In a prior randomized controlled study, patients treated with ulipristal acetate (UPA) or placebo for 3 months had a decrease in leiomyoma size. A total of 10 patients' tissue samples (5 placebo and 5 treated with 10 mg/d UPA) that underwent hysterectomy and tissue preservation were identified from this study. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were used to assess fold gene and protein expression of extracellular membrane (ECM) proteins: collagen 1A (COL1A), fibronectin (FN1), and versican (VCAN) of the samples. Confirmatory immunohistochemical analysis was performed. Changes in total matrix collagen were examined using Masson trichrome staining. Multiplex measurement of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases was performed. Compared to placebo-treated surgical specimens, 80% of the treated specimens showed decrease in VCAN protein, 60% showed decrease in FN1, but no consistent alteration in COL1A. This effect was also supported by immunohistochemistry where leiomyoma surgical specimens demonstrated decreased amount of FN1 and VCAN on UPA treatment. Increased MMP2 and decreased MMP9 in treated patient leiomyomas indicate both degradation of the matrix and inhibition of the pathway involved in matrix production. Treatment with UPA decreased fibroid volume in placebo-controlled, randomized trials. Treatment with UPA decreased gene expression and protein production in leiomyoma tissue, suggesting both an impact on water content and ECM protein concentration as a mechanism of ulipristal-mediated decrease in leiomyoma size.
OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and tolerability of ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone receptor modulator, for treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) with abnormal uterine bleeding, one or more discrete leiomyomas, and uterine size 20 weeks of gestation or less. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 5 mg ulipristal, 10 mg ulipristal, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks followed by 12-week drug-free follow-up. Coprimary endpoints were rate of and time to amenorrhea, defined as no bleeding for the last 35 consecutive days of treatment. Secondary endpoints included rates of amenorrhea from day 11 and change from baseline to endpoint in the Revised Activities subscale of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, which includes questions pertaining to physical and social activities. Safety assessments included adverse event monitoring and endometrial biopsies. A sample size of 150 was planned to compare separately each dose of ulipristal with placebo.
RESULTS: From March 2014 to March 2016, 157 patients were randomized. Demographics were similar across treatment groups. Amenorrhea was achieved by 25 of 53 (47.2% [97.5% CI 31.6-63.2]) and 28 of 48 (58.3% [97.5% CI 41.2-74.1]) patients treated with 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal, respectively, compared with 1 of 56 (1.8% [97.5% CI 0.0-10.9]) placebo-treated patients (both P<.001). Time to amenorrhea was shorter for both ulipristal doses compared with placebo (P<.001), and both doses of ulipristal resulted in improved quality of life compared with placebo (P<.001). Common adverse events (5% or greater in either ulipristal group during treatment) were hypertension, elevated blood creatinine phosphokinase, and hot flushes. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients, but none was considered related to treatment. Endometrial biopsies were benign.
CONCLUSION: Ulipristal at 5 mg and 10 mg were well tolerated and superior to placebo in rate of and time to amenorrhea in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02147197.
OBJECTIVE:To assess the efficacy and tolerability of ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone receptor modulator, for treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.METHODS:This phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial randomized premenopausal women (18-50 years) with uterine leiomyomas and abnormal uterine bleeding to once-daily 5 mg ulipristal, 10 mg ulipristal, or placebo in two 12-week treatment courses separated by a drug-free interval of two menses. Coprimary end points were rates of and time to amenorrhea during course 1. Change from baseline to end of course 1 in the Revised Activities subscale of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire was a secondary end point. A sample size of 400 was planned to compare separately each ulipristal dose with placebo.RESULTS:From January 2014 through November 2016, 432 women were randomized. Demographic characteristics were similar across treatment groups. In course 1, 68 of 162 (42.0% [97.5% CI 33.3-51.1]) and 86 of 157 (54.8% [97.5% CI 45.5-63.8]) patients treated with 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal, respectively, compared with 0 of 113 (0.0% [97.5% CI 0.0-3.8]) patients treated with placebo achieved amenorrhea (P<.001 for each dose); most women who achieved amenorrhea did so within 10 days (time to amenorrhea, P<.001 for each dose). Significantly greater improvements in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Revised Activities subscale scores were reported with 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal compared with placebo (least squares mean change from baseline: 48.3, 56.7, and 13.0, respectively; P<.001 for each dose). Both ulipristal doses were well tolerated; in course 1, hot flush occurred in 7.5%, 11.6%, and 1.7% of patients treated with 5 mg ulipristal, 10 mg ulipristal, and placebo, respectively.CONCLUSION:Treatment with 5 mg or 10 mg ulipristal was superior to placebo in achieving amenorrhea and generally well tolerated for the medical management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical experience of laparoscopic/robotic myomectomy in premenopausal patients pretreated with ulipristal acetate (UPA) with women not hormonally pretreated.
DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of laparoscopic/robotic myomectomy procedure videos (Canadian Task Force Classification III).
SETTING: Multiple university-affiliated tertiary care hospitals.
PATIENTS: Fifty-five premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopic/robotic myomectomy for intramural myomas and were either pretreated with 3 months of UPA or had no hormonal pretreatment.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic/robotic myomectomy surgical videos were independently reviewed by 2 gynecologists blinded to whether or not patients received pretreatment with UPA. Each procedure was scored using a novel 22-point surgical global rating tool containing 6 subscales: depth of myometrial incision, ease of myoma-myometrium cleavage plane identification, ease of myoma detachment, blood loss during myoma detachment, myometrial blood loss after myoma detachment, and myoma consistency.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participating surgeons submitted 55 videos of laparoscopic/robotic myomectomy procedures recorded over a 3-year period (2012-2015). Fifty met the inclusion criteria (25 UPA-treated patients and 25 patients without hormonal pretreatment). Patients treated with UPA were more likely to be older than patients with no medical pretreatment (mean age = 33.5 vs 38.3 years, p = .002). There were no statistically significant differences regarding other baseline characteristics such as the largest diameter of myoma removed, the number of myomas removed, or the estimated blood loss. There was no difference in the physician assessors' mean global rating score for patients with UPA pretreatment versus no pretreatment (12.4 vs 13.4, p = .23). Within the 6 subscales, no differences were observed between the 2 groups. Each video was graded independently by 2 assessors, and there was high inter-rater agreement for the total score and each subscale.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in surgical experience for myomectomies of patients pretreated with UPA versus those without medical pretreatment.
STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact of administration of the selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM), ulipristal acetate (UPA) on the endometrium of women with fibroids?
SUMMARY ANSWER: UPA administration altered expression of sex-steroid receptors and progesterone-regulated genes and was associated with low levels of glandular and stromal cell proliferation.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Administration of all SPRM class members results in PAEC (progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes). Data on the impact of the SPRM UPA administration on endometrial sex-steroid receptor expression, progesterone (P)-regulated genes and cell proliferation are currently lacking.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: Observational study with histological and molecular analyses to delineate impact of treatment with UPA on endometrium. Endometrial samples (n = 9) were collected at hysterectomy from women aged 39 to 49 with uterine fibroids treated with UPA (oral 5 mg daily) for 9-12 weeks. Control proliferative (n = 9) and secretory (n = 9) endometrium from women aged 38-52 with fibroids were derived from institutional tissue archives.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Study setting was a University Research Institute. Endometrial biopsies were collected with institutional ethical approval and written informed consent. Concentrations of mRNAs encoded by steroid receptors, P-regulated genes and factors in decidualised endometrium were quantified with qRT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry was employed for localization of progesterone (PR, PRB), androgen (AR), estrogen (ERα) receptors and expression of FOXO1, HAND2, HOXA10, PTEN homologue. Endometrial glandular and stromal cell proliferation was objectively quantified using Ki67.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: UPA induced morphological changes in endometrial tissue consistent with PAEC. A striking change in expression patterns of PR and AR was detected compared with either proliferative or secretory phase samples. There were significant changes in pattern of expression of mRNAs encoded by IGFBP-1, FOXO1, IL-15, HAND2, IHH and HOXA10 compared with secretory phase samples consistent with low agonist activity in endometrium. Expression of mRNA encoded by FOXM1, a transcription factor implicated in cell cycle progression, was low in UPA-treated samples. Cell proliferation (Ki67 positive nuclei) was lower in samples from women treated with UPA compared with those in the proliferative phase.
LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: A small number of well-characterized patients were studied in-depth. The impacts on morphology, molecular and cellular changes with SPRM, UPA administration on symptom control remains to be determined.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: P plays a pivotal role in endometrial function. P-action is mediated through interaction with the PR. These data provide support for onward development of the SPRM class of compounds as effective long-term medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): H.O.D.C. received has clinical research support for laboratory consumables and staff from Bayer Pharma Ag and provides consultancy advice (no personal remuneration) for Bayer Pharma Ag, PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, Vifor Pharma UK Ltd, AbbVie Inc.; A.R.W.W. has received consultancy payments from Bayer, Gedeon Richter, Preglem SA, HRA Pharma; L.H.R.W., A.A.M., R.M., G.S. and P.T.K.S. have no conflicts of interest. Study funded in part from each of: Medical Research Council (G1002033; G1100356/1; MR/N022556/1); National Health Institute for Health Research (12/206/520) and TENOVUS Scotland.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy is used before myomectomy to decrease the size of the fibroids, but its association with fibroid recurrence postoperatively remains unsettled. We undertook a retrospective study of robotic-assisted myomectomy (RM) patients at our academic medical center to determine symptomatic recurrence and reoperation rates in those who did versus did not receive preoperative GnRH therapy. Only patients, who had their index myomectomy at least 2 years prior to the chart review, were included in this study. Of 118 RM patients identified between January 2005 and December 2009, 17 patients (14.4 %) had symptomatic recurrence as early as 5 months to as late as 30 months postoperatively. The symptomatic recurrence group had significantly higher preoperative GnRH use (35 vs 9 % non-recurrence; p = 0.009). A total of 7.6 % of all patients underwent reoperation. GnRH agonist use was significantly higher in the reoperation group (56 vs 9 % no reoperation; p = 0.002). Cavity entry during the initial surgery was also more frequent in the reoperation group (56 vs 20 %; p = 0.030), whereas the presence of multiple fibroids, size of the largest leiomyoma, and uterine volume were not statistically different between groups. Our study is among the earliest to report RM reoperation rates in patients receiving preoperative GnRH therapy, showing that the role of GnRH agonist therapy to shrink myomas may not be beneficial when measured against risk of disease recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of 3-month treatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) before laparoscopic myomectomy of large uterine myomas.
STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database included women of reproductive age requiring laparoscopic myomectomy with the following characteristics: FIGO type 3, 4 or 5 myomas; largest diameter of the main myoma ≥10cm; number of myomas ≤3; largest diameters of the other myomas ≤5cm (second myoma) and ≤3cm (third myoma). Patients either underwent direct surgery (group S) or were treated before surgery with UPA for 3 months (group UPA).
RESULTS: The mean (±SD) intraoperative blood loss was lower in group UPA (507.1±214.9ml) than in group S (684.2±316.8; p=0.012). The total operative time was lower in group UPA (137.6±26.8min) than in group S (159.7±26.8min; p<0.001); there was no significant difference in the suturing time between the two study groups (p=0.076). Hemoglobin drop was lower in group UPA (1.1±0.5g/dl) than in group S (1.3±0.7g/dl; p=0.034). Six patients in group S and no patient in group UPA required postoperative blood transfusions (p=0.031). Complications were not different between the two groups (p=0.726). Moreover, preoperative treatment with UPA caused a significant increase in hemoglobin levels (11.9±1.6g/dl) compared with baseline (9.1±1.1g/dl; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: A 3-month treatment with UPA before laparoscopy for large uterine myomas decreases intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop, postoperative blood transfusion and length of surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Ulipristal acetate (UPA) 30 mg is safe and effective for emergency contraception (EC). This prospective open-label exploratory study was conducted to obtain additional data on the pharmacodynamic effects of repeated dose of UPA 30 mg during an 8-week period (effects on ovulation inhibition, hormonal levels, endometrium and cervical mucus). Safety and tolerability data of repeated use of UPA EC were also collected.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 23 healthy female, healthy sterilized women participated in two substudies receiving UPA for 8 consecutive weeks. In substudy 1, UPA 30 mg was administered every 7 days (Q7D n=12); while in substudy 2, every 5 days (Q5D n=11). Subjects were monitored three times a week in a baseline cycle and during treatment with transvaginal ultrasounds, hormonal measurements and cervical mucus evaluation. Laboratory safety measurements and standard surrogate thrombosis risk markers were measured at baseline and within a few days of the last tablet. A luteal phase endometrial biopsy was taken in the baseline cycle and posttreatment.
RESULTS: A total of 11/12 (91.7%) and 8/11 (72.7%) of the subjects ovulated at least once in substudy Q7D and Q5D, respectively, with similar, normal hormonal profiles. No effect on cervical mucus was observed. All biopsies were classified as benign in both substudies; 5/11 biopsies on Q5D posttreatment were classified as nonphysiological with some of typical progesterone receptor modulator-associated endometrial changes. UPA was well tolerated in both treatment arms while clinical laboratory results and surrogate thrombosis markers were reassuring.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat use of 30 mg oral UPA every 5 or 7 days for 8 weeks initially delays follicular rupture but ovulation eventually occurs with time in most subjects. Safety data indicate that UPA 30 mg could be safely administered if needed more than once for EC in a given menstrual cycle.
IMPLICATIONS: These data demonstrate that repeated use of UPA 30 mg is safe. However, ovulation eventually occurs in a high proportion of women in spite of repeated treatments in both studied regimens. Nevertheless, since the stage of follicular development of women seeking initial or repeat EC use is generally unknown, the repeated use of UPA may still delay follicular rupture and prevent an unintended pregnancy in the event of further unprotected intercourse.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated 12-week courses of 5 or 10 mg daily ulipristal acetate for intermittent treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids.
