Validation of the menstrual pictogram in women with leiomyomata associated with heavy menstrual bleeding.

Non ancora tradotto Non ancora tradotto
Autori
Categoria Primary study
GiornaleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
Year 2013

Questo articolo fa parte di 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference)

This article is part of the following publication threads:
Loading references information

OBJECTIVE:

The menstrual pictogram (MP), a semiquantitative, easy-to-use tool to assess blood loss, was validated against the reference standard of alkaline hematin (AH) quantitation using data pooled from 3 clinical trials.

METHODS:

Premenopausal women aged ≥18 years with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with uterine leiomyomata were randomized to asoprisnil (10 or 25 mg) or placebo. Patients completed the MP and collected feminine hygiene products for assessment of blood loss by the AH method. Agreement between the MP and the AH method was calculated.

RESULTS:

The positive predictive value of the MP total to distinguish women with HMB against the AH total was 91%. The agreement (κ-statistic) between AH and MP totals for classifying patients with ≥50% or <50% decreases in HMB was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.98), and the MP was 96% sensitive and 92% specific. The methods showed good association for percentage change in blood (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of 0.86, 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) but not for actual blood loss per cycle (ICC of 0.64, [95% CI, 0.55-0.71]); the greatest underestimation occurred for severely stained napkins.

CONCLUSION:

In this study, the MP distinguished women with HMB and adequately assessed improvements with therapy.
Epistemonikos ID: ad5813960477f3b2c3998fbcd9ec20aedfd773b2
First added on: May 07, 2020