Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. Rivaroxaban was approved in 2012 for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but no prior studies have been reported specifically evaluating the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Under a Quality Assessment Initiative (QAI), we established a Clinical Pathway to guide rivaroxaban use for CAT and now report a validation analysis of our first 200 patients. A 200 patient cohort with CAT (PE or symptomatic, proximal DVT), whose full course of anticoagulation was with rivaroxaban, were accrued. In competing risk analysis, primary endpoints at 6 months included new or recurrent PE or symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT, major bleeding, clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban, or death. In competing risk analysis, the 6 months cumulative incidence of new or recurrent VTE was 4.4 % (95 % CI = 1.4-7.4 %), major bleeding was 2.2 % (95 % CI = 0-4.2 %) and all-cause mortality 17.6 % (95 % CI = 11.7-23.0 %). In this cohort of 200 patients with active cancer and CAT the rates of new or recurrent VTE and major bleeding were comparable to the cancer subgroup analysis from the EINSTEIN studies. The results of our Clinical Pathway provide guidance on Rivaroxaban use for treatment of CAT, and suggest that safety and efficacy is preserved, compared with past-published experience with LMWH.
PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban-a direct oral anticoagulant-use in patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 400 patients with active cancer and associated VTE, defined as deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. This single-center study was carried out from January 2012 to June 2015. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety, using the incidence of recurrent symptomatic VTE and major bleeding, respectively, throughout the treatment with rivaroxaban.
RESULTS: Of the 400 patients enrolled, 223 (55.8%) were female. A total of 362 (90.5%) patients had solid tumors and 244 (61%) had metastatic disease. A total of 302 (75.5%) received initial parenteral therapy with enoxaparin (median: 3, mean: 5.6, standard deviation [SD]: 6.4 days) followed by rivaroxaban. Ninety-eight patients (24.5%) were treated with on label rivaroxaban treatment. Recurrence rates were 3.25% with major bleeding occurring in 5.5% during the anticoagulant therapy (median: 118, mean: 163.9, SD: 159.9 days).
CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban can be an attractive alternative for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.
INTRODUCTION: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a common acquired thrombophilia associated with a high thrombotic risk, in which vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent the mainstay of therapy. Case series involving up to 35 patients with APS suggested limited efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the prospective case series we followed 56 consecutive patients with APS (44 women and 12 men, aged from 22 to 64years), including 33 (60%) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 16 (28.6%) with triple APS who were treated with DOACs due to their preferences or unstable anticoagulation with VKA. DOACs were started at least 3months since the thromboembolic event in patients with D-dimer below 500ng/ml.
RESULTS: Forty-nine (87.5%) patients were treated with rivaroxaban, 4 (7.3%) with dabigatran and 3 (5.4%) with apixaban. During follow-up of 2 to 43 (mean 22) months, 6 (10.7%, 5.8 per 100 patient-years) patients (4 women and 2 men, 4 with triple positive APS) experienced recurrent thrombosis, including deep vein thrombosis (n=4, including 2 episodes preceded by nonadherence), superficial vein thrombosis (n=1) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (n=1). The recurrence rate of VTE on DOACs was 5.8 per 100 patient-years. Two patients (3.6%) experienced severe bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This case-series suggests that DOACs are safe in patients with APS. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies.
The current treatment for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) with thrombotic manifestation is long-term anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are usually the agents of choice. However, VKA limitations, such as unpredictable anticoagulation effects due to interaction with diet and other drugs, require regular monitoring. This may impact on patients' quality of life. Since the approval of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation and deep vein thrombosis prevention, much has been speculated about its use in APS patients. We report here a series of eight APS patients with failure of thrombotic prevention during rivaroxaban use. All patients had venous thrombosis as the initial manifestation of APS, and two of them also had arterial manifestations. Three patients had triple antibody positivity. Five patients developed arterial events during the treatment with rivaroxaban. Until the results of ongoing trials of rivaroxaban for APS are presented, NOAC should not be recommended to APS patients. Our preliminary experience as well cases previously reported in the literature suggest that there is a high-risk group that is less protected with rivaroxaban, namely those with previous arterial thrombosis or triple positivity. VKA remains to be the mainstay treatment for thrombotic APS.
BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is established for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, but whether it is useful in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is uncertain.
METHODS: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial, done in two UK hospitals, included patients with antiphospholipid syndrome who were taking warfarin for previous venous thromboembolism, with a target international normalised ratio of 2·5. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue with warfarin or receive 20 mg oral rivaroxaban daily. Randomisation was done centrally, stratified by centre and patient type (with vs without systemic lupus erythematosus). The primary outcome was percentage change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) from randomisation to day 42, with non-inferiority set at less than 20% difference from warfarin in mean percentage change. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Other thrombin generation parameters, thrombosis, and bleeding were also assessed. Treatment effect was measured as the ratio of rivaroxaban to warfarin for thrombin generation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN68222801.
