系統性回顧 related to this topic

loading
23 References (0 articles) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Year 2019
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is associated with deficient intravascular production of prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and excessive production of thromboxane, a vasoconstrictor and stimulant of platelet aggregation. These observations led to the hypotheses that antiplatelet agents, low-dose aspirin in particular, might prevent or delay development of pre-eclampsia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and dipyridamole, when given to women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (30 March 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies. We updated the search in September 2019 and added the results to the awaiting classification section of the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials comparing antiplatelet agents with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent were included. Studies only published in abstract format were eligible for inclusion if sufficient information was available. We would have included cluster-randomised trials in the analyses along with individually-randomised trials, if any had been identified in our search strategy. Quasi-random studies were excluded. Participants were pregnant women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Interventions were administration of an antiplatelet agent (such as low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole), comparisons were either placebo or no antiplatelet. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For this update we incorporated individual participant data (IPD) from trials with this available, alongside aggregate data (AD) from trials where it was not, in order to enable reliable subgroup analyses and inclusion of two key new outcomes. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-seven trials (40,249 women, and their babies) were included, although three trials (relating to 233 women) did not contribute data to the meta-analysis. Nine of the trials contributing data were large (> 1000 women recruited), accounting for 80% of women recruited. Although the trials took place in a wide range of countries, all of the nine large trials involved only women in high-income and/or upper middle-income countries. IPD were available for 36 trials (34,514 women), including all but one of the large trials. Low-dose aspirin alone was the intervention in all the large trials, and most trials overall. Dose in the large trials was 50 mg (1 trial, 1106 women), 60 mg (5 trials, 22,322 women), 75mg (1 trial, 3697 women) 100 mg (1 trial, 3294 women) and 150 mg (1 trial, 1776 women). Most studies were either low risk of bias or unclear risk of bias; and the large trials were all low risk of bas. Antiplatelet agents versus placebo/no treatment The use of antiplatelet agents reduced the risk of proteinuric pre-eclampsia by 18% (36,716 women, 60 trials, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88; high-quality evidence), number needed to treat for one women to benefit (NNTB) 61 (95% CI 45 to 92). There was a small (9%) reduction in the RR for preterm birth <37 weeks (35,212 women, 47 trials; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95, high-quality evidence), NNTB 61 (95% CI 42 to 114), and a 14% reduction infetal deaths, neonatal deaths or death before hospital discharge (35,391 babies, 52 trials; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95; high-quality evidence), NNTB 197 (95% CI 115 to 681). Antiplatelet agents slightly reduced the risk of small-for-gestational age babies (35,761 babies, 50 trials; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; high-quality evidence), NNTB 146 (95% CI 90 to 386), and pregnancies with serious adverse outcome (a composite outcome including maternal death, baby death, pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational age, and preterm birth) (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96; 17,382 women; 13 trials, high-quality evidence), NNTB 54 (95% CI 34 to 132). Antiplatelet agents probably slightly increase postpartum haemorrhage > 500 mL (23,769 women, 19 trials; RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; moderate-quality evidence due to clinical heterogeneity), and they probably marginally increase the risk of placental abruption, although for this outcome the evidence was downgraded due to a wide confidence interval including the possibility of no effect (30,775 women; 29 trials; RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54; moderate-quality evidence). Data from two large trials which assessed children at aged 18 months (including results from over 5000 children), did not identify clear differences in development between the two groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Administering low-dose aspirin to pregnant women led to small-to-moderate benefits, including reductions in pre-eclampsia (16 fewer per 1000 women treated), preterm birth (16 fewer per 1000 treated), the baby being born small-for-gestational age (seven fewer per 1000 treated) and fetal or neonatal death (five fewer per 1000 treated). Overall, administering antiplatelet agents to 1000 women led to 20 fewer pregnancies with serious adverse outcomes. The quality of evidence for all these outcomes was high. Aspirin probably slightly increased the risk of postpartum haemorrhage of more than 500 mL, however, the quality of evidence for this outcome was downgraded to moderate, due to concerns of clinical heterogeneity in measurements of blood loss. Antiplatelet agents probably marginally increase placental abruption, but the quality of the evidence was downgraded to moderate due to low event numbers and thus wide 95% CI. Overall, antiplatelet agents improved outcomes, and at these doses appear to be safe. Identifying women who are most likely to respond to low-dose aspirin would improve targeting of treatment. As almost all the women in this review were recruited to the trials after 12 weeks' gestation, it is unclear whether starting treatment before 12 weeks' would have additional benefits without any increase in adverse effects. While there was some indication that higher doses of aspirin would be more effective, further studies would be warranted to examine this.

