Primary studies included in this broad synthesis

loading
18 articles (24 References) Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 JAMA pediatrics
Year 2014
Loading references information
IMPORTANCE: Antimicrobial treatment reduces the symptoms of acute otitis media (AOM). The effect of antimicrobial treatment on the duration of middle ear effusion (MEE) and concomitant hearing impairment is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the antimicrobial treatment of AOM reduces the duration of MEE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved a total of 84 children with AOM between 6 months and 15 years of age. Participants were recruited from September 14, 1999, to January 4, 2000; October 10, 2005, to December 16, 2005; and September 22, 2009, to June 4, 2012, from among children attending an AOM prevention trial and children visiting local outpatient clinics in Oulu, Finland. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly allocated to receive either 40 mg/kg of amoxicillin-clavulanate or a placebo mixture per day for 7 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the time to the disappearance of MEE as defined by a normal tympanogram finding (A curve) from both ears on 2 consecutive measurement days. Parents performed daily tympanometry at home. The study physician performed tympanometry and otoscopy at study entry, after 3 and 7 days, and then weekly until both ears were healthy. The main secondary outcome measures were the time to normal otoscopy findings and the proportion of children without persistent MEE at 14 days and 2 months. RESULTS: Middle ear effusion disappeared 2.0 weeks (13.7 days) earlier (P = .02) in the antimicrobial group (mean time, 2.7 weeks; 95% CI, 1.7-3.7) than in the placebo group (4.7 weeks; 95% CI, 3.6-5.7). Normal otoscopy findings were observed 1.4 weeks sooner in the antimicrobial group than in the placebo group (P = .02). On day 14, 69% of children in the antimicrobial group and 38% in the placebo group had normal tympanometry findings (number needed to treat, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0-10.5). On day 60, 2 children (5%) in the antimicrobial group and 10 children (24%) in the placebo group had persistent MEE (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Antimicrobial treatment effectively reduced the duration of MEE and possible concomitant hearing impairment in children with AOM. Antimicrobial treatment also reduced the risk for persistent MEE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01244581.

Publication Thread

Hoberman and Paradise (provisional publication thread name)

This thread includes 2 references

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The New England journal of medicine
Year 2011
Loading references information
背景:抗菌药物治疗儿童急性中耳炎的疗效仍有争议。 方法:在这项随机,双盲试验,孩子年龄在6至35个月的使用严格的标准,确诊为急性中耳炎,阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸(161名儿童)或安慰剂(158名儿童)为7天。主要成果是从第8天,直到治疗结束访问首次剂量治疗失败时间。治疗失败的定义是基于孩子(包括不良事件)和急性中耳炎的耳镜迹象的整体状况。 结果:治疗失败发生在谁的孩子接受阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸的18.6%,有44.9%的孩子接受安慰剂(P <0.001)相比。在计划安排的首次访华(第3天)组之间的差异就已经很明显,此时谁的孩子接受阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸的13.7%相比,那些接受安​​慰剂25.3%,治疗失败。总体而言,阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸治疗失败的进展减少62%(危险比为0.38; 95%信心区间[CI],0.25〜0.59,P <0.001),需要进行抢救治疗了81%(6.8%对比33.5%,风险比为0.19,95%CI,0.10〜0.36,P <0.001)。镇痛药或解热剂阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸和安慰剂组的儿童为84.2%和85.9%,分别。阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸组比安慰剂组显着较常见的不良事件。共阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸组中47.8%的孩子有腹泻,湿疹较安慰剂组26.6%(P <0.001); 8.7%和3.2%的孩子在各组(P = 0.04 )。 结论:儿童急性中耳炎受益于抗菌药物治疗与安慰剂相比,虽然他们有更多的副作用。未来的研究应确定谁的病人可能获得最大的利益,以尽量减少不必要的抗菌药物治疗和细菌耐药性的发展。(儿科研究基金会和其他资助; ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT00299455)。

Publication Thread

Bezáková and Damoiseaux (provisional publication thread name)

