Generating matrix of evidence

loading

A unique feature of Epistemonikos is that it connects systematic reviews and their included studies. This allows clustering systematic reviews based on the primary studies they have in common. The concept of 'systematic reviews sharing included studies' is a proxy of 'systematic reviews answering a similar question'.

A matrix of evidence is a tabular way of displaying the cluster of systematic reviews that share included studies, and all the studies included in these reviews. It is automatically created based on the connections of the database, and can be trimmed by the user in order to reflect an accurate body of evidence for a specific question.

This tool allows you to create your own matrix.
It will be saved in your account, and will not be visible to other users

The matrix that will be created from this review contains Systematic reviews / Primary studies. loading

loading See the Matrix as a table (Recommended) See the Matrix as a list of documents (Recommended)

The matrix of evidence is created based on the primary studies that systematic reviews have in common. For this reason it is not possible to generate a matrix of evidence from an empty review (i.e. a review that did not include any study)

This matrix will not be available until Epistemonikos collaborators finish uploading all the relevant information. If you want them to prioritize this review send an email to matrix@epistemonikos.org

Back to review

Loading... loading
19 References (16 Primary studies) Studify 100%Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Kosiborod M2013Pepine CJ1999Wilson SR2009Sendón JL2012Mehta PK2011Bairey Merz CN2016Villano A2013Alexander KP2016Thadani U1994Chaitman BR2004Weisz G2016Babalis D2015Rousseau MF2005Stone PH2006Timmis AD2006Shammas NW2015Chaitman BR2004Tagliamonte E2015Sandhiya S2015
4 Systematic reviews
Banon D2014Belsey J2015Salazar CA2017Savarese G2013
10 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Comparison of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease - a randomized controlled trial.

blocked
Journal Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death around the globe and diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered to be a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalent. Ranolazine, an anti anginal drug has been found to reduce Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetes patients with chronic angina. However the effect of another antianginal drug trimetazidine, on glycemic status is not clear. AIM: To compare the effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with CAD. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus attending Cardiology Out Patient Department (OPD), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India were recruited for this randomized open label parallel arm trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study conducted from January-2012 to April-2013 had 47 eligible patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus. They were randomized to receive either ranolazine 500 mg BD or trimetazidine 35 mg BD for 12 weeks. HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profile, QT and QTc intervals were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Unpaired t-test was used to compare the baseline characteristics of between the groups while comparison within the groups were done using Paired t-test. Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney U-tests were used for non parametric data. Graph pad instat version-3 was used for statistical analysis. Values were expressed as mean ± SD. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study could not find any change in HbA1c levels in both ranolazine and trimetazidine groups. The adverse effects reported from patients on ranolazine include angina, constipation, postural hypotension, headache, dizziness, nausea and weakness while patients on trimetazidine complained of constipation, weakness, palpitations, angina, dizziness, nausea, dyspepsia, headache, gastric discomfort, joint pain, etc. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic angina and diabetes mellitus Ranolazine 500mg BD and Trimetazidine 35mg BD did not show any effect on HbA1c and fasting blood glucose lebel.

Primary study

Unclassified

Effects of Ranolazine on Noninvasive Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Myocardial Ischemia But without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

blocked
Journal Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
Introduction Ranolazine reduces the Na-dependent calcium overload via inhibition of the late sodium current, improving diastolic tone and oxygen handling during myocardial ischemia. In patients with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive coronary artery disease ( CAD), abnormal coronary autoregulation plays a key role. Transthoracic Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve ( CFR) is an index of coronary arterial reactivity and decreases in both microvascular dysfunction and coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ranolazine on CFR in this group of patient. Methods Fifty-eight (39M, 19F) patients with angina and evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD, were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were assigned to ranolazine (29) or placebo (29) for 8 weeks (up to 500 mg twice a day). CFR was determined as the ratio of hyperemic, induced by intravenous dypiridamole administration, to baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity. CFR was assessed before and after 8-week therapy. Results CFR was successfully performed in all patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and CFR between ranolazine and placebo group. After 8 weeks CFR significantly increased in ranolazine group (2.54 ± 0.44 vs. 1.91 ± 0.31; P = 0.005) but not in placebo group (1.99 ± 0.32 vs. 1.94 ± 0.29; P = ns). No patient dropped out during 8 weeks therapy. Side effects were similar in both groups. Conclusions Ranolazine is able to improve CFR in these patients. This is probably due to improvement in abnormal coronary autoregulation, both reducing baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity and increasing hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity.

