Can switching to abatacept therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on background methotrexate reverse TNF-inhibitor-induced antinuclear autoantibody/double-stranded DNA autoantibody conversion? An analysis of the AMPLE and ATTEST trials.

Authors
Category Primary study
JournalClinical and experimental rheumatology
Year 2019

This article is not included in any systematic review

This article is part of the following publication threads:
  • AMPLE [Abatacept versus Adalimumab Comparison in Biologic-Naive RA Subjects with Background Methotrexate] (8 documents)
  • ATTEST [Abatacept or infliximab vs placebo, a Trial for Tolerability, Efficacy and Safety in Treating rheumatoid arthritis] (7 documents)
Loading references information

OBJECTIVES:

To explore antinuclear autoantibody (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) autoantibody development during abatacept and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, and effects of switching from TNFi to abatacept in ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-positive patients.

METHODS:

This was a post hoc analysis of biologic-naïve patients with active RA in ATTEST and AMPLE. In AMPLE, patients received subcutaneous abatacept or adalimumab (2 years). In ATTEST, patients received intravenous abatacept or infliximab (1 year), or placebo (6 months) then abatacept (6 months); at 1 year, all patients could receive abatacept (open-label long-term extension). Serum ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody levels were measured at baseline, Month 6 (ATTEST only), Years 1 and 2.

RESULTS:

At baseline, 25.7 and 0.9% (AMPLE), and 21.6 and 8.4% of patients (ATTEST) were ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody positive, respectively. More baseline ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-negative patients became positive during TNFi than abatacept treatment. In ATTEST (TNFi group), 48.5% (48/99; ANA) and 48.3% (57/118; anti-dsDNA) of patients seroconverted to positive status by Year 1, falling to 22.4% (22/98 ANA) and 13.3% (15/113; anti-dsDNA) by Year 2 after switching to abatacept. Of ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-positive patients at Year 1, 41.9% and 68.9%, were negative at Year 2.

CONCLUSIONS:

ANA/anti-dsDNA seroconversion was more frequent with TNFi than abatacept therapy; TNFi-associated seroconversion decreased after switching from TNFi to abatacept.
Epistemonikos ID: be7ab56d2a0f6b89637fdab4f8c5dfa5681c188d
First added on: Mar 24, 2022