This thread includes 2 references

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Scandinavian journal of primary health care
Year 2007
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical recovery from acute otitis media (AOM) in children, 2-16 years of age, managed with or without treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin (PcV). DESIGN: An open, prospective randomized trial. Children aged between 2 and 16 years, presenting with one- or double-sided AOM (without perforation) with symptom duration of less than four days, were included. The children were randomized to PcV for five days or to no primary antibiotic treatment. A health score and compliance were registered on a daily basis for seven days. SETTING: A total of 32 health centres and 72 GPs in south-east Sweden. Subjects. Children aged 2-16 presenting with earache. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recovery time, symptom duration, frequency of complications (up to three months) and consumption of healthcare services independent of treatment with or without antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients carried out the trial; 92 were randomized to PcV, 87 to no primary antibiotic treatment. The median recovery time was four days in both groups. Patients who received PcV had less pain (p <0.001) and used fewer analgesics. There were no significant differences in the number of middle-ear effusions or perforations at the final control after three months. Children randomized to PcV treatment consulted less (p <0.001) during the first seven days. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation supports that PcV treatment of AOM does not affect the recovery time or complication rates. PcV provided some symptomatic benefit in the treatment of AOM in otherwise healthy children, aged 2-16 years.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
Year 2006
Loading references information
背景:急性中耳炎(AOM),是最常见的诊断为儿童处方抗生素。评估抗生素,与父母的要求不填写处方,除非孩子要么是没有更好的或者是在48小时之差,一个“等待和观望处方”(黄蜂)过去的研究已经排除了严重急性中耳炎的儿童。在急诊室进行了这些试验中没有。目的:若要确定AOM的的治疗使用一个的WASP是否显着降低了抗生素的使用,相比,与一个“标准的处方”(SP)的,,和,以评估上的临床症状和与到抗生素的使用有关的不良结局的的的的此介入方式的影响。设计,设置,和的患者:一个,2004年,于今年七月至12日和2005年7月11日,日进行的的的随机对照试用。岁的6个月至在一个紧急部门见过的的12个年与AOM的的儿童被随机分配,以收到无论是的WASP,或一个SP。所有患者收到为使用在家里的布洛芬和滴耳的的镇痛滴的。蒙蔽组分配,研究助理,进行结构性的电话采访,4至6个,11至14日,入学后30天至40天,以确定结果。主要观察措施:作者:的抗生素的处方和临床的当然灌装。结果:总体而言,283的病患被随机分派要么到的的WASP组组(n = 138号)或的SP组组(n = 145)。实质上更多的家长在WASP组没有填写的抗生素处方(62%比13%,P <0.001)。有是之间没有的群体统计学上显着的的的在的作者:随后的的出现发烧,耳痛,或不定期的为的医疗照顾连进网站的造访的的频率中的区别。内的的WASP组的,既发烧(相对危险度度[RR],2.95; 95%置信区间[CI],1.75 - 4.99; P <0.001)和耳痛(RR,1.62; 95%CI,1.26 - 2.03,P < 0.001)是相关联的与灌装的处方的。结论:黄蜂的做法大大减少不必要的抗生素使用和可能替代常规使用抗菌素治疗这类儿童在急诊室看到AOM的儿童。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00250900。