FINDINGS: Of 116 patients randomised between June 5, 2013, and Nov 11, 2014, 54 who received rivaroxaban and 56 who received warfarin were assessed. At day 42, ETP was higher in the rivaroxaban than in the warfarin group (geometric mean 1086 nmol/L per min, 95% CI 957-1233 vs 548, 484-621, treatment effect 2·0, 95% CI 1·7-2·4, p<0·0001). Peak thrombin generation was lower in the rivaroxaban group (56 nmol/L, 95% CI 47-66 vs 86 nmol/L, 72-102, treatment effect 0·6, 95% CI 0·5-0·8, p=0·0006). No thrombosis or major bleeding were seen. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients in each group.
INTERPRETATION: ETP for rivaroxaban did not reach the non-inferiority threshold, but as there was no increase in thrombotic risk compared with standard-intensity warfarin, this drug could be an effective and safe alternative in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and previous venous thromboembolism.
FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK, Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, LUPUS UK, Bayer, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.
AIM: The aim of this study was to describe a case series of patients with primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical charts of eight patients with thrombotic primary or secondary APS treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) between January 2012 and May 2015 were reviewed.
RESULTS: The mean age was 45 ± 14.36 (range 27-69 years). Four patients had secondary APS (50%). All patients were initially treated with warfarin by a mean time of 70.87 ± 57.32 months (range 17-153 months). Changes in anticoagulation were defined by recurring thrombosis in five patients (62.5%) and life-threatening bleeding in the other three cases. Seven patients (87.5%) received rivaroxaban treatment and one patient (12.5%) apixaban. The mean follow-up period with DOACs was 19 ± 10.06 months (range 2-36 months). There was no recurrence of thrombosis by the time of data collection.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite not being the standard treatment in APS, we propose DOACs as a rational alternative for the management of patients with this diagnosis. Further interventional clinical studies are necessary for possible standardization of this therapy in APS patients.
The efficacy and safety of dabigatran for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) were demonstrated in two trials. It is unclear if the results pertain to patients with cancer and VTE. Data from two randomised trials comparing dabigatran and warfarin for acute VTE were pooled. Primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent VTE and related death from randomisation to the end of the treatment period. Safety outcomes were major, major and clinically relevant non-major, and any bleeding during the oral-only treatment period. Patients with active cancer (=within 5 years) at baseline or diagnosed during the study were analysed. Compared with 4,772 patients without cancer, recurrent VTE occurred more frequently in 335 patients with cancer at any time (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.3) and more often in 114 with cancer diagnosed during the study compared to 221 with cancer at baseline (HR 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.1-6.2). There was no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran and warfarin for cancer at baseline (HR 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.20-2.8) or diagnosed during the study (HR 0.63; 95 % CI, 0.20-2.0). Major bleeding (HR 4.1; 95 % CI, 2.2-7.5) and any bleeding (HR 1.5; 95 % CI, 1.2-2.0) were more frequent in patients with cancer than without, but with similar incidence in cancer with dabigatran or warfarin. In conclusion, in cancer patients, dabigatran provided similar clinical benefit as warfarin. VTE recurrence or bleeding were similar in patients on dabigatran or warfarin. The efficacy of dabigatran has not been assessed in comparison with low-molecular-weight heparin.
Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. Rivaroxaban was approved in 2012 for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but no prior studies have been reported specifically evaluating the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Under a Quality Assessment Initiative (QAI), we established a Clinical Pathway to guide rivaroxaban use for CAT and now report a validation analysis of our first 200 patients. A 200 patient cohort with CAT (PE or symptomatic, proximal DVT), whose full course of anticoagulation was with rivaroxaban, were accrued. In competing risk analysis, primary endpoints at 6 months included new or recurrent PE or symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT, major bleeding, clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban, or death. In competing risk analysis, the 6 months cumulative incidence of new or recurrent VTE was 4.4 % (95 % CI = 1.4-7.4 %), major bleeding was 2.2 % (95 % CI = 0-4.2 %) and all-cause mortality 17.6 % (95 % CI = 11.7-23.0 %). In this cohort of 200 patients with active cancer and CAT the rates of new or recurrent VTE and major bleeding were comparable to the cancer subgroup analysis from the EINSTEIN studies. The results of our Clinical Pathway provide guidance on Rivaroxaban use for treatment of CAT, and suggest that safety and efficacy is preserved, compared with past-published experience with LMWH.
