Primary studies related to this topic

loading
13 References (13 articles) Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain.

Authors Afilalo M , Morlion B
Journal Pain physician
Year 2013
Links Pubmed

This article is included in 4 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (4 references)

Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer-related pain affects a large proportion of the adult population and is often difficult to manage effectively. Although opioid analgesics have been used to relieve chronic pain of different etiologies, opioids are associated with a range of side effects that may reduce patient quality of life and lead to reduced compliance with treatment.Tapentadol is a centrally acting analgesic with 2 mechanisms of action, μ-opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, that is available in an extended-release formulation for the management of chronic pain. OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for the management of moderate to severe chronic nociceptive and neuropathic pain. METHODS: Efficacy results are summarized for four 15-week phase 3 studies of tapentadol ER in patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis knee pain (2 studies; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00421928 and NCT00486811), low back pain (NCT00449176), and pain related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN; NCT00455520); a one-year phase 3 study of tapentadol ER in patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis pain or low back pain (NCT00361504); and a pooled analysis of data from the 15-week studies in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain or low back pain. A summary of the comparative tolerability for tapentadol ER and the active comparator used in these studies, oxycodone controlled release (CR), is provided. RESULTS: Results of these studies showed that tapentadol ER (100 - 250 mg bid) was effective for the management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis knee pain, low back pain, and pain related to DPN. Tapentadol ER (100 - 250 mg bid) has been shown to provide comparable pain relief to oxycodone HCl CR (20 - 50 mg bid) for chronic osteoarthritis knee pain and low back pain over up to one year of treatment. Tapentadol ER (100 - 250 mg bid) was associated with an improved tolerability profile, particularly gastrointestinal tolerability profile, and with lower rates of treatment discontinuations and adverse event-related discontinuations compared with oxycodone HCl CR (50 - 250 mg bid) over up to one year of treatment in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain and low back pain. LIMITATIONS: Differences in the design and duration of these phase 3 studies may limit comparisons of the efficacy results; nevertheless, this summary of efficacy results demonstrates the broad efficacy of tapentadol ER for different types of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Tapentadol ER (100 - 250 mg bid) is effective for moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain, low back pain, and pain related to DPN and provides efficacy similar to that of oxycodone HCl CR (20 - 50 mg bid) for patients with osteoarthritis and low back pain. Tapentadol ER treatment has been associated with better gastrointestinal tolerability and compliance with therapy than oxycodone CR, which suggests that tapentadol ER may be a better option for the long-term management of chronic pain.

Primary study

Unclassified

Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Tapentadol Extended Release for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain or Osteoarthritis Pain

Journal Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain
Year 2010
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 7 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (7 references)

Loading references information
Background: Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with 2 mechanisms of action: μ-opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. This randomized, open-label phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00361504) assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release (ER) in patients with chronic knee or hip osteoarthritis pain or low back pain.Methods: Patients were randomized 4:1 to receive controlled, adjustable, oral, twice-daily doses of tapentadol ER (100 to 250mg) or oxycodone HCl controlled release (CR; 20 to 50mg) for up to 1 year. Efficacy evaluations included assessments at each study visit of average pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale) over the preceding 24 hours. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations were monitored throughout the study.Results: A total of 1,117 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug. Mean (standard error) pain intensity scores in the tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, were 7.6 (0.05) and 7.6 (0.11) at baseline and decreased to 4.4 (0.09) and 4.5 (0.17) at endpoint. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 85.7% in the tapentadol ER group and 90.6% in the oxycodone CR group. In the tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, TEAEs led to discontinuation in 22.1% and 36.8% of patients; gastrointestinal TEAEs led to discontinuation in 8.6% and 21.5% of patients.Conclusion: Tapentadol ER (100 to 250mg bid) was associated with better gastrointestinal tolerability than oxycodone HCl CR (20 to 50mg bid) and provided sustainable relief of moderate to severe chronic knee or hip osteoarthritis or low back pain for up to 1 year. © 2010 World Institute of Pain.