Primary study

Unclassified

Effects of Ranolazine on Noninvasive Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Myocardial Ischemia But without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

blocked
Journal Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
Introduction Ranolazine reduces the Na-dependent calcium overload via inhibition of the late sodium current, improving diastolic tone and oxygen handling during myocardial ischemia. In patients with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive coronary artery disease ( CAD), abnormal coronary autoregulation plays a key role. Transthoracic Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve ( CFR) is an index of coronary arterial reactivity and decreases in both microvascular dysfunction and coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ranolazine on CFR in this group of patient. Methods Fifty-eight (39M, 19F) patients with angina and evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD, were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were assigned to ranolazine (29) or placebo (29) for 8 weeks (up to 500 mg twice a day). CFR was determined as the ratio of hyperemic, induced by intravenous dypiridamole administration, to baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity. CFR was assessed before and after 8-week therapy. Results CFR was successfully performed in all patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and CFR between ranolazine and placebo group. After 8 weeks CFR significantly increased in ranolazine group (2.54 ± 0.44 vs. 1.91 ± 0.31; P = 0.005) but not in placebo group (1.99 ± 0.32 vs. 1.94 ± 0.29; P = ns). No patient dropped out during 8 weeks therapy. Side effects were similar in both groups. Conclusions Ranolazine is able to improve CFR in these patients. This is probably due to improvement in abnormal coronary autoregulation, both reducing baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity and increasing hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity.

Primary study

Unclassified

A pilot randomized study of ranolazine for reduction of myocardial damage during elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

blocked
Journal American heart journal
Year 2012
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is a new antianginal drug that reduces intracellular sodium and calcium accumulation during ischemia, thus potentially limiting myocardial ischemia. It remains unknown, however, if the drug can play a role in the pathophysiology of periprocedural myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to verify in a randomized study if pretreatment with ranolazine before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has any protective effect on periprocedural myocardial damage. METHODS: Seventy patients with stable angina (age 62 ± 18 years, 42 men) scheduled for elective coronary intervention entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. For 7 days before the procedure, 35 patients were assigned to receive ranolazine (1,000 mg twice daily) and 35 patients had placebo. Creatine kinase-MB and troponin I levels were measured at baseline and at 8 and 24 hours postprocedure. RESULTS: Comparison between the 2 groups did not show any difference in clinical features, extent of coronary artery disease, and technical aspects of PCI. Periprocedural myocardial infarction (ie, postprocedural increase of creatine kinase-MB ≥ 3 times above the upper limit of normal) was less commonly seen after PCI in the ranolazine than in the placebo group (6% vs 22%, P = .041). Detection of markers of myocardial injury above the upper limit of normal was less common [corrected] in the ranolazine vs placebo group: 23% vs 40% for creatine kinase-MB (P = .010) and 31% vs 48% for troponin I (P = .011). [corrected] Postprocedural peak markers levels were also significantly lower in the ranolazine vs placebo group (creatine kinase-MB: 3.1 ± 15.0 and 7.7 ± 19.1 ng/mL, P < .05; troponin I: 0.15 ± 0.35 and 0.47 ± 0.49 ng/mL, P < .05). No significant adverse effect was reported by the 2 groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with ranolazine 1,000 mg twice daily for 7 days significantly reduced procedural myocardial injury in elective PCI.

Primary study

Unclassified

Comparison of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease - a randomized controlled trial.

blocked
Journal Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR
Year 2015
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases have become the leading cause of death around the globe and diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered to be a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalent. Ranolazine, an anti anginal drug has been found to reduce Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diabetes patients with chronic angina. However the effect of another antianginal drug trimetazidine, on glycemic status is not clear. AIM: To compare the effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine on glycemic status in diabetic patients with CAD. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus attending Cardiology Out Patient Department (OPD), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India were recruited for this randomized open label parallel arm trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study conducted from January-2012 to April-2013 had 47 eligible patients diagnosed with CAD and diabetes mellitus. They were randomized to receive either ranolazine 500 mg BD or trimetazidine 35 mg BD for 12 weeks. HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profile, QT and QTc intervals were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Unpaired t-test was used to compare the baseline characteristics of between the groups while comparison within the groups were done using Paired t-test. Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney U-tests were used for non parametric data. Graph pad instat version-3 was used for statistical analysis. Values were expressed as mean ± SD. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study could not find any change in HbA1c levels in both ranolazine and trimetazidine groups. The adverse effects reported from patients on ranolazine include angina, constipation, postural hypotension, headache, dizziness, nausea and weakness while patients on trimetazidine complained of constipation, weakness, palpitations, angina, dizziness, nausea, dyspepsia, headache, gastric discomfort, joint pain, etc. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic angina and diabetes mellitus Ranolazine 500mg BD and Trimetazidine 35mg BD did not show any effect on HbA1c and fasting blood glucose lebel.