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Year 2018
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Impaired placentation in the first 16 weeks of pregnancy is associated with increased risk of subsequent development of preeclampsia, birth of small for gestational age neonates and placental abruption. Previous studies reported that prophylactic use of aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia and small for gestational age neonates with no significant effect on placental abruption. However, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining the effect of aspirin in relation to gestational age at onset of therapy and dose of the drug reported that significant reduction in the risk of preeclampsia and small for gestational age neonates is achieved only if the onset of treatment is at ≤16 weeks of gestation and the daily dose of the drug is ≥100 mg. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of aspirin on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage, in relation to gestational age at onset of therapy and the dose of the drug. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the prophylactic effect of aspirin during pregnancy using PubMed, Cinhal, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library from 1985 to September 2017. Relative risks (RR) of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random effect models. Analyses were stratified according to daily dose of aspirin (<100 and ≥100 mg) and the gestational age at the onset of therapy (≤16 and >16 weeks) and compared using subgroup difference analysis. RESULTS: The entry criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies on a combined total of 12,585 participants. Aspirin at a dose of <100 mg per day had no impact on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage, irrespective of whether it was initiated at ≤16 weeks' gestation (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.36) or at >16 weeks (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.39). At ≥100 mg per day, aspirin was not associated with a significant change on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage, whether the treatment was initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.26), or at >16 weeks (RR 2.08 95% CI 0.86 to 5.06), but the difference between the subgroups was significant (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Aspirin at a daily dose of ≥100 mg for prevention of preeclampsia, initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation rather than >16 weeks may decrease the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage.

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Obstetrics and gynecology
Year 2017
Loading references information
引言:本研究的目的是总结和描述当代非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者铂基辅助化疗随机试验的生存数据。目的是帮助临床医生为NSCLC手术切除后考虑辅助化疗的患者提供更好的生存估计。方法:采用顺铂辅助化疗法切除NSCLC进行随机试验。 1年,2年,5年,7年和10年的生存率和以下百分位数(情景):第90(最差情况),第75(较低典型值),中位数,第25(上位典型值)和第10(最佳情况)总体生存(OS)曲线。结果:分析了19项试验(7042例)的38例OS曲线。辅助化疗,1年中位OS率(四分位数范围)为91%(85-95),2年为73%(69-88岁),5年为61%(45-65岁),7年为49岁%(38-65)。仅观察,1年中位OS率(四分位数范围)为88%(83-92),2年为74%(65-82岁),5年为55%(42-58岁),7岁为40岁%(34-45)。在两军间,2,5和7年的生存率通过将1年生存率分别提高到2,5和7倍的能力来估计。少数试验报道10年的存活率。结论:简单百分比及其功能为NSCLC手术后辅助化疗患者的生存评估和描述提供了有用的起点。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Year 2017
Loading references information
背景:决策辅助工具在提高健康决策质量方面已经取得了全面成功。然而,目前还不清楚使用决策辅助工具的结果对老年人(65岁以上)的影响。我们试图系统地审查随机对照试验(RCT)和临床对照试验(CCT),评估决策辅助的功效与常规护理或替代干预(面临治疗,筛查或护理决定的老年人)相比。方法:系统搜索(1)Cochrane评估决策辅助和(2)MEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO,Cochrane图书馆中心注册研究和Cinahl。我们包括已发表的RCTs / CCTs旨在改善老年人(65岁以上)和RCTs / CCT的共同决策(SDM)的干预措施,分析干预对平均年龄65+以上亚组的影响。基于国际患者决策援助标准(IPDAS),主要结果是决策和决策过程的属性。其他行为,健康和卫生系统效应被认为是次要结果。如果可以汇集数据,则进行荟萃分析。定量分析了荟萃分析不可能的数据。结果:搜索策略产生了11,034个参考。抽象和全文筛选后,共收录了22篇论文。决策辅助工具比对照组更好。通过增加老年人的知识和准确的风险感知(决策属性)来平常的护理干预。在决策过程属性方面,决策辅助导致决策冲突较低,患者参与程度更高。结论:本次评论显示,老年人决策辅助的有效性取得了有希望的成果。决策帮助改善老年人的知识,增加风险感知力,减少决策冲突,并似乎加强对SDM的参与。然而,必须指出的是,关于老年人决策辅助工具的有效性的文献正处于起步阶段。专门为老年人开发了一项决策援助,大多数研究中的平均年龄在65岁到70岁之间,表明最老年龄不包括在内。未来的研究应该扩大对老年人,弱势成年人的决策辅助设计,应用和评估。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Year 2017
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: The optimum time for commencing antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of preeclampsia and its complications is unclear. Aggregate data meta-analyses suggest that aspirin is more effective if given prior to 16 weeks' gestation, but data are limited because of an inability to place women in the correct gestational age subgroup from relevant trials.OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to use the large existing individual participant data set from the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies Collaboration to assess whether the treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications vary based on whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation.STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of individual participant data including 32,217 women and 32,819 babies recruited to 31 randomized trials comparing low-dose aspirin or other antiplatelet agents with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of preeclampsia has been published previously. Using this existing data set, we performed a prespecified subgroup analysis based on gestation at randomization to antiplatelet agents before 16 weeks, compared with at or after 16 weeks, for 4 of the main outcomes prespecified in the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies protocol: preeclampsia, death of baby, preterm birth before 34 weeks, and small-for-gestational-age baby. Individual participant data for the subgroups were combined in a meta-analysis using RevMan software. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. The χ2 test for interaction was used to assess statistically significant (P < .05) differences in treatment effect between subgroups.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for women randomized before 16 weeks' gestation compared with those randomized at or after 16 weeks for any of the 4 prespecified outcomes: preeclampsia, relative risk, 0.90, (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.03; 17 trials, 9241 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.98; 22 trials, 21,429 women) for ≥16 weeks (interaction test, P = .98); death of baby, relative risk, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.09; 15 trials, 8626 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.07; 21 trials, 22,336 women) for ≥16 weeks (interaction test, P = .80); preterm birth prior to 34 weeks, relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.04; 19 trials, 9155 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.00; 25 trials, 22,117 women) for ≥16 weeks (interaction test, P = .91); and small-for-gestational-age baby, relative risk, 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.94; 13 trials, 6393 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.08; 18 trials, 14,996 women) for ≥16 weeks (interaction test, P = .08).CONCLUSION: The effect of low-dose aspirin and other antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications is consistent, regardless of whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation. Women at an increased risk of preeclampsia should be offered antiplatelet therapy, regardless of whether they are first seen before or after 16 weeks' gestation.

