Primary studies related to this topic

loading
10 References (10 articles) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

The efficacy and safety of intravenous glucocorticoids in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

blocked
Authors An N , Liu K , Fan BY , Ma DH
Journal International journal of surgery (London, England)
Year 2018
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 6 Primary studies 6 Primary studies (6 references)

Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the effect and safety of intravenous glucocorticoids for reducing pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and total morphine consumption for patients prepared for total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Electronic databases: PubMed (1950-September 2016), EMBASE(1974-September 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, September 2016 Issue 3) and Web of Science (1950-September 2016) were systematically searched. RCTs compared intravenous glucocorticoids versus placebo for patients prepared for THA were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) at post anesthesia care unit (PACU), at 24 h and 48 h and the occurrence of PONV. The secondary outcomes was total morphine consumption. We calculated risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% CI for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Five clinical trials involving 255 patients were included for this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that intravenous steroids can decrease VAS at PACU (WMD = -10.40, 95% CI -14.18 to -6.62, P < 0.00001; I2 = 0.0%) and total morphine consumption (WMD = -19.71, 95% CI -32.66 to -6.76, P = 0.003; I2 = 57.4%). No significant difference was observed in the VAS at 24 h and 48 h between the intravenous glucocorticoids and placebo groups. Intravenous steroids can decrease the occurrence of PONV (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.93, P = 0.029; I2 = 41.2%). The occurrence of PONV tended to decrease as the glucocorticoids dose increased. CONCLUSION: Intravenous glucocorticoids can decrease early pain intensity and PONV after THA. The number of the included studies and the dose of glucocorticoids is different, thus, more high quality RCTs are still needed to identify the optimal drug and the safety of intravenous glucocorticoids.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Effect of methylprednisolone on pain management in total knee or hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

blocked
Authors Liu G , Gong M , Wang Y , Xiang Z
Journal The Clinical journal of pain
Year 2018
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 6 Primary studies 6 Primary studies (6 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been reported to be a successful strategy for patients with advanced osteoarthritis; however, early postoperative pain has become an unresolved issue. Perioperative methylprednisolone (MP) administration in TJA is an important and controversial topic. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of MP for pain management after total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing MP versus placebo for patients undergoing TKA/THA. Related indicators that reflected the efficacy and safety for pain management were evaluated by meta-analysis. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials involving a total of 350 patients met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes showed that intravenous MP significantly reduced pain scores at 6 and 24 hours during activity after TKA and THA but local use of MP had no clear benefit in reducing pain scores compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in VAS at 24 hours at rest and 48 hours during activity after TKA and THA. In addition, MP was associated with a reduction of morphine consumption at 24 hours after TKA. Furthermore, patients receiving MP had an obvious inflammatory control and improving postoperative nausea and vomiting and the use of MP was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of complications. There was no significant difference in the range of knee motion and length of hospital stay in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that intravenous MP significantly alleviated early postoperative pain and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after TKA and THA. For safety, intravenous MP as a promising strategy in rapid recovery to TJA. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Systematic review

Unclassified

Preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids can decrease acute pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting after total hip arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

blocked
Authors Yang Q. , Zhang Z. , Xin W. , Li A.
Journal Medicine (United States)
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

This article includes 11 Primary studies 11 Primary studies (11 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids versus controls for the prevention of postoperative acute pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A computer literature search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Wanfang database, was conducted to identify the relevant RCTs comparing preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids versus placebos for reducing acute pain and PONV in THA patients. The primary outcomes included the use of the visual analog scale (VAS) with rest or mobilization at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours and the occurrence of PONV. The secondary outcome was total morphine consumption. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% CI for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Pooled data from 7 RCTs (411 THAs) favored preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids against acute pain intensity at 4, 24, and 48 hours (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the VAS with rest or mobilization at 72 hours (P > .05). Subsequently, preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids provided a total morphine-sparing effect of 9.36 mg (WMD = -9.36, 95% CI = -12.33 to -6.38, P = .000). In addition, preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids were associated with a significant reduction of the occurrence of PONV (RR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.30-0.57, P = .000). CONCLUSION: Intravenous glucocorticoids can decrease early pain intensity and PONV after THA. However, the low number of studies and variation in dosing regimens limits the evidence for its use. Thus, more high-quality RCTs are still needed to identify the optimal drug and the safety of intravenous glucocorticoids.

