BACKGROUND: The extent of facial nerve damage is expected to be more severe in higher grades of facial palsy, and the outcome after applying different treatment methods may reveal obvious differences between severe Bell's palsy and mild to moderate palsy. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of different treatment methods and related prognostic factors in severe to complete Bell's palsy.
METHODS: This randomized, prospective study was performed in patients with severe to complete Bell's palsy. Patients were assigned randomly to treatment with a steroid or a combination of a steroid and an antiviral agent. We collected data about recovery and other prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The steroid treatment group (S group) comprised 107 patients, and the combination treatment group (S+A group) comprised 99 patients. There were no significant intergroup differences in age, sex, accompanying disease, period from onset to treatment, or results of an electrophysiology test (P >.05). There was a significant difference in complete recovery between the 2 groups. The recovery (grades I and II) of the S group was 66.4% and that of the S+A group was 82.8% (P=.010). The S+A group showed a 2.6-times higher possibility of complete recovery than the S group, and patients with favorable electromyography showed a 2.2-times higher possibility of complete recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with a steroid and an antiviral agent is more effective in treating severe to complete Bell's palsy than steroid treatment alone.
INTRODUCTION: Bell's palsy is a common condition. Incomplete recovery occurs in 15% of cases. In recent years evidence of a possible role of herpes simplex virus type 1 in its etiology has accumulated. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of valacyclovir and prednisone versus prednisone placebo in Bell's palsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized and placebo controlled study. Of 41 patients enrolled, 21 were treated with 2 g valacyclovir qd for seven days and prednisone (PV) and 19 with prednisone plus placebo (PP) administered orally.
Clinical controls were carried out at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, patients with incomplete recovery were followed for six months. Recovery was defined as satisfactory with a score higher than 90 on a composite score of facial paralysis (FGS). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in the score of facial paralysis. Recovery at six months was 86.4% in the PV group and 89.5% in the PP group (p = 0.86). The average recovery was 70.2 and 71.1 days, respectively (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not show an additional benefit of valacyclovir in the treatment of Bell's palsy.
According to current evidence, there is no consensus regarding the routine use of antivirals in all cases of Bell's palsy
BACKGROUND: Previous trials of corticosteroid or antiviral treatments for Bell's palsy have been underpowered or have had insufficient follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term effects of prednisolone and valaciclovir in the recovery of the affected facial nerve in a large number of patients. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, patients aged 18 to 75 years who sought care directly or were referred from emergency departments or general practitioners within 72 h of onset of acute, unilateral, peripheral facial palsy, between May, 2001, and September, 2006, were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of eight to receive placebo plus placebo; 60 mg prednisolone per day for 5 days then reduced by 10 mg per day (for a total treatment time of 10 days) plus placebo; 1000mg valaciclovir three times per day for 7 days plus placebo; or prednisolone (10 days) plus valaciclovir (7 days). Follow-up was for 12 months. The primary outcome event was time to complete recovery of facial function, as assessed with a regional Sunnybrook scale score of 100 points. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00S10263. FINDINGS: Of 839 patients who were randomly assigned, 829 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 206 received placebo plus placebo, 210 prednisolone plus placebo, 207valaciclovir plus placebo, and 206 prednisolone plus valaciclovir. Time to recovery was significantly shorter in the 416 patients who received prednisolone compared with the 413 patients who did not (hazard ratio 1-40, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.64; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in time to recovery between the 413 patients treated with valaciclovir and the 416 patients who did not receive valaciclovir (1.01, 0.85 to 1.19; p = 0.90). The number of patients with adverse events was similar in all treatment arms. INTERPRETATION: Prednisolone shortened the time to complete recovery in patients with Bell's palsy, where as valaciclovir did not affect facial recovery. Funding: Uppsala University; GlaxoSmithKline (Sweden); Pfizer AB (Sweden); Acta Otolaryngologica Foundation; Rosa and Emanuel Nachmanssons Foundation; Stig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation; Torsten Birger Segerfalk Foundation; Margit Arstrups Foundation; County Council of Skåne; Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
PURPOSE: The pathogenetic mechanism of Bell's palsy is thought to involve herpes simplex virus reactivation within the geniculate ganglion, followed by inflammation and entrapment of the nerve at the meatal foramen. We therefore compared the therapeutic effect of acyclovir plus steroid vs steroid alone, in combination with physical therapy, in patients with Bell's palsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, prospective trial, 91 patients were randomized to treatment with acyclovir and prednisone (44 patients) or prednisone alone (47 patients). All patients underwent physical therapy. The follow-up period was greater than 6 months or encompassed the period of complete recovery from paralysis. House-Brackmann grade was evaluated 2 and 6 months after onset, with complete and satisfactory recovery defined as House-Brackmann grades I and II, respectively.
