Systematic reviews including this primary study

loading
3 articles (3 References) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Year 2018
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Since the 1950s antipsychotic medication has been extensively used to treat people with chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. These drugs, however, have also been associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Various strategies have been examined to reduce a person's cumulative exposure to antipsychotics. These strategies include dose reduction, intermittent dosing strategies such as drug holidays, and antipsychotic cessation. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a reduction or cessation of antipsychotic drugs is associated with a reduction in TD for people with schizophrenia (or other chronic mental illnesses) who have existing TD. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the use of specific antipsychotics for similar groups of people could be a treatment for TD that was already established. SEARCH METHODS: We updated previous searches of Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based Register of Trials including the registers of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We searched references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We also contacted authors of trials for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included reports if they assessed people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who had established antipsychotic-induced TD, and had been randomly allocated to (a) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic cessation (placebo or no intervention), (b) antipsychotic maintenance versus antipsychotic reduction (including intermittent strategies), (c) specific antipsychotics for the treatment of TD versus placebo or no intervention, and (d) specific antipsychotics versus other antipsychotics or versus any other drugs for the treatment of TD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data from these trials and estimated risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assumed that people who dropped out had no improvement. MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 RCTs with 711 participants; eight of these studies were newly included in this 2017 update. One trial is ongoing.There was low-quality evidence of a clear difference on no clinically important improvement in TD favouring switch to risperidone compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (1 RCT, 42 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.23 to 0.89, low-quality evidence). Because evidence was of very low quality for antipsychotic dose reduction versus antipsychotic maintenance (2 RCTs, 17 people, RR 0.42 95% CI 0.17 to 1.04, very low-quality evidence), and for switch to a new antipsychotic versus switch to another new antipsychotic (5 comparisons, 5 RCTs, 140 people, no meta-analysis, effects for all comparisons equivocal), we are uncertain about these effects. There was low-quality evidence of a significant difference on extrapyramidal symptoms: use of antiparkinsonism medication favouring switch to quetiapine compared with switch to haloperidol (1 RCT, 45 people, RR 0.45 CI 0.21 to 0.96, low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference for switch to risperidone or haloperidol compared with antipsychotic cessation (with placebo) (RR 1 RCT, 48 people, RR 2.08 95% CI 0.74 to 5.86, low-quality evidence) and switch to risperidone compared with switch to haloperidol (RR 1 RCT, 37 people, RR 0.68 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, very low-quality evidence).Trials also reported on secondary outcomes such as other TD symptom outcomes, other adverse events outcomes, mental state, and leaving the study early, but the quality of the evidence for all these outcomes was very low due mainly to small sample sizes, very wide 95% CIs, and risk of bias. No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life, outcomes that we designated as being important to patients. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited data from small studies using antipsychotic reduction or specific antipsychotic drugs as treatments for TD did not provide any convincing evidence of the value of these approaches. There is a need for larger trials of a longer duration to fully investigate this area.

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Dold M , Samara MT , Li C , Tardy M , Leucht S
期刊 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year 2015
Loading references information
本研究的目的是检测下颌角骨折(MAF)管理中标准和三维(3D)小板固定的临床结果是否有显着差异。没有日期和语言限制的电子搜索在2013年10月进行。入选标准是人类的研究,包括随机对照试验,对照临床试验和回顾性研究,目的是比较两种技术。包括六项研究。荟萃分析显示硬件故障发生率和术后三叉神经痛有统计学差异。术后感染,咬合不良,伤口开裂,非联合/畸形或感觉异常的发生率无明显差异。累积优势比为0.42,意味着3D微型板在MAF固定中的使用将事件(术后并发症)的风险降低了58%。与使用标准迷你板固定在MAF管理相比,该荟萃分析的结果显示使用3D迷你板固定术的术后并发症发生率较低。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year 2007
Loading references information
背景: Molindone在精神分裂症及嚴重精神疾患的使用抗精神病藥物是罹患精神分裂症患者的最主要治療,在最近幾年,新的抗精神病藥或非典型抗精神病藥開始被介紹使用。這些藥物有比較少產生動作疾病副作用及提高催乳激素血中濃度的可能。研究人員建議molindone應被歸類在非典型抗精神病藥。 目標: 為決定比較molindone與安慰劑、典型抗精神病藥及其他非典型抗精神病藥用在精神分裂症及相關精神病患者的治療效果 搜尋策略: 原始的搜尋,我們搜尋了下列的資料庫: Biological Abstracts (1980 – 1999), The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Issue 1, 1999), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (January 1999), CINAHL (1982 – 1999), EMBASE (1980 – 1999), MEDLINE (1966 – 1999), LILACS (1982 – 1999), PSYNDEX (1977 – 1999), and PsycLIT (1974 – 1999)。我們也在Dialog Corporation Datastar and Dialog的藥商資料庫搜尋及所有可辨試驗的相關參考文獻。最後,我們接觸molindone的製造商及任何相關試驗的作者。為更新這篇回顧,我們在2005年8月搜查的Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register 的試驗登記。 選擇標準: 我們納入所有比較molindone及其他治療,在治療精神分裂症及類似精神分裂症精神病的隨機控制試驗。 資料收集與分析: 我們獨立擷取資料,基於治療意向分析法,針對二分法資料,以固定效應計算相對風險(RR),其95%信賴區間(CI),及益需或害需治數(NNT或NNH)。我們把大於50%以上沒有後續追蹤的資料排除掉。 主要結論: 我們納入了14個研究,這些試驗最短的是10天,以針劑的形式,而最長的達到3個月。從整體性的評估測量,所得的資料並不能得出molindone及安慰劑效益上差異的結論。當與其他典型抗精神病藥物比較,我們沒有發現任何證據顯示其不同效益(醫師的4個隨機臨床試驗 n = 150, RR 1.13, CI 0.69 to 1.86; 護理的4個隨機臨床試驗 n = 146, RR 1.23, CI 0.82 to 1.86)。Molindone跟典型的藥物造成運動障礙的可能性差不多,但它確實造成顯著更多的體重減少(2個隨機臨床試驗 n = 60 RR 2.78, CI 1.10 to 6.99, NNH 5 CI 2 to 77)。 作者結論: 關於此合成物的證據強度因小數量的試驗個案,不佳的研究設計,有限的結果及不完整的報告所以是有限的。Molindone可能是一種有效的抗精神病藥物,但其副作用跟典型的抗精神病藥物並無顯著差異(除了體重減輕之外)。到目前從這篇回顧的資料,並沒有證據認為它可能具有非典型抗精神病藥物的特性。 翻譯人: 本摘要由彰化基督教醫院許文郁翻譯。此翻譯計畫由臺灣國家衛生研究院(National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan)統籌。 總結: Molindone是一種老的抗精神病藥物,它具有的受器結合特性和一種新型非典型抗精神病藥物quetiapine相似。我們設法去確認molindone和安慰劑、典型抗精神病藥、非典型精神病藥比較其在治療精神分裂症及相關精神病的效果。我們納入了14個隨機控制試驗,相對於其他典型抗精神病藥物,molindone在治療效果上沒有任何差異,造成運動障礙的可能性差不多,然而它有明顯更多的體重減輕。目前還沒有證據顯示它可能有非典型的特性。