Drug eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in large coronary artery revascularization; systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES:

We aim to determine if drug eluting stents (DES) are better than bare-metal stents (BMS) in large coronary artery (diameter ≥ 3 mm) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND:

DES have become the standard of care for PCI in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the superiority of DES over BMS in large vessel CAD is not clear and previous studies have shown conflicting results.

METHODS:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of PCI with BMS and DES for large vessel CAD were identified from the year 2000 to August 2019. The outcomes were studied individually and included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis. Aggregated odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS:

Eight RCTs were included (4 with data for second-generation DES and 5 had data on first-generation trials). Compared to BMS, second generation DES had a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality (2.4% vs. 3.9%, OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98, P 0.04), TLR (3.5% vs. 8.6% OR 0.38 95% CI 0.28-0.53, P < 0.001), and MI (2.1% vs. 2.9% OR 0.73 95% CI 0.53-1.0, P 0.05). The difference in all-cause mortality was not seen with first-generation DES.

CONCLUSION:

Newer DES are associated with a lower mortality, TLR, and MI and thus should be preferred over BMS for large coronary artery PCI.