Broad syntheses related to this topic

loading
3 References (3 articles) loading Revert Studify

Broad synthesis / Living FRISBEE

Unclassified

Authors Rain C , Seguel W , Vergara L
Journal Medwave
Year 2015
Loading references information
It has been proposed that fibromyalgia could be managed by pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Regular physical exercise is commonly used as a non-pharmacological intervention. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening 30 databases, we identified 14 systematic reviews including 25 randomized trials. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table following the GRADE approach. We conclude that regular physical exercise probably reduces pain in patients with fibromyalgia.

Broad synthesis / Overview of systematic reviews

Unclassified

Authors Ruddy R , House A
Journal The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
Year 2005
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: When planning and delivering a liaison psychiatry service it is important to have an understanding of the research evidence supporting the use of interventions likely to be delivered by the service. AIMS: To identify high-quality systematic reviews for all interventions in three defined areas of liaison psychiatry, to summarise their clinical implications and to highlight areas where more research is needed. The three areas were the psychological effects of physical illness or treatment, somatoform disorders and self-harming behaviour. METHOD: Computerised database searching, secondary reference searching, hand-searching and expert consultation were used to identify relevant systematic reviews. Studies were reliably selected, and quality-assessed, and data were extracted and interpreted by two reviewers. RESULTS: We found 64 high-quality systematic reviews. Only 14 reviews included meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Many areas of liaison psychiatry practice are not based on high-quality evidence. More research in this area would help inform development and planning of liaison psychiatry services.

Broad synthesis / Overview of systematic reviews

Unclassified

Authors Ospina, M , Harstall, C
Report Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Year 2003
Loading references information
• The approach taken to evaluate the current published scientific evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness and economic consequences of multidisciplinary pain programs (MPPs) for patients with chronic pain (CP) not related to cancer, was to analyze and synthesize the findings from systematic reviews (SRs) including meta-analyses. Given the cost and consequences of CP, whether MPPs are therapeutically and financially effective are important issues of consideration. • MPPs in this report are defined as being a comprehensive approach that involves coordinated interventions among a variety of disciplines working together in the same facility in an integrated way with joint goals and with ongoing communication. The patient is considered to be an active participant who assumes significant responsibility within the rehabilitation process with the staff playing a teaching and consulting role. • The rationale for MPPs as a therapeutic approach is to provide simultaneous assessment and management of somatic, behavioural and psychosocial components of CP. MPPs aim to improve quality of life outcomes, to increase patient independence and to restore physical, psychological, social, and occupational functioning. • Treatment strategies available at MPPs usually vary from centre to centre in terms of the setting (inpatient versus outpatient), number of hours and days involved, and type, intensity, and nature of treatment modalities offered. Patients seen at MPPs are often not representative of all those with CP and alternatively, not all CP patients should attend MPPs. As tertiary centres, MPPs are generally selected for patients with complex and long-standing pain problems. • From the twelve SRs on the effectiveness of MPPs, five met the inclusion criteria. Four of these SRs focused on MPPs as the primary intervention of interest, whereas one SR considered MPPs among several other interventions. • The results from a recent good quality SR tend to support the effectiveness of intensive MPPs for chronic low back pain patients in terms of their effects on functional improvement and pain reduction. The results from one clinical trial included in one of the SRs support the use of MPPs in patients with chronic pelvic pain in terms of daily activity level and self-rating scales. • The other SRs found limited evidence and therefore the findings were considered to be inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of MPPs in managing CP in other conditions such as fibromyalgia and widespread musculoskeletal pain, and shoulder and neck pain.