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled Phase III study

Journal Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy
Year 2010
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 12 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (12 references)

Loading references information
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) for the management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Research design: Patients (N 981) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tapentadol ER 100 250 mg b.i.d., oxycodone HCl controlled release (CR) 20 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo over 15 weeks (3-week titration period, 12-week maintenance period). Main outcome measures: Efficacy was assessed as change from baseline in average pain intensity (11-point NRS) at week 12 of the maintenance period and throughout the maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing pain scores. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results: Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (least squares mean difference vs placebo [95% confidence interval], -0.8 [-1.22, -0.47]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (-0.7 [-1.06,-0.35]; p < 0.001). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity versus placebo at week 12 (-0.9 [-1.24,-0.49]; p < 0.001) and throughout the maintenance period (-0.8 [-1.16,-0.46]; p < 0.001). Tapentadol ER was associated with a lower incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) than oxycodone CR. Gastrointestinal TEAEs, including constipation, nausea, and vomiting, were among the most commonly reported TEAEs (placebo, 26.3%; tapentadol ER, 43.7%; oxycodone CR, 61.9%). The odds of experiencing constipation or the composite of nausea and/or vomiting were significantly lower with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tapentadol ER (100 250 mg b.i.d.) effectively relieved moderate to severe chronic low back pain over 15 weeks and had better gastrointestinal tolerability than oxycodone HCl CR (20 50 mg b.i.d.). © 2010 Informa UK Ltd.

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release compared with oxycodone controlled release for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-and active-controlled phase III study

Journal Clinical drug investigation
Year 2010
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 10 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (10 references)

Loading references information
Background: Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with m-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor activity. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) compared with oxycodone controlled release (CR) for management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-and placebocontrolled, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase III study during which patients received tapentadol ER, oxycodone CR or placebo for a 3-week titration period followed by a 12-week maintenance period. The study was carried out at sites in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US. A total of 1030 patients with chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain were randomized to receive tapentadol ER 100-250mg twice daily, oxycodone HCl CR 20-50mg twice daily or placebo. Primary endpoints (as determined prior to initiation of the study) were the changes from baseline in average daily pain intensity (rated by patients on an 11-point numerical rating scale) over the last week of maintenance and over the entire 12-week maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing values after early treatment discontinuation. Results: Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 1023 patients. Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline to week 12 of the maintenance period versus placebo (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% CI],-0.7 [-1.04,-0.33]), and throughout the maintenance period (-0.7 [-1.00,-0.33]). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline throughout the maintenance period versus placebo (LSM difference [95% CI],-0.3 [-0.67,-0.00]) but not at week 12 (-0.3 [-0.68, 0.02]). A significantly higher percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the tapentadol ER group (32.0% [110/344]) compared with the placebo group (24.3% [82/337]; p = 0.027), indicating a clinically significant improvement in pain intensity, while a significantly lower percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the oxycodone CR group (17.3% [59/342]; p = 0.023 vs placebo). In the placebo, tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, 61.1%(206/337), 75.9%(261/344) and 87.4% (299/342) of patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs were 26.1% (88/337), 43.0% (148/344) and 67.3% (230/342). Conclusion: Treatment with tapentadol ER 100-250mg twice daily or oxycodone HCl CR 20-50mg twice daily was effective for the management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain, with substantially lower incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs associated with treatment with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR. © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Primary study

Unclassified

A randomized study to demonstrate noninferiority of once-daily OROS® hydromorphone with twice-daily sustained-release oxycodone for moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain.

