Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
39 articles (39 References) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Kim SH , Kim SI , Ok SY , Park SY , Kim MG , Lee SJ , Noh JI , Chun HR , Suh H
Journal Korean journal of anesthesiology
Year 2013
Loading references information
Background: The opioid sparing effect of low dose ketamine is influenced by bolus dose, infusion rate, duration of infusion, and differences in the intensity of postoperative pain. In this study, we investigated the opioid sparing effect of low dose ketamine in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl after lumbar spinal fusion surgery, which can cause severe postoperative pain. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly assigned to receive one of three study medications (K1 group: ketamine infusion of 1 μg/kg/min following bolus 0.5 mg/kg, K2 group: ketamine infusion of 2 μg/kg/min following bolus 0.5 mg/kg, Control group: saline infusion following bolus of saline). Continuous infusion of ketamine began before skin incision intraoperatively, and continued until 48 h postoperatively. For postoperative pain control, patients were administered fentanyl using IV-PCA (bolus dose 15 μg of fentanyl, lockout interval of 5 min, no basal infusion). For 48 h postoperatively, the total amount of fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain score, adverse effects and patients' satisfaction were evaluated. Results: The total amount of fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the K2 group (474 μg) compared to the control group (826 μg) and the K1 group (756 μg) during the 48 h after surgery. Pain scores at rest or with movement, the incidence of adverse events and patient satisfaction were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions: Low-dose ketamine at 2 μg/kg/min following bolus 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced the total amount of fentanyl consumption during the 48 h after lumbar spinal fusion surgery without increasing adverse effects. © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2013.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal European journal of anaesthesiology
Year 2013
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
Year 2013
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain may suffer from inadequate postoperative pain control. Ketamine is an adjuvant demonstrating analgesic and opioid-sparing effects. We hypothesize that an intravenous ketamine infusion in addition to opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) improves postoperative pain relief in this patient population. METHODS: We evaluated 64 patients with chronic pain taking opioids undergoing nononcologic surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either postoperative hydromorphone PCA and continuous ketamine (0.2 mg/kg/hour), or hydromorphone PCA and saline. Patients provided numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores for "worst," "average," and "least" pain following surgery. The primary outcome measure was change in patients' postoperative NRS scores compared with baseline NRS. Secondary and tertiary outcomes included postoperative day one 24-hour opioid use and the amount of opioid used 24 hours prior to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Baseline patient characteristics were similar with the exception of age. Patients using ketamine had decreased "average" pain scores (percent change between postoperative and preoperative NRS) after surgery (13.5% decrease in the ketamine group vs 15.5% increase in NRS in the placebo group, P = 0.0057). There were no differences in "worst" or "least" pain scores or postoperative opioid use. Side effects between groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that a postoperative ketamine infusion at 0.2 mg/kg/hour in addition to opioids results in a statistically significant reduction of "average" pain scores in patients undergoing surgery who take opioids for chronic pain. However, "least" and "worst" pain scores and the amount of opioid used postoperatively did not differ between groups. Thus, the use of a postoperative ketamine infusion at 0.2 mg/kg/hour provides limited benefit in improving pain management for this challenging population.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Hadi BA , Daas R , Zelkó R
Journal Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society
Year 2013
Loading references information
Aim: The hypothesis that postoperative pain would be reduced by using 1. μg/kg/min of ketamine, both intra- and post-operatively, for lumbar microdiscectomy surgery was assessed by measuring morphine consumption. Patient side effects were reported. Methods: Forty-five patients undergoing microdiscectomy surgery were randomized under double-blind conditions into three groups: Group1 (G1) received normal saline, Group 2 (G2) ketamine (1. μg/kg/min) intra-operatively and Group 3 (G3) ketamine (1. μg/kg/min) both intra- and post-operatively. Morphine consumption, pain scores, nausea and vomiting, CNS disorders were recorded for 24. h post surgery. This study was conducted by applying the concept of a clinical pharmacist intervention. Results: The time for the first analgesia demand dose was significantly shorter (P<0.05) in G117 ± 1.7. min than for G2 and G3. In G3 morphine consumption 6, 12, and 24. h after surgery was 3 ± 2.26, 9.2 ± 2.11 and 26.9 ± 2.71. mg. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower for G3 than for G1 or G2 (P<0.05). The visual analog scale score (VAS) values were significantly lower in G3 (P<0.05) than for the other groups during the first 24. h. The rate of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in G1 vs G3 (P<0.05). No difference in drug induced CNS disturbances was observed among the groups. Conclusions: Using 1. μg/kg/min of ketamine hydrochloride intra- and post-operatively for microdiscectomy surgery could be an adjunct therapy to reduce postoperative morphine consumption minimizing its side effects. Collaborative clinical pharmacy practice on the basis of pharmacology had an effective role in improving the general outcome of microdiscectomy surgery. © 2012.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Parikh B , Maliwad J , Shah VR