RESULTS: The overall recovery rate of patients treated with steroid and acyclovir (93.1%) was greater than that of patients treated with steroid alone (85.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The benefit of acyclovir in Bell's palsy has not been definitively established.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 or varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is the main cause of Bell's palsy and whether antiviral drugs bring about recovery from Bell's palsy.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, controlled study.
METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with Bell's palsy were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to a prednisolone group or a prednisolone-valacyclovir group, in whom virologic examinations for HSV-1 and VZV were performed by simple randomization scheme in sealed envelopes. The recovery rates among various groups were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Reactivation of HSV-1, VZV, and both viruses was detected in 15.3%, 14.7%, and 4.0% of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in recovery rates between the prednisolone group and the prednisolone-valacyclovir group, although recovery in the patients with HSV-1 reactivation tended to be higher in the prednisolone-valacyclovir group than in the prednisolone group. There was a significant difference in recovery among age groups and between individuals with complete and incomplete paralysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Reactivation of HSV-1 or VZV was observed in 34% of the patients with Bell's palsy. The effect of combination therapy with prednisolone and valacyclovir on recovery was not significantly higher than that with prednisolone alone.
Journal»Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of valacyclovir and prednisolone in comparison with those of placebo and prednisolone for the treatment of Bell's palsy, excluding zoster sine herpete.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: Six academic tertiary referral centers.
PATIENTS: Ultimately, 221 patients with Bell's palsy who were treated within 7 days of the onset. Serological and polymerase chain reaction examinations were performed to distinguish Bell's palsy from zoster sine herpete.
INTERVENTION: The patients were treated with either valacyclovir (dosage, 1,000 mg/d for 5 days) plus prednisolone (VP [n = 114]) or placebo plus prednisolone (PP [n = 107]) administered orally.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Recovery from the palsy was defined as a score higher than 36 using Yanagihara 40-point scoring system without facial contracture or synkinesis. The patients were followed up until complete recovery occurred or for more than 6 months in cases with a poor prognosis.
RESULTS: The overall rate of patient recovery among those treated with VP (96.5%) was significantly better (p < 0.05) than the rate among those treated with PP (89.7%). The rate of patient recovery was also analyzed by classifying the initial severity of facial palsy. In cases of complete or severe palsy, the rates of patients treated with VP and PP who recovered were 95.7% (n = 92) and 86.6% (n = 82), respectively; the recovery rate for treatment with VP was significantly better than that with PP (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The valacyclovir and prednisolone therapy was more effective in treating Bell's palsy, excluding zoster sine herpete, than the conventional prednisolone therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled study of an antiviral agent in the treatment of a sufficient number of Bell's palsy cases based on an etiologic background.
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids and antiviral agents are widely used to treat the early stages of idiopathic facial paralysis (i.e., Bell's palsy), but their effectiveness is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, factorial trial involving patients with Bell's palsy who were recruited within 72 hours after the onset of symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with prednisolone, acyclovir, both agents, or placebo. The primary outcome was recovery of facial function, as rated on the House-Brackmann scale. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, appearance, and pain. RESULTS: Final outcomes were assessed for 496 of 551 patients who underwent randomization. At 3 months, the proportions of patients who had recovered facial function were 83.0% in the prednisolone group as compared with 63.6% among patients who did not receive prednisolone (P<0.001) and 71.2% in the acyclovir group as compared with 75.7% among patients who did not receive acyclovir (adjusted P=0.50). After 9 months, these proportions were 94.4% for prednisolone and 81.6% for no prednisolone (P<0.001) and 85.4% for acyclovir and 90.8% for no acyclovir (adjusted P=0.10). For patients treated with both drugs, the proportions were 79.7% at 3 months (P<0.001) and 92.7% at 9 months (P<0.001). There were no clinically significant differences between the treatment groups in secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events in any group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Bell's palsy, early treatment with prednisolone significantly improves the chances of complete recovery at 3 and 9 months. There is no evidence of a benefit of acyclovir given alone or an additional benefit of acyclovir in combination with prednisolone. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN71548196 [controlled-trials.com].).