Primary study

Unclassified

Assessment of anti-ischemic and antianginal effect at trough plasma concentration and safety of trimetazidine MR 35 mg in patients with stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

blocked
Authors Sellier P , Broustet JP
Journal American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions
Year 2003
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess, at trough plasma concentration, the anti-ischemic and antianginal efficacy and tolerability of trimetazidine modified release (MR) 35 mg taken twice daily by patients with stable angina pectoris. DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study started with a run-in period of 3 weeks with atenolol 50 mg/day and placebo, followed by a 6-month treatment period with once daily atenolol 50 mg and twice daily trimetazidine MR 35 mg or placebo. PATIENTS: The study involved 223 patients with stable angina pectoris (class II or III of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] classification). 180 patients were analyzed in the full analysis set (FAS) following the intention to treat principle (ITT) and 167 patients were analyzed in the per protocol set (PPS). The PPS data are presented here. INTERVENTIONS: Two exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) were performed during the run-in period in order to assess the stability of exercise tolerance before angina pectoris and significant ST segment depression. Efficacy was assessed by a third ETT performed after 8 weeks of treatment, at trough, 12 hours after the intake of the drug. Safety was evaluated over the 6-month duration of the study. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Time to 1 mm ST segment depression. RESULTS: Time to 1 mm ST segment depression was increased by 44 seconds more in the trimetazidine MR 35 mg group than in the placebo group (p = 0.005). A significant difference was also evidenced for the time to onset of angina pectoris (p = 0.049) and for the reason for stopping the exercise (p = 0.02). No difference between groups was found for safety parameters. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the anti-ischemic and antianginal efficacy of trimetazidine MR 35 mg twice daily at trough plasma concentrations in patients with stable angina pectoris receiving atenolol 50 mg/day. Furthermore, the drug is well tolerated over 6 months.

Primary study

Unclassified

Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of propranolol in combination with verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem in exertional angina pectoris: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

blocked
Journal The American journal of cardiology
Year 1985
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
The clinical and hemodynamic effects of propranolol, propranolol-verapamil (P-V), propranolol-nifedipine (P-N) and propranolol-diltiazem (P-D) were studied in 19 patients with chronic exertional angina pectoris. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover study design was used in which patients took each treatment for a 4-week period. The 3 combinations equally reduced the incidence of angina attacks and decreased ST-segment depression. Left ventricular hypokinesia during exercise was lessened and end-systolic volume during exercise decreased with all combinations. Because of a corresponding reduction of normokinetic segmental function, global ejection fraction during exercise remained unchanged. Heart size increased (p less than 0.05) and the PR interval lengthened (p less than 0.001) with P-V and P-D compared to P-N. The largest number of adverse clinical reactions occurred with P-V, whereas the fewest occurred with P-D. Almost all patients preferred combined therapy over propranolol and many favored 1 combination over the others. In summary, when therapy with combined beta- and calcium channel-blocking drugs is planned, P-D should be considered the combination of first choice because of its low incidence of adverse clinical effects. In the presence of possible or definite abnormalities of atrioventricular nodal conduction or decreased left ventricular function, P-N should be considered. Although P-V is associated with frequent adverse reactions, a trial may be warranted if the other combinations are unsuccessful.

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy comparison of trimetazidine with therapeutic alternatives in stable angina pectoris: a network meta-analysis.

Journal Cardiology
Year 2011
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
AIMS: To compare the antianginal efficacy of trimetazidine with that of other agents with no influence on heart rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline and Embase databases were searched for blinded, randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of non-heart-rate-lowering antianginal treatments on exercise tolerance and/or clinical criteria in stable angina patients. All relevant trimetazidine trials including the VASCO trial, the results of which are published herein, were included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis on the summary data was performed. Comparator antianginal agents were considered as a group and in agent/class subgroups. Trials involving β-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and ivabradine were excluded. 218 trials totaling 19,028 patients were included in at least 1 network analysis. Effects of trimetazidine were statistically significant compared with placebo for exercise tolerance and clinical criteria. Transposition of results into seconds for clinical interpretation of exercise tolerance parameters showed a mean improvement of +46 s (95% credibility interval: 28; 66) for total exercise duration, +55 s (35; 77) for 1-mm ST segment depression (T1), and +54 s (24; 84) for time to onset of angina, in favor of trimetazidine. Differences between trimetazidine and active comparators were not significant when exercise tolerance and clinical criteria were analyzed, with +7 s (-12; 28) for total exercise duration, -1 s (-23; 22) for T1, +8 s (-22; 40) for time to onset of angina, and -0.28 (-1.17; 0.64) attacks per week for trimetazidine compared with antianginal agents as a group. CONCLUSIONS: Trimetazidine efficacy was comparable to that of other non-heart-rate-lowering antianginal treatments in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Primary study

