Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
This article has no abstract
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Date Presented 05/04/19 The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of yoga on stress and anxiety levels within the OT college student population compared to a matched control group performing physical exercise alone. Findings supported the use of yoga as a stress-reduction tool. This research aligns with previously reported literature stating that yoga has a positive impact in reducing stress levels and suggests that academic programs implement scheduled stress management curricula for students. Primary Author and Speaker: BrieLynn Sturm Additional Authors and Speakers: Melinda Cozzolino Contributing Authors: Sebastian Harenberg
Primary study
Unclassified
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review
Introduction: Improvements in motor function following interventions incorporating botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) remain controversial, with existing studies yielding contrasting results.1-3 The mechanisms underlying BTX-A remote central effects are still under investigation. It is hypothesized that the toxin administration strategy may play a role in producing such differing outcomes. We tested a strategy based on modulating muscle synergies. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical and remote central effects of an occupational therapy intervention combined with adjunctive BTX-A compared to the same occupational therapy without the adjuvant application of the toxin. Methods: A two-group, parallel, pre-post, randomized controlled trial was performed. The clinical effects of occupational therapy when performed following BTX-A injections to disinhibit finger flexors (n=5) was compared to those of an equal dose of occupational therapy alone (n=6). Motor dexterity and function were assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Scale, Motor Index, Arm Activity Measure, 9-Hole Peg Test, and Box and Block Test, and differences were analysed using ANCOVA. Brain activity was examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and between-group differences were analysed using contrast statistical parametric mapping. Results: Both groups started in statistically similar conditions. Both treatments provided significant clinical improvements compared to baseline. The total differences in change score on the Fugl-Meyer Scale and Motor Index were larger, though not significantly, in the toxin-treated group than in the control group (Figure). When the toxin is administered, activity in the brain is more localised and appears more in the right hemisphere in subjects in the toxin-treated group and more in the left in those in the control group. Conclusions: Functional improvements were observed in the toxin-treated group, but the effect size compared to the control group was too small to provide definitive results. Post-treatment contrast analysis of the fMRI scans suggests that the toxin reduces cortical and cerebellar overexcitation. Findings are limited by the small cohort size. Funding: FOE received Mexican Research Council CONACYT CB-2014-01-237251. Keywords: Neurorehabilitation; Botulinum toxin; fMRI; Stroke [Formula presented] References 1. Demetrios M, Khan F, Turner-Stokes L, Brand C, McSweeney S. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;(6):CD009689. 2. Shaw L, Rodgers H, Price C, et al; BoTULS Investigators. Bo
Primary study
Unclassified
This article is not included in any systematic review