Patent foramen ovale closure for patients with cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and comprehensive meta‐analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies.

BACKGROUND:

Previous review from randomized controlled trials (RCT) showed that patients with cryptogenic stroke may benefit from patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. However, the findings from the systematic review were not clear when observational studies were also included.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints were recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcomes were all‐cause death, atrial fibrillation (AF), and hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS:

Five randomized trials and fourteen observational studies (6301 participants) were eligible. PFO closure was superior to medical therapy for stroke prevention risk ratios ([RR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24‐0.60), but showed increased risk of AF (RR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.31‐10.7). There was no significant difference in TIA recurrence, death, and hemorrhagic events. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with factors such as substantial residual shunt, the presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), male, and age < 45 years had a lower risk of recurrent stroke when PFOs were closed.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure does appeared to be superior to medical therapy in stroke prevention, with an increased incidence of AF. Male, age < 45 years, substantial residual shunt, and the history of ASA are the factors that will predict the benefit when PFO is closed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)