Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
8 articles (8 References) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 JAMA
Year 2015
Loading references information
<b>Importance: </b>In patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, treatment failure is associated with excessive inflammatory response and worse outcomes. Corticosteroids may modulate cytokine release in these patients, but the benefit of this adjunctive therapy remains controversial.<b>OBJECTIVE: </b>To assess the effect of corticosteroids in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high associated inflammatory response.<b>Design, Setting, and Participants: </b>Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 3 Spanish teaching hospitals involving patients with both severe community-acquired pneumonia and a high inflammatory response, which was defined as a level of C-reactive protein greater than 150 mg/L at admission. Patients were recruited and followed up from June 2004 through February 2012.<b>INTERVENTIONS: </b>Patients were randomized to receive either an intravenous bolus of 0.5 mg/kg per 12 hours of methylprednisolone (n = 61) or placebo (n = 59) for 5 days started within 36 hours of hospital admission.<b>Main Outcomes and Measures: </b>The primary outcome was treatment failure (composite outcome of early treatment failure defined as [1] clinical deterioration indicated by development of shock, [2] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [3] death within 72 hours of treatment; or composite outcome of late treatment failure defined as [1] radiographic progression, [2] persistence of severe respiratory failure, [3] development of shock, [4] need for invasive mechanical ventilation not present at baseline, or [5] death between 72 hours and 120 hours after treatment initiation; or both early and late treatment failure). In-hospital mortality was a secondary outcome and adverse events were assessed.<b>RESULTS: </b>There was less treatment failure among patients from the methylprednisolone group (8 patients [13%]) compared with the placebo group (18 patients [31%]) (P = .02), with a difference between groups of 18% (95% CI, 3% to 32%). Corticosteroid treatment reduced the risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87]; P = .02). In-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (6 patients [10%] in the methylprednisolone group vs 9 patients [15%] in the placebo group; P = .37); the difference between groups was 5% (95% CI, -6% to 17%). Hyperglycemia occurred in 11 patients (18%) in the methylprednisolone group and in 7 patients (12%) in the placebo group (P = .34).<b>Conclusions and Relevance: </b>Among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high initial inflammatory response, the acute use of methylprednisolone compared with placebo decreased treatment failure. If replicated, these findings would support the use of corticosteroids as adjunctive treatment in this clinical population.<b>Trial Registration: </b>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00908713.

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
<b>BACKGROUND: </b>Clinical trials yielded conflicting data about the benefit of adding systemic corticosteroids for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. We assessed whether short-term corticosteroid treatment reduces time to clinical stability in patients admitted to hospital for community-acquired pneumonia.<b>METHODS: </b>In this double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with community-acquired pneumonia from seven tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland within 24 h of presentation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either prednisone 50 mg daily for 7 days or placebo. The computer-generated randomisation was done with variable block sizes of four to six and stratified by study centre. The primary endpoint was time to clinical stability defined as time (days) until stable vital signs for at least 24 h, and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00973154.