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Gan J , He H , Qi H
期刊 Hypertension in pregnancy
Year 2016
Loading references information
本文讨论了生物伦理学领域定性研究方法的特点和应用。对拉美国家发表的文章进行了系统评价,并从SciELO数据库中选出,特别强调了采用定性研究方法的文章。这组文章揭示了由三个不同的向量组成的生物伦理学领域。第一个是指可以被定义为社会运动或纪律的生物伦理学的双重特征;第二个区别于其他伦理学领域的生物伦理学,特别是主要是基于道义的职业道德;第三部分与研究中进行的分析采用的伦理方法有关。这些文本中相对微不足道的部分来源于定性研究,根据其主题和指导方针可分为四类:生物伦理学作为领域和/或话语;健康训练;伦理,护理和临床实践;制定卫生政策。另一方面,生产显示了社会科学研究人员对生物伦理​​学的相对怯懦的态度,另一方面在实地研究中几乎没有使用定性方法,在某些情况下,一定缺乏准确性关于使用方法。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Year 2016
Loading references information
目的:与精神分裂症中抗精神病药相关的体重增加一直在关注。该荟萃分析通过系统地搜索和分析随机对照试验(RCT)来检查金刚烷胺作为精神分裂症体重增加的辅助治疗的功效和安全性。在成人精神分裂症患者中比较辅助性金刚烷胺与安慰剂的RCT被纳入荟萃分析。方法:两名独立调查人员对文献进行了检索,并提取了数据。计算了平均差异(WMD / SMD)和风险比±95%置信区间。结果:五项RCT(n = 265)双盲设计持续8.2±5.9周,包括在分析中。金刚烷胺优于安慰剂,减轻中度效果(试验3; n = 205; WMD -2.22kg; P = 0.001,I 2 = 45%)。金刚烷胺在阴性症状(阳性和阴性综合征量表[PANSS] [1试验]和负面症状评估量表[1试验])评分(试验2; n = 84; SMD, -0.26; P = 0.01,I²= 12%),但PANSS总评分(试验2)(SMD,-0.31; P = 0.16,I²= 0%)和阳性症状(PANSS [1试验]和积极症状评估量表[1次试验])得分(SMD,0.13; P = 0.54,I²= 0%)。除了失眠(P = 0.007;需要伤害的数字,6; 95%置信区间,4-16),全因停药(风险比,1.12; P = 0.54,I²= 0%)和其他不良事件相似金刚烷胺和安慰剂组之间。结论:根据5项RCT的Meta分析,辅助性金刚烷胺似乎是减轻精神分裂症患者抗精神病相关体重增加的有效选择。需要更多的RCT来通知临床建议。 (PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2017 APA,保留所有权利)