Journal Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain
Year 2010
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference)

Loading references information
This was a randomized, open-label, comparative, parallel group study designed to demonstrate the noninferiority of once-daily OROS<sup>®</sup> hydromorphone compared with twice-daily sustained-release (SR) oxycodone in subjects with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy. The core phase (24 weeks) consisted of titration and maintenance periods. This was followed by an optional extension phase (28 weeks), which collected data used to assess long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. Five hundred four subjects were randomized between the 2 treatment groups. The primary efficacy analysis showed that OROS hydromorphone was noninferior to SR oxycodone (<i>P</i> = 0.011) as measured by change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscore “pain right now.” The treatment difference with respect to change in BPI pain severity subscore “pain right now” was 0.29 (95% confidence interval: −0.27 to 0.84). The equianalgesic doses were 16 mg OROS hydromorphone and 40 mg SR oxycodone (median values). Secondary outcomes included other BPI scale items, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Indices, and quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Both treatment groups showed improvements in the main secondary efficacy endpoints. No statistically significant differences were shown between the treatment groups, except for the scores for somnolence (MOS sleep subscale) and physical functioning (SF-36), which both had a statistically significant difference between treatments groups in favor of OROS hydromorphone. Both study medications had equivalent and acceptable safety profiles. The results of this open-label study showed that once-daily OROS hydromorphone is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain and as efficacious as twice-daily SR oxycodone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 μg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: A 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study

Authors Karlsson M , Berggren AC
Journal Clinical therapeutics
Year 2009
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 4 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (4 references)

Loading references information
Objective: This study compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches and prolonged-release tramadol tablets in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain of the hip and/or knee. Methods: Eligible patients were adults with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of OA of the hip and/or knee and moderate to severe pain, as confirmed by a mean Box Scale 11 (BS-11) score ≥4 while using paracetamol 4000 mg/d for pain during the screening week. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-dose 7-day buprenorphine patches (patch strengths of 5, 10, and 20 μg/h, with a maximum dosage of 20 μg/h) or twice-daily prolonged-release tramadol tablets (tablet strengths of 75, 100, 150, and 200 mg, with a maximum dosage of 400 mg/d) over a 12-week open-label treatment period. Supplementary paracetamol was available as rescue medication throughout the study. The primary end point was the difference in BS-11 scores from baseline to the completion of treatment. Noninferiority was assumed if the treatment difference on the BS-11 scale was -1.5 boxes, indicating a clinically meaningful result. Secondary efficacy variables were rescue medication use, sleep disturbance and quality of sleep, and patients' and investigators' global assessments of pain relief. In addition, patient preference was assessed at the completion visit by asking patients whether, given equal pain relief, they would prefer basic treatment for OA pain with a patch applied once weekly or a tablet taken twice daily. Exploratory variables included investigators' assessments of patients' pain, stiffness, and ability to perform daily activities (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index); patients' quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D health states index and EuroQol visual analog scale); and abuse and diversion of study drug. Results: One hundred thirty-four patients (69 receiving 7-day buprenorphine patches and 65 receiving tramadol tablets) were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication. A respective 98.6% and 100% of the 2 treatment groups were white, with mean (SD) ages of 64.4 (11.1) and 64.2 (9.3) years. Both treatments were associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain from baseline to study completion. The least squares mean change from baseline in BS-11 scores in the 7-day buprenorphine patch and tramadol tablet groups was -2.26 (95% CI, -2.76 to -1.76) and -2.09 (95% CI, -2.61 to -1.58). The efficacy of 7-day buprenorphine patches was noninferior to that of prolonged-release tramadol tablets. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the 2 treatment groups: 226 AEs were reported in 61 patients (88.4%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group, and 152 AEs were reported in 51 patients (78.5%) in the tramadol group. Ten patients (14.5%) in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 19 (29.2%) in the tramadol tablet group withdrew from the study due to AEs. The most common AEs in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group were nausea (30.4%), constipation (18.8%), and dizziness (15.9%); the most common AEs in the tramadol tablet group were nausea (24.6%), fatigue (18.5%), and pain (12.3%). Most patients (47/67 [70.1%] in the 7-day buprenorphine patch group and 43/61 [70.5%] in the tramadol tablet group) reported that they would prefer a 7-day patch to a twice-daily tablet for future pain treatment. Conclusions: In these patients with chronic, moderate to severe OA pain of the hip and/or knee, 7-day low-dose buprenorphine patches were an effective and well-tolerated analgesic. The buprenorphine patches were noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol tablets. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number: 2006-003233-32. © 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

Primary study

Unclassified

Tolerability of tapentadol immediate release in patients with lower back pain or osteoarthritis of the hip or knee over 90 days: a randomized, double-blind study.