Systematic review

Unclassified

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous glucocorticoids for acute pain following total hip arthroplasty.

blocked
Authors Li X , Sun Z , Han C , He L , Wang B
Journal Medicine
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

This article includes 6 Primary studies 6 Primary studies (6 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are increasingly used perioperatively, principally to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and acute postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The authors hypothesized that preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids is associated with less pain scores and PONV without increasing the complications after THA. METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) were searched with the limitations of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search cutoff date was set at November 6, 2016. Participants were patients who were prepared for primary THA. Intervention was preoperative intravenous glucocorticoids for postoperative pain control. Outcomes including the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 24 and 48 hours post operation, the occurrence of PONV and total morphine consumption were recorded. We calculated risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% CI for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies were evaluated, which included 297 patients who underwent hip surgery with intravenous glucocorticoid treatment and control patients who underwent hip surgery without glucocorticoid treatment. Pooled results indicated that intravenous glucocorticoid treatment was associated with a reduction of VAS scores at the PACU (WMD = -9.06, 95% CI -12.67 to -5.45, P = .000) and total morphine consumption by 15.68 mg (WMD = -15.68, 95% CI -24.60 to -6.75, P = .001). No significant difference was observed in the VAS scores at 24 and 48 hours between the intravenous glucocorticoid and placebo treatments. Intravenous steroids can decrease the occurrence of PONV (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.82, P = .029). CONCLUSION: Intravenous glucocorticoid treatment can decrease early pain intensity and PONV after THA. However, the evidence for the use of glucocorticoids is limited by the low number of studies and variation in dosing regimens. Thus, additional high-quality RCTs are needed to identify the optimal drug protocol and determine the safety of intravenous glucocorticoids.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Perioperative systemic glucocorticoids in total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of outcomes

blocked
Journal Journal of orthopaedics
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

This article includes 6 Primary studies 6 Primary studies (6 references)

Loading references information
Background Perioperative systemic glucocorticoids are frequently included in multimodal analgesia and antiemetic regimens administered to patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of perioperative systemic glucocorticoids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain, narcotic consumption, antiemetic consumption, length of stay in hospital, and major complications in patients undergoing elective THA or TKA. Methods A predefined protocol of eligibility and methodology was used for conduct of systematic reviews. Two reviewers screened citations for inclusion, assessed methodological quality, and verified the extracted data. Results Six RCTs were included for analysis. Across all outcomes analyzed, patients who received glucocorticoids experienced either a benefit or no difference compared to those patients who did not receive glucocorticoids. There were no instances in which perioperative glucocorticoids had a negative impact on any of the outcomes that were analyzed. Furthermore, perioperative glucocorticoids had no effect on the rates of superficial infection, deep infection, wound complications or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Conclusion The results of this systematic review support the use of perioperative systemic glucocorticoids in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty. Perioperative glucocorticoids have overall positive outcomes with the benefits being more robust in those patients undergoing TKA compared to THA. Glucocorticoids did not increase the occurrence of major complications. There is limited data to support the conclusion that they can reduce length of stay in hospital.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Perioperative systemic steroid for rapid recovery in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

blocked
Authors Yue C , Wei R , Liu Y
Journal Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

This article includes 11 Primary studies 11 Primary studies (11 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Perioperative systemic steroid administration for rapid recovery in total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) is an important and controversial topic. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the overall benefits and harms of perioperative systemic steroid in patients undergoing TKA and THA. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science databases, and a systematic approach was carried out starting from the PRISMA recommendations. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version. Data were extracted and meta-analyzed or qualitatively synthesized for all the outcomes. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 11 trials involving 774 procedures. Meta-analysis showed that high-dose systemic steroid (dexamethasone > 0.1 mg/kg) rather than low dose is effective to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative acute pain (within 24 h). In addition, systemic steroid is associated within faster functional rehabilitation and greater inflammation control. On the other hand, systemic steroid is associated with a higher level of postoperative serum glucose on the operation day. The complications between groups are similarly low. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that by providing lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and less postoperative acute pain, high-dose systemic steroid plays a critical role in rapid recovery to TKA and THA. The preliminary results also show the superior possibility of systemic steroid in functional rehabilitation and inflammation control. More large, high-quality studies that investigate the safety and dose-response relationship are necessary.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Safety of Perioperative Glucocorticoids in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

blocked
Journal Anesthesiology
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 56 Primary studies 56 Primary studies (56 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are increasingly used perioperatively, principally to prevent nausea and vomiting. Safety concerns focus on the potential for hyperglycemia and increased infection. The authors hypothesized that glucocorticoids predispose to such adverse outcomes in a dose-dependent fashion after elective noncardiac surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic literature search of the major medical databases from their inception to April 2016. Randomized glucocorticoid trials in adults specifically reporting on a safety outcome were included and meta-analyzed with Peto odds ratio method or the quality effects model. Subanalyses were performed according to a dexamethasone dose equivalent of low (less than 8 mg), medium (8 to 16 mg), and high (more than 16 mg). The primary endpoints of any wound infection and peak perioperative glucose concentrations were subject to meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifty-six trials from 18 countries were identified, predominantly assessing dexamethasone. Glucocorticoids did not impact on any wound infection (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2) but did result in a clinically unimportant increase in peak perioperative glucose concentration (weighted mean difference, 20.0 mg/dl; CI, 11.4 to 28.6; P < 0.001 or 1.1 mM; CI, 0.6 to 1.6). Glucocorticoids reduced peak postoperative C-reactive protein concentrations (weighted mean difference, -22.1 mg/l; CI, -31.7 to -12.5; P < 0.001), but other adverse outcomes and length of stay were unchanged. No dose-effect relationships were apparent. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence at present does not highlight any safety concerns with respect to the use of perioperative glucocorticoids and subsequent infection, hyperglycemia, or other adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, collated trials lacked sufficient surveillance and power to detect clinically important differences in complications such as wound infection.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Postoperative pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review