In a prospective, controlled, and randomized study, we compared the outcome of 101 Bell's palsy patients treated with acyclovir (54 patients) or prednisone (47 patients). The acyclovir dosage was 2400 mg (800 mg three times a day) for 10 days, and prednisone was given as a single daily dose of 1 mg/kg of body weight for 10 days and tapered to 0 over the next 6 days. Minimum follow-up was 3 months in all patients. Patients in the prednisone group had better clinical recovery than those treated with acyclovir. Less degree of neural degeneration was observed in the prednisone group compared with acyclovir patients. The incidence of sequelae was the same in both groups. According to these results, in a 10-day treatment cycle acyclovir given 800 mg three times is not as useful as prednisone given 1 mg/kg of body weight once a day in patients with idiopathic facial nerve paralysis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of treatment with combination of prednisone plus acyclovir versus prednisone alone in time to recovery and outcome in Bell's palsy. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1996 we carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on 46 patients with Bell's palsy that developed less than 4 days before study enrolment. Acyclovir or a matched placebo was administered orally, 800mg five times daily for 7 days. Prednisone was administered to both groups of patients orally at 60 mg/d for the first 5 days, 50mg, 40mg, 30mg, 20mg, 10mg, daily for other 5 days. Bell's palsy was graded by House-Brackmann facial nerve dysfunction grading system. Facial nerve function evaluation was done monthly for 6 months. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar for each group. Patients receiving acyclovir plus prednisone had accelerated time to recovery of Bell's palsy, and significantly improved outcome compared with patients receiving prednisone alone (t=4.15, p<0.05, x2=B.54, p<0.01 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Bell's palsy combined acyclovir and prednisone therapy can shorten time to recovery, and improve outcome.
In a double-blind study, we compared the final outcome of 99 Bell's palsy patients treated with either acyclovir-prednisone (53 patients) or placebo-prednisone (46 patients). For patients receiving acyclovir, the dosage was 2,000 mg (400 mg 5 times daily) for 10 days. Electrical tests included electroneurography and the maximal stimulation test. Univariate comparisons of outcome and electrical tests between the two groups were made with chi 2 analysis, Fisher's exact test, and t-tests. The outcome in acyclovir-prednisone-treated patients was superior to that in placebo-prednisone-treated patients. Treatment with acyclovir-prednisone was statistically more effective in returning volitional muscle motion (recovery profile of 10; p = .02) and in preventing partial nerve degeneration (p = .05) than placebo-prednisone treatment. The t-tests indicated that the recovery profile and index means were significantly better for the acyclovir-treated group (recovery profile t = 1.99, p = .051; recovery index t = 2.10, p = .040). We conclude that acyclovir-prednisone is superior to prednisone alone in treating Bell's palsy patients and suggest that herpes simplex is the probable cause of Bell's palsy.
The extent of facial nerve damage is expected to be more severe in higher grades of facial palsy, and the outcome after applying different treatment methods may reveal obvious differences between severe Bell's palsy and mild to moderate palsy. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of different treatment methods and related prognostic factors in severe to complete Bell's palsy.
METHODS:
This randomized, prospective study was performed in patients with severe to complete Bell's palsy. Patients were assigned randomly to treatment with a steroid or a combination of a steroid and an antiviral agent. We collected data about recovery and other prognostic factors.
RESULTS:
The steroid treatment group (S group) comprised 107 patients, and the combination treatment group (S+A group) comprised 99 patients. There were no significant intergroup differences in age, sex, accompanying disease, period from onset to treatment, or results of an electrophysiology test (P >.05). There was a significant difference in complete recovery between the 2 groups. The recovery (grades I and II) of the S group was 66.4% and that of the S+A group was 82.8% (P=.010). The S+A group showed a 2.6-times higher possibility of complete recovery than the S group, and patients with favorable electromyography showed a 2.2-times higher possibility of complete recovery.
CONCLUSIONS:
Combined treatment with a steroid and an antiviral agent is more effective in treating severe to complete Bell's palsy than steroid treatment alone.