Journal Current medical research and opinion
Year 2009
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference)

Loading references information
<b>OBJECTIVE: </b>Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with two mechanisms of action, mu-opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, in a single molecule. This phase III, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluated the tolerability of tapentadol immediate release (IR) and oxycodone IR for low back pain or osteoarthritis pain (hip or knee), using flexible dosing over 90 days.<b>METHODS: </b>Patients (N = 878) were randomly assigned (4:1 ratio) to receive tapentadol IR (50 or 100 mg, q4-6h, p.o.) or oxycodone IR (10 or 15 mg, q4-6h, p.o.). Tapentadol IR was evaluated for tolerability over 90 days, tolerability relative to oxycodone IR, withdrawal symptoms, and pain intensity. This study was not placebo-controlled, which limited efficacy evaluations.<b>RESULTS: </b>In total, 849 intent-to-treat patients received tapentadol IR (n = 679) or oxycodone IR (n = 170), and among these, 391 patients (57.6%) in the tapentadol IR group and 86 patients (50.6%) in the oxycodone IR group completed the study. Gastrointestinal events, including nausea (18.4% vs 29.4%), vomiting (16.9% vs 30.0%), and constipation (12.8% vs 27.1%), were reported by 44.2% of patients receiving tapentadol IR and 63.5% of patients receiving oxycodone IR, respectively. Nervous system events, including dizziness (18.1% vs 17.1%), headache (11.5% vs 10.0%), and somnolence (10.2% vs 9.4%), were reported by 36.7% of patients receiving tapentadol and 37.1% of patients receiving oxycodone, respectively. Odds ratios (tapentadol:oxycodone) showed that the incidences of somnolence and dizziness were similar; however, nausea, vomiting, and constipation were significantly less likely with tapentadol IR compared with oxycodone IR. The pattern of withdrawal symptoms suggests that drug tapering may not be necessary after tapentadol IR treatment of this duration. Pain intensity measurements showed similar efficacy for tapentadol and oxycodone.<b>CONCLUSION: </b>During this 90-day study, tapentadol IR was associated with improved gastrointestinal tolerability compared with oxycodone IR while providing similar pain relief. Trial registration information: NCT00364546.

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS® hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: Results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis.

Journal Clinical therapeutics
Year 2007
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 4 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (4 references)

Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release (ER) oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain. METHODS: The study consisted of a 14-day dose-titration and stabilization phase and a 28-day maintenance phase. OROS hydromorphone and ER oxycodone were initiated at dosages of 8 mg QD and 10 mg BID, respectively. Patients maintained diaries in which they rated their pain (from 0 = none to 3 = severe) and pain relief (from 0 = no relief to 4 = complete relief). Noninferiority analyses were conducted on all primary and secondary efficacy variables. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients (71 OROS hydromorphone, 67 ER oxycodone) received treatment (safety population), and 83 (60.1%) completed the study. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in total WOMAC scores at end point, and similar improvements from baseline in the WOMAC physical function, stiffness, and pain scales were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily ER oxycodone provided similar pain relief in these patients with OA of the knee or hip. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Primary study

Unclassified

The ACTION study: a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing once-a-day extended-release morphine sulfate capsules (AVINZA) to twice-a-day controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride tablets (OxyContin) for the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe low back pain.