Unclassified

Randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of isosorbide dinitrate retard, verapamil sustained-release, and their combination on myocardial ischemic episodes.

blocked
Journal Cardiology
Year 1991
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
The antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) retard 120, verapamil 120 sustained-release (s.r.) and their combination was evaluated in 30 patients with chronic angina pectoris. The study was a randomized, double-blind crossover comparison. The evaluation was determined by exercise testing and 24-hour electrocardiographic ambulatory monitoring. The sum of ST-segment depression at comparable exercise levels was reduced by 37% (p less than 0.001) after verapamil 120 s.r. and by 45% (p less than 0.001) after combination therapy. After ISDN retard 120 the sum of ST-segment depression was also slightly reduced by 18% without attaining statistical significance. Total walking time and time to angina pectoris during treadmill exercise were significantly prolonged after all treatments. The sum of ST-segment depression in the 24-hour Holter ECG was reduced by 46% (p less than 0.001) after verapamil and by 39% (p less than 0.01) after combined therapy. After ISDN retard 120 the mean reduction was 34% (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, the result of the study indicated that ISDN retard 120, verapamil 120 s.r. and a combination of both drugs are effective in reducing the frequency and duration of ischemic episodes in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Primary study

Unclassified

Antianginal efficacy and safety of ivabradine compared with amlodipine in patients with stable effort angina pectoris: a 3-month randomised, double-blind, multicentre, noninferiority trial.

Authors Ruzyllo W , Tendera M , Ford I , Fox KM
Journal Drugs
Year 2007
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current medical therapies for the symptoms of angina pectoris aim to improve oxygen supply and reduce oxygen demand in the myocardium. Not all patients respond to current antianginal monotherapy, or even combination therapy, and a new class of antianginal drug that complements existing therapies would be useful. This study was undertaken to compare the antianginal and anti-ischaemic effects of the novel heart-rate-lowering agent ivabradine and of the calcium channel antagonist amlodipine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a &gt;/=3-month history of chronic, stable effort-induced angina were randomised to receive ivabradine 7.5mg (n = 400) or 10mg (n = 391) twice daily or amlodipine 10mg once daily (n = 404) for a 3-month, double-blind period. Bicycle exercise tolerance tests were performed at baseline and monthly intervals. The primary efficacy criterion was the change from baseline in total exercise duration after 3 months of treatment. Secondary efficacy criteria included changes in time to angina onset and time to 1mm ST-segment depression, rate-pressure product at trough drug activity, as well as short-acting nitrate use and anginal attack frequency (as recorded in patient diaries). RESULTS: At 3 months, total exercise duration was improved by 27.6 +/- 91.7, 21.7 +/- 94.5 and 31.2 +/- 92.0 seconds with ivabradine 7.5 and 10mg and amlodipine, respectively, both ivabradine groups were comparable to amlodipine (p-value for noninferiority &lt; 0.001). Similar results were observed for time to angina onset and time to 1mm ST-segment depression. Heart rate decreased significantly by 11-13 beats/min at rest and by 12-15 beats/min at peak of exercise with ivabradine but not amlodipine, and rate-pressure product decreased more with ivabradine than amlodipine (p-value vs amlodipine &lt;0.001, at rest and at peak of exercise). Anginal attack frequency and short-acting nitrate use decreased substantially in all treatment groups with no significant difference between treatment groups. The most frequent adverse events were visual symptoms and sinus bradycardia with ivabradine (0.8% and 0.4% withdrawals, respectively) and peripheral oedema with amlodipine (1.5% withdrawals). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable angina, ivabradine has comparable efficacy to amlodipine in improving exercise tolerance, a superior effect on the reduction of rate-pressure product (a surrogate marker of myocardial oxygen consumption) and similar safety.
References ( articles) loading Revert Studify
References ( articles) loading Revert Studify