Journal Pain
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 58 Primary studies 58 Primary studies (58 references)

Loading references information
Treatment of postoperative pain should rely on results from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of high scientific quality. The efficacy of a particular intervention may depend on the type of surgical procedure, which supports the reporting of "procedure-specific" interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to document the procedure-specific evidence for analgesic interventions after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This PRISMA-compliant and PROSPERO-registered review includes randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of medication-based analgesic interventions after THA. Endpoints were postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores (rest and during mobilization), adverse events, and length of hospital stay. Fifty-eight trials with 19 different interventions were retrieved. High risk of bias, substantial differences in assessment-tools and criteria for pain, irregular reporting of adverse events, considerable differences in supplemental analgesic consumption, and basic analgesic regimens generally characterized trials. Meta-analyses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local infiltration analgesia, intrathecal opioids, and lumbar plexus block provided a 24-hour intravenous morphine-sparing effect of 14.1 (95 % confidence interval: 8.0-20.2) mg, 7.5 (3.7-11.3) mg, 19.8 (14.9-24.7) mg, and 11.9 (6.4-17.3) mg, respectively. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and lumbar plexus block were demonstrated to provide reductions in postoperative pain scores. Intrathecal opioids increased pruritus, and lumbar plexus block reduced nausea and pruritus. The GRADE-rated quality of evidence ranged from low to very low throughout the analyses. This review demonstrated, that some analgesic interventions may have the capacity to reduce mean opioid requirements and/or mean pain intensity compared with controls, but the available randomized placebo-controlled trials does not allow a designation of a "best proven intervention" for THA. © 2014 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Preventive analgesia in hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Journal Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 36 Primary studies 36 Primary studies (36 references)

Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of preventive analgesia in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed, using a defined a sensitive strategy on Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library up to May 2013. The inclusion criteria were: patients undergoing knee and/or hip arthroplasty, adults with moderate or severe pain (≥4 on a Visual Analog Scale). The intervention, the use (efficacy and safety) of pharmacological treatment (preventive) close to surgery was recorded. Oral, topical and skin patch drugs were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analysis, controlled trials and observational studies were selected. RESULTS: A total of 36 articles, of moderate quality, were selected. The patients included were representative of those undergoing knee and/or hip arthroplasty in Spain. They had a mean age >50 years, higher number of women, and reporting moderate to severe pain (≥4 on a Visual Analog Scale). Possurgical pain was mainly evaluated with a Visual Analog Scale. A wide variation was found as regards the drugs used in the preventive protocols, including acetaminophen, classic NSAID, Cox-2, opioids, corticosteroids, antidepressants, analgesics for neuropathic pain, as well as others, such as magnesium, ketamine, nimodipine or clonidine. In general, all of them decreased post-surgical pain without severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The use or one or more pre-surgical analgesics decreases the use of post-surgical drugs, at least for short term pain.

Systematic review

Unclassified

Perioperative glucocorticoids in hip and knee surgery - benefit vs. harm? A review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors Lunn TH , Kehlet H
Journal Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Year 2013
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 17 Primary studies 17 Primary studies (17 references)

Loading references information
Glucocorticoids are frequently used to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and may be part of multimodal analgesic regimes. The objective of this review was to evaluate the overall benefit vs. harm of perioperative glucocorticoids in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery. A wide search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify relevant randomized clinical trials. A systematic approach was used, starting from the PRISMA recommendations. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Studies were divided into three groups: systemic glucocorticoid administration analogous to > 10 mg or ≤ 10 mg dexamethasone, and local glucocorticoid administration. Seventeen studies with data from 1081 patients were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Benefit (of any kind) with glucocorticoid vs. placebo was reported in 15 studies. PONV was reduced with systemic glucocorticoid. Pain was reduced with high-dose systemic and local glucocorticoid, but not with low-dose systemic glucocorticoid. Systemic inflammatory markers were reduced with low-dose and high-dose systemic glucocorticoid, and with local glucocorticoid. Functional recovery was improved with local glucocorticoid. All studies were small-sized and none sufficiently powered to meaningfully evaluate uncommon adverse events. Most of the local administration studies had poor scientific quality (high risk of bias). Due to clinical heterogeneity and poor scientific quality, no meta-analysis was performed. In conclusion, in addition to PONV reduction with low-dose systemic glucocorticoid, this review supports high-dose systemic glucocorticoid to ameliorate post-operative pain after hip and knee surgery. However, large-scale safety and dose-finding studies are warranted before final recommendations.