pain, stiffness, and disability at rest and following functionally relevant walking and stepping activities.
METHODS:
A total of 120 patients (mean age, 67 years) with unilateral grades 1 to 3 medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: group 1, 2 mL of hyaluronate sodium at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and placebo (100 mg of lactose); group 2, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (75 mg of diclofenac and 200 microg of misoprostol) and hyaluronate sodium; group 3, NSAIDs and placebo (2 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution [saline]); and group 4, placebo (lactose and saline). Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium or saline (2 mL) was administered once weekly over 3 weeks while NSAIDs or lactose were administered twice daily over 12 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
(1) Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) global measure of pain, stiffness, and disability; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and following functional walking and stepping activities (self-paced walking and stepping); and (3) functional performance (exercise time, heart rate, and predicted maximum oxygen uptake) at baseline and weeks 4 and 12.
RESULTS:
At week 4, significant improvement in WOMAC scores for pain and disability and VAS score for resting pain was observed in groups 1 to 3 compared with baseline measures. Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower self-paced stepping pain, while no change was observed in group 4. At week 12, groups 1 to 3 showed significantly greater improvement in WOMAC pain subscale score and VAS score for resting pain; however, these differences did not vary from week 4. Following self-paced walking and stepping, groups 1 and 2 reported significantly less activity pain, while group 1 showed significantly faster self-paced walking and stepping test results. Groups 1 to 3 improved self-paced walking and stepping time at week 12 compared with baseline measures, while predicted maximum oxygen uptake was significantly higher in the hyaluronate sodium groups 1 and 2 at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline measures.
CONCLUSIONS:
For resting pain relief, hyaluronate sodium seems to be as effective as NSAIDs. Further, for pain with physical activity and functional performance, hyaluronate sodium may be superior to placebo alone or NSAIDs alone.
