Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
2 articles (2 References) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

An updated meta-analysis of amantadine for treating dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease.

blocked
Authors Kong M , Ba M , Ren C , Yu L , Dong S , Yu G , Liang H
Journal Oncotarget
Year 2017
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

This article includes 11 Primary studies 11 Primary studies (11 references)

Loading references information
In recent years, a few of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about amantadine for treating dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) were completed. Here, we conducted a systematic literature review about the clinical research to provide the updated evidence for treating dyskinesia. Electronic search of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other databases up to May 2016 for relevant studies was performed. We selected the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale IV (UPDRS IV) and Dyskinesia Rating Scales (DRS) as efficacy outcomes of amantadine on dyskinesia. Pooled data from included studies was then used to carry out meta-analysis. A total of eleven eligible RCTs that involved 356 PD patients with existing dyskinesia were included in the present study. The results of meta-analysis showed that amantadine significantly improved UPDRS IV (P < 0.0001) and DRS (P < 0.00001). Meanwhile, there was a mild reduction in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III after amantadine treatment in advanced PD patients with dyskinesia (P = 0.01) compared with placebo. High dosage of amantadine obviously improved existing dyskinesia in PD, yet at the expense of the increased adverse events. It was necessary to detect the optimal therapeutic efficacy to balance the incidence of adverse events when we used amantadine to treat existing dyskinesia in PD patients.

Systematic review

Unclassified

N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists in levodopa induced dyskinesia: A meta-analysis.

Authors Elahi B , Phielipp N , Chen R
Journal The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques
Year 2012
Links Pubmed DOI

This article includes 11 Primary studies 11 Primary studies (11 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) are amongst the most disabling side-effects of levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been suggested that that N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist may reduce peak-dose dyskinesia in PD patients and may lead to motor improvement. In this study, we compared the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists versus placebo in the treatment of L ID in PD through a meta-analysis of controlled trials. METHODS: Electronic search of Pubmed (1990 - 2010), Medline (1966-2010), EMBASE (1974-2010) and other databases for relevant studies were performed. Controlled clinical trials of the effects of NMDA antagonists on L ID that fulfill the study protocol were selected. Pooled data from included studies was then used to perform random and fixed effect models meta-analysis. RESULTS: The search resulted in 11 randomized, placebo controlled clinical trials that involved a total of 253 PD patients with peak-dose LID. The outcome measures were various dyskinesia rating scales and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscales III and IV. The analysis showed significant reduction in Standard Mean Difference (SMD) for UPDRS IV (SMD -1.45; 95% CI -2.28 to -0.63) and UPDRS III (SMD -0.41; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.12) after treatment with amantadine. Other included drugs did not show significant change in the outcomes measured. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides an update on the clinical trials and confirms the short-term benefits of amantadine therapy in the treatment of dyskinesia. The effects of other NMDA receptor antagonists need to be evaluated further in clinical trials. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)