Journal Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Year 2011
Loading references information
Background: N-methyl D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors seem to be responsible for pain memory and their blockade can contribute significantly in prevention of pain. This study was conducted to evaluate the preventive effect of small dose of ketamine, a NMDA receptor blocker, given before skin incision in renal surgery, with the aim to compare analgesic efficacy, intra operative and post-operative side effects. Materials and Methods: In a prospective double-blind study, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk I and II adult patients scheduled for elective open renal surgeries by flank incision were randomly divided in two groups. Ketamine group (group K) received ketamine 0.15 mg/kg intravenously, 30 minute before start of surgery followed by infusion of ketamine 2 mcg/kg/min till start of skin closure. Control group (group C) received normal saline in place of ketamine. Both groups received morphine 0.15 mg/ kg i.v. at the time of skin closure. The analgesic efficacy was judged by visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and on movement, time to first analgesic and morphine consumption in 24 hours. Opioid or ketamine related side effects were also recorded. Results: Patients in ketamine group had significantly lower VAS score, longer time to first analgesic (21.6 ± 0.12 Vs 3.8 ± 0.7 hrs), and lower morphine consumption (5.8 ± 1.48 Vs 18.1 ± 1.6 mg) in 24 hours. There were no demonstrable side effects related to ketamine in group K whereas incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher in group C. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that small dose of ketamine decreases post-operative pain, reduces morphine consumption, and delays patients request for analgesia beyond the clinical duration of action of ketamine after open renal surgery.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
Year 2011
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: In literature, there is controversy on the use of ketamine for management of postoperative pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of pre-incisional intravenous or subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine on postoperative pain relief after open cholecystectomy. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for open cholecystectomy was enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were divided into four groups of 30 each and received subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine 1 mg/kg (group KS1), subcutaneous infiltration of ketamine 2 mg/kg (group KS2), intravenous ketamine 1 mg/kg (group KI), or subcutaneous infiltration of normal saline 20 mL (group C) before surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) values and analgesic consumption were evaluated for 24 hours after operation. RESULTS: VAS scores were significantly lower at arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, 15 and 30 minutes in Group KS1, Group KS2, and Group KI compared with Group C (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). In Group KS2, VAS scores were significantly lower than Group KS1 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after operation in Group KS1, Group KS2, and Group KI compared with Group C (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). In Group KS2, VAS scores were significantly lower than Group KS1 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: A 2 mg/kg dose of subcutaneous infiltration ketamine or 1 mg/kg dose of intravenous ketamine given at approximately 15 minutes before surgery provides an adjunctive analgesia during 24 hours after surgery in patients undergoing cholecystectomy surgery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal The Korean journal of pain
Year 2011
Loading references information
Background: Although early reviews of clinical findings were mostly negative, there is still a widespread belief for the efficacy of preemptive analgesia among clinicians. In this study, we evaluated whether the preemptive use of ketamine decreases post operative pain in patients undergoing appendectomy. Methods: In double-blind, randomized clinical trials, 80 adult male patients undergoing an operation for acute appendicitis were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the operating room, patients in the ketamine group received 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine IV 10 minutes before the surgical incision. In the control group, 0.5 mg/kg of normal saline was injected. The pain intensity was assessed at time 0 (immediately after arousal) and 4, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively using the 10 points visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Eighty patients (40 for both groups) were enrolled in this study. For all of the evaluated times, the VAS score was significantly lower in the ketamine group compared to the control. The interval time for the first analgesic request was 23.1 ± 6.7 minutes for the case group and 18.1 ± 7.3 minutes for the control (P = 0.02). The total number of pethidine injections in the first 24 hours postoperatively was 0.6 ± 0.6 for the case group and 2.0 ± 0.8 for the controls (P = 0.032). There were no drug side effects for the case group. Conclusions: A low dose of intravenously administered ketamine had a preemptive effect in reducing pain after appendectomy. © The Korean Pain Society, 2011.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
