Twelve patients with poor pain control or unacceptable side effects during treatment with morphine were switched to methadone and followed for nine months in this open prospective study. Primary outcomes were patient preference for opioid and pain control while physical, cognitive and role functioning were secondary outcomes. The morphine dose was decreased by 1/3 daily and was replaced with an equianalgesic dose of methadone over a three-day period. During switching and a one-week dose titration period, patients were given additional methadone if required. During dose titration one patient experienced sedation requiring naloxone. Four patients were switched back to morphine due to poor pain control, drowsiness or sweating. Seven patients preferred long-term (>nine months) treatment with methadone and reported reduced pain and improved functioning while cognition was not improved. This study brings novel information on the long-term consequences for pain control, health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning with a switch from morphine to methadone in the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain.
BACKGROUND: The transdermal fentanyl delivery system (fentanyl TTS; Duragesic) is currently widely available in patch strengths of 25, 50, 75, and 100 microg/h. However, a lower dose of 12 microg/h would allow optimal titration and fine tuning of the analgesic effect, and may be beneficial in certain patient populations such as the elderly or opioid-naïve. A 12 microg/h fentanyl TTS patch has been developed, and the clinical efficacy and safety tested in this single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, 28-day trial in opioid-exposed and -naïve patients with moderate to severe pain for at least 6 months.
PATIENTS: Patients were treated with fentanyl TTS for 28 days in an intent-to-treat manner starting at 12 microg/h (one patch), titrated upwards in increments of 12 mug/h to a maximum dose of 36 microg/h (three patches).
RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were enrolled. The majority of patients with a "global assessment of therapy" of fair/poor at baseline (63.4%) improved to good/very good, while 28.9% of patients with an assessment of good/very good at baseline worsened to fair/poor at endpoint. The average pain intensity levels for the efficacy evaluable population steadily decreased over the course of the trial. The adverse event (AE) profile of fentanyl TTS in this trial was generally similar to that identified in previous fentanyl TTS trials, and no unexpected safety issues or AEs were noted. Furthermore, the drop-out rate in this trial was lower than has been noted in previous trials.
CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that the lower 12 microg/h dose of fentanyl TTS provided a therapeutic benefit in non-malignant chronic pain, with a similar AE rate but a lower drop-out rate than that seen in trials at higher doses. This lower dose may, therefore, be of particular benefit to elderly or opioid-naïve patients.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate (P-ERMS)(KADIAN) for the treatment of chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain in a community-based outpatient population not satisfactorily relieved with their current therapies.
DESIGN: Phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint.
PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N = 1428) with chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain with visual numeric scale scores >or= 4 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to P-ERMS once daily in AM or PM for a 4-week treatment period. Dose increases were allowed; however, switching to twice-daily dosing was reserved until week 2.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement from baseline in pain and sleep scales (0-10) (after weeks 2 and 4), quality of life (physical and mental component summary scores of the SF-36v2 Health Survey) (week 4), and patient (weeks 2 and 4) and clinician (week 4) assessments of current therapy (-4 to +4). Patient satisfaction was assessed again 1 month after the study.
RESULTS: Approximately 70% of patients completed the study, with 2.4% (n = 34) discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and 9.6% (n = 136) discontinuing due to an adverse event. Improvements were seen in pain and sleep scores, physical and mental component scores of the SF-36v2, and patient and clinician global assessment scores (p < 0.0001, all assessments). Patients attained similar results regardless of AM vs. PM dosing. More than half (55.4%) of patients were maintained on once-daily therapy, with the remainder on a twice-daily regimen, in accordance with the prescribing information. Most adverse events (71.6%) were mild to moderate in severity, the most common being constipation (11.6%) and nausea (9.2%). One-month follow-up indicated continued satisfaction with P-ERMS vs. previous medication (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: P-ERMS was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain when used once or twice daily.
OBJECTIVE: To examine, in routine practice, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oxycodone (OxyContin) compared with standard therapy for osteoarthritis pain.
STUDY DESIGN: Open-label active-controlled randomized naturalistic 4-month study of oxycodone vs a combination of oxycodone-acetaminophen (Percocet).
METHODS: Outcomes and health resource utilization data were collected by telephone interview. Effectiveness was measured among 485 patients as the proportion having at least 20% improvement from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated from the Health Utilities Index 3 score. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per patient improved and the QALYs gained, using generic oxycodone-acetaminophen in the base case for the healthcare and societal perspectives. Uncertainty was evaluated using multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
RESULTS: Improvement occurred in 62.2% of patients with oxycodone and in 45.9% of patients with oxycodone-acetaminophen (P < .001). After adjustment for baseline differences, 0.0105 QALYs were gained with oxycodone compared with oxycodone-acetaminophen (P = .17). The mean societal costs per patient during 4 months were 7379 US dollars and 7528 US dollars for oxycodone and oxycodone-acetaminophen, respectively (P = .33). Oxycodone was more effective and less costly than oxycodone-acetaminophen based on the societal perspective (including costs associated with time lost). Based on the healthcare perspective (excluding costs associated with time lost), the cost-effectiveness of oxycodone was 4883 US dollars per patient improved and 75,810 US dollars per QALY gained. The base-case results were robust.