<b>FINDINGS: </b>From Dec 1, 2009, to May 21, 2014, of 2911 patients assessed for eligibility, 785 patients were randomly assigned to either the prednisone group (n=392) or the placebo group (n=393). Median time to clinical stability was shorter in the prednisone group (3·0 days, IQR 2·5-3·4) than in the placebo group (4·4 days, 4·0-5·0; hazard ratio [HR] 1·33, 95% CI 1·15-1·50, p&lt;0·0001). Pneumonia-associated complications until day 30 did not differ between groups (11 [3%] in the prednisone group and 22 [6%] in the placebo group; odds ratio [OR] 0·49 [95% CI 0·23-1·02]; p=0·056). The prednisone group had a higher incidence of in-hospital hyperglycaemia needing insulin treatment (76 [19%] vs 43 [11%]; OR 1·96, 95% CI 1·31-2·93, p=0·0010). Other adverse events compatible with corticosteroid use were rare and similar in both groups.<b>INTERPRETATION: </b>Prednisone treatment for 7 days in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to hospital shortens time to clinical stability without an increase in complications. This finding is relevant from a patient perspective and an important determinant of hospital costs and efficiency.<b>Funding: </b>Swiss National Science Foundation, Viollier AG, Nora van Meeuwen Haefliger Stiftung, Julia und Gottfried Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The European respiratory journal
Year 2014
Loading references information
Recommendation of the use of systemic steroids in chronic obstructive disease (COPD) exacerbation rely on trials that excluded patients requiring ventilatory support. In an open-label, randomised evaluation of oral prednisone administration, 217 patients with acute COPD exacerbation requiring ventilatory support were randomised (with stratification on the type of ventilation) to usual care (n=106) or to receive a daily dose of prednisone (1 mg·kg(-1)) for up to 10 days (n=111). There was no difference regarding the primary end-point, intensive care unit mortality, which was 17 (15.3%) deaths versus 15 (14%) deaths in the steroid-treated and control groups, respectively (relative risk 1.08, 95% CI 0.6-2.05). Analysis according to ventilation modalities showed similar mortality rates. Noninvasive ventilation failed in 15.7% and 12.7% (relative risk 1.25, 95% CI 0.56-2.8; p=0.59), respectively. Both study groups had similar median mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit length of stay, which were 6 (interquartile range 6-12) days versus 6 (3.8-12) days and 9 (6-14) days versus 8 (6-14) days, respectively. Hyperglycaemic episodes requiring initiation or alteration of current insulin doses occurred in 55 (49.5%) patients versus 35 (33%) patients in the prednisone and control groups, respectively (relative risk 1.5, 95% CI 1.08-2.08; p=0.015). Prednisone did not improve intensive care unit mortality or patient-centred outcomes in the selected subgroup of COPD patients with severe exacerbation but significantly increased the risk of hyperglycaemia.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Archives of internal medicine
Year 2011
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials assessing the effect of systemic corticosteroids on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations excluded patients who were mechanically ventilated or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Critically ill patients constitute a population of persons who are prone to develop complications that are potentially associated with the use of corticosteroids (eg, infections, hyperglycemia, ICU-acquired paresis) that could prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation and even increase mortality. METHODS: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic corticosteroid treatment in patients with an exacerbation of COPD who were receiving ventilatory support (invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation). A total of 354 adult patients who were admitted to the ICUs of 8 hospitals in 4 countries from July 2005 through July 2009 were screened, and 83 were randomized to receive intravenous methylprednisolone (0.5 mg/kg every 6 hours for 72 hours, 0.5 mg/kg every 12 hours on days 4 through 6, and 0.5 mg/kg/d on days 7 through 