Broad Syntheses that include this review

loading
3 articles (3 References) loading Revert Studify

Broad synthesis / Living FRISBEE

Unclassified

作者 Nitsche MP , Carreño M
期刊 Medwave
Year 2015
Loading references information
Acute otitis media is one of the most common infectious diseases diagnosed in children. Antibiotic treatment use remains controversial. This summary aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antibiotics in children with acute otitis media. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening 30 databases, we identified six systematic reviews including 18 randomized trials. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table following the GRADE approach. We concluded antibiotics reduce pain at 48-72 hours and reduce the risk of tympanic perforations in children with acute otitis media, but they do not reduce late recurrences and increase the risk of side effects (rash, vomiting and diarrhea).

Broad synthesis / Overview of systematic reviews

Unclassified

期刊 Clinical evidence
Year 2014
Loading references information
INTRODUCTION: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common reason for primary care visits in children. Yet, there is considerable debate on the most effective treatment. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments (analgesics, antibiotics, and myringotomy) in children with AOM? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to October 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 17 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: analgesics, antibiotics, delayed antibiotics, immediate antibiotics, longer courses of antibiotics, and myringotomy.

Broad synthesis / Overview of systematic reviews

Unclassified

作者 Arroll B
期刊 Respiratory medicine
Year 2005
Loading references information
目的:本文的目的是审查上呼吸道感染的抗生素四​​Cochrane评价。 方法:阅读是每个Cochrane回顾和总结,结果提出的胜算比(如在互联网上的版本),并在相关,数字需要治疗。 结果:急性中耳炎抗生素的审查已经结束的好处是不会很大的数字需要治疗的效益为15(NNTB)。最近美国指引建议在6个月以下的儿童在处方延迟。对于链球菌扁桃体炎,科克伦评论表明,抗生素的使用,似乎是酌情而不是禁止或强制。这是因为只有约16小时(从2到3天疼痛7 NNTB)与安慰剂相比,和严重的并发症,如风湿热,肾小球肾炎,是在症状方面的利益,现在在发达国家罕见。然而,审稿建议,考虑在其中,这些并发症是较常见的人群中抗生素。这是一个面积的辩论,美国传染病学会(2002)建议作为常规治​​疗。万方。感染。DIS。35(2002)113]有很好的证据和共识,为普通感冒抗生素是没有迹象。急性化脓性鼻炎的情况不太清楚,作为新的证据表明,抗生素可能有效的急性化脓性鼻炎(NNTB 6日至8)。然而,由于大多数人与急性化脓性鼻炎的改善无抗生素,使抗生素作为初始治疗是没有道理的。对于急性上颌窦炎,有证据表明,抗生素是有效的放射学证实鼻窦炎的人。评论建议,医生应权衡温和的好处(NNTB 3时至6)对潜在不利影响。 结论:急性中耳炎,喉咙痛和链球菌扁桃体炎,感冒和急性化脓性鼻炎,急性上颌窦炎的抗生素的使用,似乎非严重的情况下,至少要酌情而不是禁止或强制。