Publication Thread

This thread includes 2 references

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
目的:抗生素治疗急性中耳炎(AOM)的广泛使用已经导致多药耐药病原体的出现,是难以治疗的。然而,它已被证明与非严重急性中耳炎的儿童最不于ABX恢复。本研究的目的是评估安全性,有效性,可接受性,和一个非于ABX干预与非严重急性中耳炎的儿童的费用。 通过使用一种新的AOM的严重性筛选指标筛选方法:6个月至12岁儿童与AOM。非严重急性中耳炎患儿家长接受了教育干预,和他们的孩子是随机接受要么立即使用抗生素。(ABX;阿莫西林,加上症状的药物)或观察等待(二战;症状的药物)。被蒙蔽的调查,而不是父母,学籍。主要成果包括母公司与AOM的护理,症状决议,AOM的失败/复发,鼻咽部肺炎链球菌的耐药株,以于ABX满意。二次结果药物相关的不良事件,严重不良事件,意料之外的AOM的相关办公​​室和急诊和电话,孩子每天照顾或学校的情况下导致急性中耳炎,家长的学校或工作的情况下,因为他们的孩子的AOM ,治疗费用。主题被定义为失败(0-12天)或定期(13-30天),如果他们经历了较高的得分AOM的严重复审。 结果:共有223名受试者被招募:73%是白人,57%,<2岁,47%参加日间照顾,82%经历了之前的AOM,83%没有得到充分接种七价肺炎球菌疫苗。一二百一十二,随机于ABX,和111例随机到第一次世界大战。九十四%的受试者随访到30天的终点。AOM的关怀与家长满意是不是在任12天或30 2个治疗组之间的不同。与WW相比,1至10天症状评分更快地解决在即时于ABX治疗的受试者。在第12天,立即于ABX组之间,鼓膜膜的69%和25%,鼓室导抗图正常,与正常鼓膜的51%和10%的正常鼓室图在WW组。的ABX组儿童的父母给他们的孩子较少剂量的止痛药比在WW组儿童的父母。经历的ABX组受试者在WW组受试者比16%,故障少。在WW组的儿童中,66%完成,而无需于ABX的研究。立即于ABX导致肺炎链球菌运输消灭在广大儿童,但更有可能比在WW组儿童多药耐药的菌株培养来自于ABX组在12天的儿童肺炎链球菌株。更于ABX相关的不良事件的ABX组注意到,与二战组相比。在任一组,没有严重的急性中耳炎相关的不良事件观察。办公室和急诊室探访,电话,和天工作/上学错过了两组间没有不同。适用于ABX处方的ABX组相比减少了73%,在WW组。于ABX成本平均为47.41%美元的ABX组主题,在WW组的11.43美元。 结论:六十六%的受试者在WW组完成无于ABX的研究。家长满意度之间的群体,无论治疗相同。与WW相比,立即于ABX治疗与治疗失败和改善症状控制的数量减少,反而增加于ABX相关的不良事件和%马车更高的S在鼻咽部肺炎多药耐药株在12日访问。在实施二战战略的关键因素是(a)的方法进行分类AOM的严重性;(二)家长教育;(三)管理AOM的症状;(d)获得后续服务;及(e)使用一个有效的于ABX方案,在需要的时候。当观察这些告诫,二战可能是一些非严重急性中耳炎的儿童立即于ABX一个可接受的替代品。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
Year 2005
Loading references information
目标:“观望和等待”与眼前的初始治疗急性化脓性中耳炎的抗生素治疗方法方面继续辩论。在这项双盲非劣效性试验中,我们比较儿童在14天(6个月至5岁)被随机分配接受阿莫西林或安慰剂的急性化脓性中耳炎的临床改善率。 方法:我们参加了在渥太华举行的秋季和冬季个月(从1999年12月至2002年3月底)期间提出新的情节与急性中耳炎到诊所或急诊的健康儿童。这些儿童被随机分配接受10天的阿莫西林(60毫克/千克每天)或安慰剂。每1天,2和3之间的10天,14天一次进行电话随访。主要成果是临床症状,抗菌(阿莫西林治疗组以外)在任何时间在14天的时间内收到的情况下定义的决议。次要终点为疼痛和发烧的存在,并在第3天,复发率,并在1个月和3个月的中耳积液存在的活动水平。 结果:根据临床评分,415谁可以评估的512个孩子有温和的疾病。在14天接受安慰剂的儿童和84.2%,92.8%接受阿莫西林有临床症状的决议(绝对差异为-8.6%,95%置信区间为-14.4%-3.0%)。在第2天,谁接受安慰剂的儿童有更多的疼痛和发烧。有2组的不良事件之间没有差异,也不存在任何复发率显着差异或中耳积液在1和3个月。 释义:我们的研究结果并不支持这一假设安慰剂是劣阿莫西林(即14天治愈率与临床诊断为急性化脓性中耳炎的儿童不会在治疗组比安慰剂组显着恶化)。然而,贻误治疗与临床症状和大多数孩子的症状决议。

Publication Thread

Appelman and Claessen (provisional publication thread name)

This thread includes 3 references