Journal Journal of opioid management
Year 2007
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 2 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (2 references)

Loading references information
This large, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study compared two oral sustained-release opioids (SROs)--AVINZA (A-MQD), morphine sulfate extended-release capsules given once a day, and OxyContin (O-ER), oxycodone modified-release tablets given twice a day--in SRO-naive subjects ages 30 to 70 with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain. Of the 392 subjects enrolled and randomized, 266 (132 in the A-MQD group and 134 in the O-ER group) completed the opioid dose titration phase and entered an eight-week evaluation phase. During the evaluation phase, A-MQD achieved significantly better pain control than O-ER, as demonstrated by a greater decrease from baseline in pain scores obtained four times daily during weeks one, four, and eight (p = 0.002). The number of breakthrough-pain rescue medication doses adjusted for the number of patient days was significantly lower in the A-MQD group (p < 0.0001). Better pain control with A-MQD was achieved with a significantly lower daily opioid dose than with O-ER (mean 69.9 mg and 91 mg morphine equivalents, respectively; p = 0.0125). Quality of sleep was significantly better with A-MQD for the entire evaluation phase (p = 0.0026). The incidence and severity of elicited opioid side effects were similar in the two groups. This trial demonstrated that once-daily A-MQD provides consistent around-the-clock pain relief in patients with low back pain. In patients who completed opioid dose titration, A-MQD was significantly better than O-ER for reducing pain and improving sleep, while requiring a lower daily opioid dose.

Primary study

Unclassified

Randomized trial comparing polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate to controlled-release oxycodone HCl in moderate to severe nonmalignant pain.

Authors Nicholson B , Ross E , Sasaki J , Weil A
Journal Current medical research and opinion
Year 2006
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 2 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (2 references)

Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety of polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate (P-ERMS) (KADIAN) compared with controlled-release oxycodone HCl (CRO) (OxyContin) in treating chronic, nonmalignant, moderate to severe pain in a community-based outpatient population. DESIGN: Phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N = 112) with chronic, nonmalignant, moderate to severe pain with visual numeric scale (VNS) scores > or = 4 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either P-ERMS once-daily (QD) dosing or CRO twice-daily (BID) dosing for a 24-week treatment period. Upward titration of dose and switching P-ERMS to BID or CRO to thrice-daily (TID) dosing was allowed Weeks 2-24. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life (Physical [PCS] and Mental [MCS] Component Summary scores of the SF-36v2 Health Survey), pain and sleep scores (0-10), and patient and clinician assessments of current therapy (-4 to +4). RESULTS: Patients in both treatment groups experienced significant improvements in PCS scores (P-ERMS, +2.6; CRO, +3.1; p < 0.05 vs. baseline); patients taking CRO also demonstrated improvements in MCS scores (+4.7, p < 0.05 vs. baseline). Both groups attained significant reductions from baseline to 24 weeks in pain (P-ERMS, -2.0; CRO, -1.4; p < or = 0.001 vs. baseline); the reduction with P-ERMS was clinically meaningful (as defined by at least a 2-point reduction in VNS score). Patients attained significant improvement in sleep scores (P-ERMS, -2.6; CRO, -1.6; p < 0.001 vs. baseline; p < 0.05, P-ERMS vs. CRO). At Week 24, both groups indicated significantly increased patient (P-ERMS, +2.6; CRO, +1.7; p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and clinician (P-ERMS, +4.0; CRO, +3.1; p < 0.001 vs. baseline) global assessments of therapy. After 24 weeks, all patients on P-ERMS were dosing within the FDA-approved frequencies (65% QD, 35% BID); 56% of patients on CRO dosed BID, but 38% dosed TID and 6% dosed four times daily (QID). Most common adverse events were constipation, nausea, and somnolence, with no significant difference between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: P-ERMS and CRO both relieved chronic nonmalignant pain in this community-based population; however, patients taking P-ERMS dosed in accordance with FDA-approved frequencies (QD/BID); 44% of those taking CRO dosed more frequently (TID/QID).