Year 2011
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effect of low dose ketamine in patients with preoperative narcotic intake undergoing major spine surgery. DESIGN: The study used a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Settings and PATIENTS: We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of low dose IV ketamine infusion after major spine surgery in patients with preoperative narcotic analgesic intake. Ketamine group received IV ketamine infusion (2 µg/kg/min) and saline group received saline intraoperatively and the first 24 hours postoperatively. In addition, all patients received IV patient-controlled hydromorphone and epidural bupivacaine. Outcome Measures: Pain scores, narcotic requirement, and side effects were compared between the groups for 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the study (N = 15 in each group). No difference in pain scores at rest and movement was noted between the groups (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). Patients in ketamine group received 40.42 ± 32.86 mg IV hydromorphone at 48 hours compared with 38.24 ± 26.19 mg in saline group (<i>P</i> = 0.84). Central nervous system side effects were observed in five (33%) ketamine group patients compared with nine (60%) in saline group (<i>P</i> = 0.29). CONCLUSION: The addition of IV very low dose ketamine infusion regimen did not improve postoperative analgesia. Side effects were not increased with low dose ketamine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Anesthesiology
Year 2010
Loading references information
BACKGROUND:: Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist that has been shown to be useful in the reduction of acute postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in a variety of surgical interventions with variable routes of administration. Little is known regarding its efficacy in opiate-dependent patients with a history of chronic pain. We hypothesized that ketamine would reduce postoperative opiate consumption in this patient population. METHODS:: This was a randomized, prospective, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial involving opiate-dependent patients undergoing major lumbar spine surgery. Fifty-two patients in the treatment group were administered 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ketamine on induction of anesthesia, and a continuous infusion at 10 mug kgmin was begun on induction and terminated at wound closure. Fifty patients in the placebo group received saline of equivalent volume. Patients were observed for 48 h postoperatively and followed up at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was 48-h morphine consumption. RESULTS:: Total morphine consumption (morphine equivalents) was significantly reduced in the treatment group 48 h after the procedure. It was also reduced at 24 h and at 6 weeks. The average reported pain intensity was significantly reduced in the postanesthesia care unit and at 6 weeks. The groups had no differences in known ketamine- or opiate-related side effects. CONCLUSIONS:: Intraoperative ketamine reduces opiate consumption in the 48-h postoperative period in opiate-dependent patients with chronic pain. Ketamine may also reduce opioid consumption and pain intensity throughout the postoperative period in this patient population. This benefit is without an increase in side effects.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Anesthesia and analgesia
Year 2009
Loading references information
BACKGROUND:: Gabapentin and ketamine are popular analgesic adjuvants for improving perioperative pain management. We designed this double-blind, placebo-controlled study to test and compare the preventive effects of perioperative ketamine and gabapentin on early and chronic pain after elective hysterectomy. METHODS:: Sixty patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: control group received oral placebo capsules and bolus plus infusion of saline; ketamine group received oral placebo capsules and, before incision, 0.3 mg/kg IV bolus and 0.05 mg•kg-1•h-1 infusion of ketamine until the end of surgery; and gabapentin group received oral gabapentin 1.2 g and bolus plus infusion of saline. The anesthetic technique was standardized, and the postoperative assessments included verbal rating scales for pain and sedation, IV morphine usage, quality of recovery assessment, recovery of bowel function, resumption of normal activities, and patient satisfaction with their pain management. Patients were questioned at 1, 3, and 6 mo after surgery for chronic postoperative pain. RESULTS:: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the gabapentin group compared with the ketamine and control groups, and patient-controlled analgesia morphine use was significantly reduced in both treatment groups (versus control group) (P < 0.001). Total patient-controlled analgesia morphine use was decreased by 35% and 42% in the ketamine and gabapentin groups, respectively, compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with pain treatment was significantly improved in the ketamine and gabapentin groups compared with the control group (P < 0.001).The incidence of incisional pain and related pain scores at the 1-, 3-, and 6-mo follow-up were significantly lower in the gabapentin group compared with the ketamine and control groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:: Gabapentin and ketamine are similar in improving early pain control and in decreasing opioid consumption; however, gabapentin also prevented chronic pain in the first 6 postoperative months. Copyright © 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society.