10) or placebo. The main outcome measures were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and need for intubation in patients treated with noninvasive mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in demographics, severity of illness, reasons for COPD exacerbation, gas exchange variables, and corticosteroid rescue treatment. Corticosteroid treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the median duration of mechanical ventilation (3 days vs 4 days; P = .04), a trend toward a shorter median length of ICU stay (6 days vs 7 days; P = .09), and significant reduction in the rate of NIV failure (0% vs 37%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Systemic corticosteroid therapy in patients with COPD exacerbations requiring mechanical ventilation is associated with a significant increase in the success of noninvasive mechanical ventilation and a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01281748.

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
背景:是否添加抗生素治疗的利益与社区获得性肺炎在重症监护病房的病人谁是皮质类固醇是不清楚。我们的目的是评估除了地塞米松长度留在这个组中,这可能会导致早期肺炎决议通过抑制全身炎症的影响。 方法:在我们的双盲,安慰剂对照试验中,我们随机分配18岁的成年人或确诊为社区获得性肺炎向在荷兰的两个教学医院紧急部门接受静脉注射地塞米松(5毫克,每天一次以上例)或安慰剂4天从入院。如果他们的免疫功能低下患者均不合格,需要立即转移到重症监护病房,或已接受皮质类固醇或免疫抑制药物。我们随机分配患者一到一个治疗组的基础上同一个电脑随机分配序列的20块。主要成果是所有患者的住院时间。这项研究是注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT00471640数量。 调查结果:2007年11月和2010年九月间,我们招收304例,随机分配153安慰剂组和151个地塞米松组。 143(47%)的304参加试验的患者不得不性肺炎的严重性指数类4-5(79 [52%]在的地塞米松组和64 [42%]控件的中的患者)的性肺炎。逗留的平均长度为7.5天,而安慰剂组(5.3 -11·5)(95%CI中位数的差异相比,6.5天,地塞米松组(IQR为5.0 -9·0) 0-2天,P = 0.0480)。在医院的死亡率和严重不良事件罕见和利率并没有不同群体之间,虽然67地塞米松组151例(44%),高血糖35 153控制(23%)(P <0.0001)相比。 释义:添加非免疫功能低下患者社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗时,地塞米松可以减少住院时间。 资金:没有。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Year 2010
Loading references information
理由:一些研究表明,有益的影响糖皮质激素在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的患者,可能通过减少局部及全身抗炎宿主反应。 目的:为了评估辅助泼尼松龙与CAP患者住院治疗的疗效。 方法:住院的病人,临床和放射学诊断标准的临床和放射学标准,使用与第7天或安慰剂随机接受40 mg泼尼松龙,随着抗生素。主要结果是第7天临床治愈。次要终点是在第30天,住院天数,临床稳定,退热,和C-反应蛋白的临床治愈。疾病的严重程度得分CURB-65(严重程度指数为社区获得性肺炎的评估混乱,血中尿素氮,呼吸频率,血压,年龄65岁或65岁以上)和肺炎严重程度指数。 测量和主要结果:纳入213例患者。五十四例(25.4%),有一个CURB-65评分大于2,和93例(43.7%),肺炎严重程度指数类IV-V。在7天和30天的临床治愈率为84/104(80.8%)和69/104(66.3%),泼尼松龙组和93/109(85.3%)和84/109(77.1%),安慰剂组(P = 0.38,P = 0.08)。与安慰剂组相比,患者对强的松龙有更快的退热和血清C-反应蛋白水平下降较快。亚组分析重症肺炎患者的临床结果并没有显示出差异。逾期未能更常见(> 72 h后入场),泼尼松龙组(20例,19.2%)比安慰剂组(10例,6.4%,P = 0.04)。不良事件的发生数和两组之间没有什么不同。 结论:强的松(40毫克),每日一次,一个星期没有改善的结果,在住院的CAP患者。一个好处,更严重的疾病患者不能被排除在外。由于其增加了的后期失败和缺乏疗效泼尼松龙与不应该被推荐作为常规辅助治疗CAP。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Year 2002
Loading references information
雾化吸入布地奈德已成功地用于治疗急性哮喘发作,我们推测,它也可能是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性发作有效。在这个多中心,双盲,随机,安慰剂对照试验,雾化吸入布地奈德(普米克令舒/ Nebuamp),口服类固醇,和安慰剂的疗效进行了比较,在199例慢性阻塞性肺病,需要住院治疗的急性发作。患者接受随机H(0)72小时(H(72)),布地奈德2毫克每6小时(N = 71),30毫克口服强的松每12小时(N = 62),或安慰剂( N = 66)。所有接受标准治疗,包括雾化测试(2)激动剂,异丙托溴铵​​,口服抗生素,并补充氧气。支气管扩张剂后FEV(1)平均变化(95%置信区间)从H(0)到H(72)积极的治疗比安慰剂:布地奈德与安慰剂相比,0.10升(0.02至0.18升);类固醇与安慰剂,0.16升(0.08至0.24升)。在FEV布地奈德和泼尼松龙(1)之间的差异并不显着,-0.06升(-0.14至0.02升)。严重不良事件的发生,是为各组相似。布地奈德系统性红斑狼疮活动少,比强的松发病率较高的高血糖的观察与强的松表示。布地奈德和泼尼松改善气流在慢性阻塞性肺病患者急性发作时,与安慰剂相比。雾化吸入布地奈德可能替代口服类固醇,在治疗慢性阻塞性肺病,但进一步的研究nonacidotic加重应做评估后首次发作的慢性阻塞性肺病加重其长期临床疗效的影响。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The New England journal of medicine
Year 1999
Loading references information
背景和方法:虽然其临床疗效目前还不清楚,他们可能会造成严重的不利影响,全身糖皮质激素对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性发作住院的患者的标准治疗。我们除了其他疗法进行全身糖皮质激素的一项双盲,随机试验(两个或八周)或安慰剂,慢性阻塞性肺病加重。其他大多数的照顾是在为期六个月的后续标准。主要终点是治疗失败定义为死亡,任何原因或需要插管和机械通气,慢性阻塞性肺病入院到医院,或加强药物治疗。结果:1840年25退伍军人事务医疗中心的潜力的研究参与者,271人参加并入选; 80收到糖皮质激素治疗8周的课程中,80例接受为期两周的课程,111接受安慰剂。大约一半的潜在参与者,没有资格,因为他们在过去30天里收到的全身糖皮质激素。治疗失败的的率分别为显着在安慰剂组更高的的比在在30天内的工作(33主场迎战百分之23%,磷= 0.04),并在90天内的工作(48主场迎战百分之37%,磷= 0.04)相结合的的两个糖皮质激素群体中。全身糖皮质激素(联合组)与较短的住院时间(8.5天,与安慰剂组,P = 0.03 9.7天)和1被迫在一秒钟呼气量是在高于每升约0.10入学后的第一天,安慰剂组。显着的治疗优势不再明显,在六个月。八个星期的治疗方案是不优于为期两个星期的治疗方案。接受糖皮质激素治疗的患者更可能比那些接受安​​慰剂(15%比4%,P = 0.002),有高血糖,需要治疗。结论:与全身糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺病急性发作住院的患者中的临床疗效温和的改善结果。获得最大的好处是在头两个星期的治疗。足够的严重性手令治疗高血糖是最常见的并发症。