CONCLUSIONS: From the societal perspective, oxycodone was more effective and less costly than oxycodone-acetaminophen. From the healthcare perspective, oxycodone (compared with generic oxycodone-acetaminophen) fell within the acceptable range of cost-effectiveness between 50,000 US dollars and 100,000 US dollars per QALY gained.
OBJECTIVE: Although common treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain, such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), simple analgesics, and weak opioids, provide relief in some cases, they fail to control pain or are poorly tolerated in many cases. Strong opioids have been used to successfully treat several types of noncancer pain but have rarely been tested in controlled studies. Therefore, we tested the effects of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) in patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain, in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS: The cohort comprised patients with radiologically confirmed OA of the hip or knee (meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria) requiring joint replacement and with moderate-to-severe pain that had been inadequately controlled by weak opioids. The patients were randomized to receive TDF or placebo for 6 weeks after a 1-week pretreatment run-in phase. During study treatment, previously prescribed NSAIDs and simple analgesics were continued, but weak opioids were discontinued. All patients had access to paracetamol and metoclopramide. Pain was recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS), and function was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: Data were available for 399 patients (202 receiving TDF, 197 receiving placebo), of whom 199 (50%) completed the study. TDF provided significantly better pain relief than placebo, as demonstrated by the primary outcome measure (area under the curve for VAS scores -20 in the TDF group versus -14.6 in the placebo group; P = 0.007). TDF was also associated with significantly better overall WOMAC scores and pain scores. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and somnolence, and these occurred more often in the TDF group. CONCLUSION: TDF can reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee or hip OA.
OBJECTIVES AND METHOD: The success of effective pain treatment can best be established on the basis of a multidimensional assessment of the patient's quality of life. Within the framework of a prospective multicentre observational study, patients suffering from chronic pain were investigated for impairment of quality of life in regard to 32 different activities. The phase prior to and during treatment with fentanyl-TTS were compared. A total of 6677 patients were included in the study. The source of the pain was, forthe most part, non-tumor-related diseases. Some 64% of the patients were dissatisfied with their prior medication. The analgesics included nonopioid substances and both weak and strong opioids. 18% of the patients had received no prior opioid medication.
RESULTS: During the two-month period under observation, pain intensity decreased from an average of 7.6 +/- 1.3 to 3.1 +/- 1.6 on the visual analog scale. With regard to quality of life, more than 80% of the patients experienced an appreciable improvement. Pain reduction was particularly common in patients with pain associated with the locomotor system, where an improvement in particular in walking, mobility or driving ability and good pain control was reported. In the area of sexuality, too, a significant improvement in quality of life was to be seen. Tolerability was good.
CONCLUSION: Chronic pain can be effectively treated with fentanyl-TTS, which has a very favorable side effect profile. The reduction in pain led to an appreciable improvement in quality of life in all the areas reported bythe patients.
BACKGROUND: The analgesic effect of long-acting opioids, such as transdermal fentanyl, has been demonstrated in patients with cancer, neuropathic pain and chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the broader effect of long-acting opioids on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is less well known.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HRQoL outcomes in CLBP patients treated with transdermal fentanyl.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted at 17 clinical centers in the US. Eligible patients had CLBP diagnosis for at least 3 months and were taking short-acting opioids chronically, and then initiated transdermal fentanyl treatment. Patients completed the Treatment Outcomes in Pain Survey (TOPS), which includes the SF-36 Health Survey, at baseline and > or = 9 weeks of treatment. The HRQoL burden of CLBP was determined by comparing CLBP patients' SF-36 scores to the general US population and low back pain patient norms. HRQoL outcomes were determined by comparing baseline and follow-up TOPS and SF-36 scores. Additionally, HRQoL outcomes were evaluated across patient groups stratified by changes in pain intensity ratings as measured by an 11-point numerical rating scale.
RESULTS: At baseline CLBP patients (N = 131) scored one-to-two standard deviations (SD) below age and gender adjusted SF-36 general population norms (MANOVA F = 127.1, p < 0.0001) and significantly lower than low back pain norms (MANOVA F = 125.3, p < 0.0001). At follow-up, significant improvement (p < 0.05) was observed on six of the SF-36 scales and both SF-36 summary measures and five of the six TOPS pain-related scales. The magnitude of change in scores in effect size units among these scales ranged from 0.17 to 0.80, which are considered small to large effect size changes. HRQoL score improvement was greatest among patients experiencing the greatest pain relief.