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Year 2015
Loading references information
大约2%的新生儿在常规产后检查中有心脏杂音。我们的目标是研究目前在新生儿无症状心脏杂音的管理中的证据和实践。我们对英国(英国)的所有新生儿单位进行了系统的文献综述和电话调查。对文献的系统评价并不支持术中新生儿无症状性心脏杂音的四肢血压(BP),胸部X线片(CXR)和心电图(ECG)的常规实践。该调查有来自英国193个新生儿单位中132人(68%)的参与。在无症状术语新生儿心脏杂音中,124例(94%)单位进行脉搏血氧饱和度测量,100单位(76%)测量四肢血压,36单位(27%)进行CXR,52单位(39%)进行心电图。八十六个单位(65%)可以提供主要由特殊护理单位心脏病学家和新生儿重症监护病房新生儿专家的儿科医生提供的内部超声心动图仪。目前在新生儿无症状心脏杂音的治疗实践中存在很大差异。没有证据支持常规使用四肢BP,CXR和ECG来评估新生儿无症状性心脏杂音。根据现有证据,结论临床检查(包括确定双侧股骨头脉搏的存在和质量)和脉搏血氧饱和度的普遍使用在识别无症状期新生儿出院心脏杂音前的CHD是最重要的。

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Xu TT , Zhou F , Deng CY , Huang GQ , Li JK , Wang XD
期刊 Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)
Year 2015
Loading references information
背景教育被认为对可持续发展至关重要,而且是“世界人权宣言”第26条所述的基本人权。近年来,为了改善低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的教育机会,已经作出了重大的努力,而且取得了重大进展,这是不平衡的,而且仍然存在挑战。作为对教育对国际发展的重要性的回应,拟议的系统审查将确定,评估和分析过去二十年来对LMIC的教育干预进行的所有影响评估的结果,旨在改善学校的获取和质量。研究目标正如议定书作者所说:“这次审查的主要目的是确定,评估和综合关于教育干预措施对中低收入国家儿童获得教育和学习机会的影响的证据。我们还将通过纳入分组分析来评估教育干预措施如何影响参与者的不同分组,并且还将包括更广泛的证据来解决与过程,实施和成本效益有关的问题。“方法学研究将包括测量使用实验和准实验研究设计的干预措施的影响。为了解决与过程,实施和成本有关的审查问题,将包括研究将作为第二阶段的依据,以确定和包括定性研究,项目文件,过程评估和其他补充数据,以便影响评估审查的方案包括在内。广义上讲,如果旨在提高小学和中学教育的获取和/或质量,将包括干预措施,针对中低收入国家的小学和中学学龄儿童,如世界银行。干预类别包括基于学校的保健方案,学校供餐方案,向儿童和家庭提供关于退休教育,奖学金,减免或消除退学金,现金转移,教师培训,教师奖励和问责制,学校管理,学校选择,社区的信息监督和问责制,材料提供,教育学,新学校和基础设施。包括的研究必须评估以下主要兴趣结果之一:入学率,出勤率,辍学率,学习成绩,完成率,教师出勤率,教师出勤率或教师表现。

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Wang X , Bai T , Liu S , Pan H , Wang B
期刊 PloS one
Year 2014
Loading references information
目的:为了评估先兆子痫的风险和两个栓症基因的单核苷酸多态性(SNP),该因子V G1691A SNP和凝血酶原G20210A SNP之间的关系。 日期来源:英语语言文学到2012年十一月系统的搜索使用Medline和文摘进行。检索词包括“先兆子痫”,“血栓形成”,“因子V Leiden”,“凝血酶原基因20210,”和他们的组合。 结果(S):30个研究,5048子痫前期患者和6796控件被列入荟萃分析。我们发现,凝血酶原G20210A多态性与所有先兆子痫的风险增加有关(合并比值比(OR)= 1.81,95%置信区间(CI)1.25-2.63),重度子痫前期(合并OR = 3.02,95%CI为2.06 -4.45)。同时,合并OR因子V莱顿和所有先兆子痫的关系为1.60(95%CI 1.28-2.00)和2.45(95%CI 1.63-3.69),重度子痫前期的案件。 结论(S):这个荟萃分析支持了V因子G1691A SNP和凝血酶原G20210A SNP与风险增加先兆子痫都全面和重度子痫前期有关。