系統性回顧 related to this topic

loading
4 References (4 articles) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Liu L , Liu S , Wang C , Guan W , Zhang Y , Hu W , Zhang L , He Y , Lu J , Li T , Liu X , Xuan Y , Wang P
期刊 Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases
Year 2019
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for benefits and harms of folate (folic acid or folinic acid) supplementation on methotrexate (MTX) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to assess whether or not folate supplementation would reduce MTX toxicity or reduce MTX benefits, and to decide whether a higher MTX dosage is essential. METHODS: We performed a sensitive search strategy and searched systematically the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 2 June 2016. Abstracts from major rheumatology meetings and major trial registers were also searched to retrieve all randomized controlled trials that interested us. RESULTS: Seven studies with 709 patients were included. No significant heterogeneity was found between these trials. For RA patients treated with MTX, those supplied with folate were less likely to have elevated transaminase (odds ratio [OR] 0.15; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.10, 0.23 [P < 0.00001]) and gastrointestinal side-effects such as nausea and vomiting (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51, 0.99 [P = 0.04]). Folate appeared to promote compliance to MTX as it reduced patient withdrawal compared to placebo (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.21, 0.42 [P < 0.00001]). There was no statistical difference for mouth sores between folate and placebo (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.57, 1.22 [P = 0.35]). As the markers of disease activity in those trials were not consistent, it was impossible to decide whether folate supplementation reduced MTX efficacy. Besides, we compared high-dose folate (≥25 mg per week) and low-dose folate (≤10 mg per week) on MTX efficacy, finding no statistical difference (OR 2.07; 95% CI 0.81, 5.30 [P = 0.13]), nor on MTX toxicity (OR 1.56; 95% CI 0.80,3.04 [P = 0.19]). CONCLUSION: Folate supplementation can reduce the incidence of hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal side-effects of MTX in patients with RA. It can also reduce patient withdrawal from MTX treatment. Although it tended to reduce mouth sores, it had no statistical significance. No significant difference was found between high-dose folate and low-dose folate on MTX efficacy or toxicity.

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 The Journal of rheumatology
Year 2014
Loading references information
目标:根据现有的测量性质证据,提出关于“最佳”仪器的建议,以评估对骨关节炎自我管理的态度和/或能力。方法:在MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL和PsychINFO(自2016年12月27日开始)进行电子搜索。两名评审员使用基于共识的标准对卫生测量仪器(COSMIN)4点量表进行选择,独立评估测量属性。通过考虑测量属性结果的COSMIN等级和每种仪器的每个测量属性可用的证据水平来确定最佳证据综合。结果:5653份出版物中的8项研究符合纳入标准,其中有8项经评估的文献:评估多维度健康人控制,感知行为控制,患者激活措施,教育需求评估,骨关节炎变化阶段问卷,有效消费者规模和感知患者 - 医师互动中的功效五项(PEPPI-5)和十项量表。评估这些仪器的测量性质包括内部一致性(k = 8),结构有效性(k = 8),测试再测试可靠性(k = 2),测量误差(k = 1),假设检验(k = 3)文化有效性(k = 3)。没有关于内容有效性,响应性或最小重要变化/差异的信息。荷兰PEPPI-5展示了最佳测量属性证据;内部一致性和结构有效性的有力证据,但可靠性和构建有效性证据有限。结论:虽然PEPPI-5被认为具有最佳的测量属性,但总体而言,目前可获得的有关仪器测量属性的评估水平很差,以评估对骨关节炎自我管理的态度和/或能力。需要进一步精心设计的研究调查现有仪器的测量属性。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 The pharmacogenomics journal
Year 2013
Loading references information
两个关键变量映射协会MTHFR基因(C677T(rs1801133)和A1298C(rs1801131))与响应甲氨蝶呤(MTX)仍然是有争议的。我们调查这些和其他标记跨越基因作为MTX疗效和在英国的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者队列不良事件的预测因子,并用所有公布的数据进行了荟萃分析的两个关键变种。该标记单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)进行基因分型的309例明确定义的结果对MTX治疗和17项研究被纳入荟萃分析。与MTX疗效或毒性在我们的英国的队列中检测到测试的单核苷酸多态性无关联。与以往的研究通过meta分析结合我们的数据后,随机效应合并比值比(OR)为C677T和A1298C均与疗效或毒性没有关联无论是单核苷酸多态性(功效:OR = 1.05(95%可信区间( CI)0.83-1.32)和OR = 0.81(95%CI为0.53-1.24),分别毒性:OR = 1.38(95%CI为0.90-2.12)和OR = 1.19(95%CI为0.80-1.78),分别)。现有的证据表明,MTHFR基因C677T和A1298C基因多态性不响应MTX治疗的RA患者的可靠预测指标。

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Prey S , Paul C
期刊 The British journal of dermatology
Year 2009
背景:甲氨蝶呤是一种叶酸拮抗剂,广泛用于治疗炎症性疾病超过50年。甲氨蝶呤是一种严重的牛皮癣,类风湿关节炎的标准全身治疗。补充叶酸一直主张限制甲氨蝶呤血细胞,胃肠道和肝脏的毒性。但是,仍然存在争议的叶酸补充剂的效用。 目的:我们试图评估甲氨蝶呤治疗炎症性疾病的患者补充叶酸的功效证据。我们还调查是否补充叶酸可减少甲氨蝶呤的疗效。 方法:科克伦和MEDLINE数据库进行了系统的搜查。甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎或与关节炎或无牛皮癣患者的随机对照试验。由两个独立的研究人员进行了选择的研究,方法学质量评估,数据提取和分析。我们选择了双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。为每个分组副作用:胃肠道,皮肤粘膜,血液和肝进行分析。 结果:6个随机对照试验符合纳入标准,与总样本648例。在安慰剂组257例,198例叶酸治疗,并与亚叶酸治疗的193例患者。统计分析表明,35.8%由甲氨蝶呤诱导肝患者补充叶酸或亚叶酸(95%置信区间为-0.467至-0.248)的副作用显着减少。虽然是一个趋势,有利于补充皮肤粘膜和胃肠道副作用也没有统计学差异。补充血液副作用的影响,无法准确评估的人口研究这些事件的发生率较低。我们无法分析补充甲氨蝶呤成效的影响,作为活动的标志,在每个研究不具可比性。 结论:补充叶酸是一种有效的措施,以减少与甲氨蝶呤治疗肝不利影响。叶酸和叶酸之间没有区别,但后者降低成本,促进其使用。