CONCLUSION: CLBP patients who chronically used short-acting opioids showed tremendous HRQoL burden. Favorable HRQoL outcomes were observed among patients who reported pain relief.
A 52-week, multicenter, open-label extension study was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of oxymorphone extended release (ER), a novel tablet formulation of oxymorphone hydrochloride, in 153 patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related pain. Sixty-one patients (39.9%) completed the study. Common opioid-related nonserious adverse events (AEs) caused most withdrawals. However, approximately one-half of withdrawals due to AEs were among opioid-naive patients who received placebo in a previous trial and were started on a dose of 20 mg every 12 hours, suggesting that tolerability can be improved by titrating from a lower initial dose. Mean pain scores initially decreased as previously opioid-naive patients achieved adequate pain relief, reached stable levels after the first 6 weeks, and remained stable at mild levels throughout the remainder of the study (average pain, 20-25 mm on 100-mm Visual Analog Scale). Average daily dosing remained stable throughout the study (median, 40 mg/d). At each assessment, at least 80% of patients rated their global satisfaction with oxymorphone ER as "excellent," "very good," or "good." Oxymorphone ER provides a new 12-hour analgesic for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related pain in patients who may require long-term opioid therapy.
STUDY DESIGN: Open, randomized, parallel group multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) and sustained release morphine (SRM) in strong-opioid naïve patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most studies of TDF and SRM have involved patients already receiving strong opioids. This is the first large-scale study focusing on strong-opioid naïve patients with CLBP. METHODS: Adults with CLBP requiring regular strong opioid therapy received either TDF or SRM for 13 months. Starting doses were 25 microg/hr fentanyl patches every 72 hours or 30 mg oral morphine every 12 hours. Doses were adjusted according to response. Participants assessed pain relief and bowel function using weekly diaries. Other assessments, including quality of life, disease progression, and side effects, were made by patients and investigators. RESULTS: Data from 680 patients showed that TDF and SRM provided similar levels of pain relief, but TDF was associated with significantly less constipation than SRM, indicating a greater likelihood of satisfactory pain relief without unmanageable constipation for patients receiving TDF. Other ratings were similar for TDF and SRM, but TDF provided greater relief of pain at rest and at night. CONCLUSIONS: TDF and SRM provided equivalent levels of pain relief, but TDF was associated with less constipation. This study indicates that sustained-release strong opioids can safely be used in strong-opioid naïve patients.
INTRODUCTION: Tramadol hydrochloride is a centrally acting analgesic, which possesses opioid agonist properties and activates monoaminergic spinal inhibition of pain. An oral, once a day, sustained release formulation of tramadol is thought to be advantageous compared with immediate release preparations as it prevents plasma peaks associated with increased side-effects of the drug. It may also improve compliance. The purpose of the study was to assess the long-term safety of a new sustained-release formulation of tramadol (tramadol LP) in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and in patients with refractory low back pain.
STUDY DESIGN: The design was a phase III, open, multicentre, international, tolerability study with tramadol LP at a dose titrated by the patient between 100 and 400 mg once daily, according to the intensity of pain. The treatment was administered for a continuous period of 4 weeks followed by an intermittent intake of 5 months in 204 patients. The safety criteria for evaluation were recording of adverse events, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, radiography, global tolerability assessed by the patient and the investigators.
RESULTS: Long-term use of tramadol LP was reasonably well tolerated. Most of the reported adverse events were expected and occurred within the first month of treatment. Roughly half of the patients (49%) reported adverse events, of which 66% were related to treatment. Gastrointestinal events (nausea and vomiting) were the most frequent. Serious adverse events were reported in 6.4% of patients, from which only two cases were related to treatment. There was no sign of tolerance development and the percentage of patients presenting withdrawal symptoms after the end of treatment was low (6%).
CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with tramadol LP once daily is generally safe in patients with osteoarthritis or refractory low back pain.
Twelve patients with poor pain control or unacceptable side effects during treatment with morphine were switched to methadone and followed for nine months in this open prospective study. Primary outcomes were patient preference for opioid and pain control while physical, cognitive and role functioning were secondary outcomes. The morphine dose was decreased by 1/3 daily and was replaced with an equianalgesic dose of methadone over a three-day period. During switching and a one-week dose titration period, patients were given additional methadone if required. During dose titration one patient experienced sedation requiring naloxone. Four patients were switched back to morphine due to poor pain control, drowsiness or sweating. Seven patients preferred long-term (>nine months) treatment with methadone and reported reduced pain and improved functioning while cognition was not improved. This study brings novel information on the long-term consequences for pain control, health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning with a switch from morphine to methadone in the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain.