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized administration of four 12-week courses of ulipristal acetate.
SETTING: Gynecology centers.
PATIENT(S): Four hundred fifty-one subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroid(s) and heavy menstrual bleeding.
INTERVENTION(S): Four repeated 12-week treatment courses of daily 5 or 10 mg ulipristal acetate.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometrial safety and general safety, laboratory parameters, amenorrhea, controlled bleeding, fibroid volume, quality of life (QoL), and pain.
RESULT(S): Efficacy results, such as bleeding control and fibroid volume reduction, were in line with previously published data. Pain and QoL showed marked improvements from screening, even during the off-treatment intervals. The safety profile of ulipristal acetate was confirmed, and repeated treatment courses did not increase the occurrence of adverse reactions. There were no significant changes in laboratory parameters during the study. The percentage of subjects with endometrial thickness ≥ 16 mm was 7.4% (all subjects) after the first treatment course and returned to below screening levels (4.9%) in subsequent treatment courses. As in previous studies, ulipristal acetate did not increase the occurrence of endometrial features of concern. The frequency of nonphysiological changes did not increase with repeated treatment. They were observed in 17.8% and 13.3% of biopsies after treatment courses 2 and 4, respectively, and were reversible after treatment cessation.
CONCLUSION(S): The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy and further support the safety profile of repeated intermittent treatment of symptomatic fibroids with ulipristal acetate.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01629563.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the hysteroscopic findings in women on treatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) and to define the most common hysteroscopic patterns related to the treatment and compare them with the histologic findings.
DESIGN: Preliminary study.
SETTING: OB-GYN and Gynecology Oncology Clinic, Military Medical Institute, Ministry of Defense, Warsaw, Poland, and Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, University of Bari, Italy.
PATIENTS: Seventy-four premenopausal patients complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding due to uterine myomas and on treatment with UPA 5 mg/day for at least 30 days.
INTERVENTIONS: Women received transvaginal sonography (TVS) and then office hysteroscopy and visually guided endometrial biopsies. Video hysteroscopies were recorded in digital format. Pictures were evaluated by 2 authors off-line and compared with histologic results.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hysteroscopic aspects and classification of progesterone receptor modulator-associated endometrial changes were measured. The most common hysteroscopic finding was the combination of a flat subtle epithelium with small glandular openings; large isolated or confluent cysts in the stroma, giving the surface a floating aspect at fluid distention; and well-evident subendometrial vascular network with a "chicken-wire" vascular pattern (44.6%). This finding accounted for 82% of cases with endometrial thickness > 10 mm at TVS. Histology confirmed a combination of epithelial secretory (vacuoles) and hypotrophic effects (small and dilated glands), whereas at stromal level the combination of cysts, dense stroma, and vascular wall thickening was found. At 3 months follow-up echographic, hysteroscopic, and histologic endometrial patterns were normal in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In most women on UPA and with thickened endometrium at TVS, the hysteroscopy showed benign and characteristics aspects related to the ambivalent effects of UPA on progesterone receptor. These alterations took place just after 1 month of treatment but disappeared within 3 months of stopping treatment.
In a prior randomized controlled study, patients treated with ulipristal acetate (UPA) or placebo for 3 months had a decrease in leiomyoma size. A total of 10 patients' tissue samples (5 placebo and 5 treated with 10 mg/d UPA) that underwent hysterectomy and tissue preservation were identified from this study. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were used to assess fold gene and protein expression of extracellular membrane (ECM) proteins: collagen 1A (COL1A), fibronectin (FN1), and versican (VCAN) of the samples. Confirmatory immunohistochemical analysis was performed. Changes in total matrix collagen were examined using Masson trichrome staining. Multiplex measurement of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases was performed. Compared to placebo-treated surgical specimens, 80% of the treated specimens showed decrease in VCAN protein, 60% showed decrease in FN1, but no consistent alteration in COL1A. This effect was also supported by immunohistochemistry where leiomyoma surgical specimens demonstrated decreased amount of FN1 and VCAN on UPA treatment. Increased MMP2 and decreased MMP9 in treated patient leiomyomas indicate both degradation of the matrix and inhibition of the pathway involved in matrix production. Treatment with UPA decreased fibroid volume in placebo-controlled, randomized trials. Treatment with UPA decreased gene expression and protein production in leiomyoma tissue, suggesting both an impact on water content and ECM protein concentration as a mechanism of ulipristal-mediated decrease in leiomyoma size.
Struttura dello studio»Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
