Primary studies related to this topic

loading
15 References (15 articles) Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Efficacy of dronabinol alone and in combination with ondansetron versus ondansetron alone for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Journal Current medical research and opinion
Year 2007
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 10 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (10 references) 4 Broad syntheses Broad syntheses (4 references)

Loading references information
<b>OBJECTIVE: </b>To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dronabinol, ondansetron, or the combination for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in a 5-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.<b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: </b>Patients receiving moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy received dexamethasone (20 mg PO), ondansetron (16 mg IV) and either placebo or dronabinol (2.5 mg) prechemotherapy on day 1. Patients randomized to active treatment (dronabinol and/or ondansetron) also received dronabinol (2.5 mg) after chemotherapy on day 1. On day 2, fixed doses of placebo, dronabinol (10 mg), ondansetron (16 mg), or combination therapy were administered. On days 3-5, patients received placebo, flexible doses of dronabinol (10-20 mg), ondansetron (8-16 mg), or dronabinol and ondansetron (10-20 mg dronabinol, 8-16 mg ondansetron).<b>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: </b>Total response (TR = nausea intensity &lt;5 mm on visual analog scale, no vomiting/retching, no rescue antiemetic), nausea (occurrence and intensity) and vomiting/retching episodes.<b>RESULTS: </b>Sixty-four patients were randomized; 61 analyzed for efficacy. TR was similar with dronabinol (54%), ondansetron (58%), and combination therapy (47%) versus placebo (20%). Nausea absence was significantly greater in active treatment groups (dronabinol, 71%; ondansetron, 64%; combination therapy, 53%) versus placebo (15%; p &lt; 0.05 vs. placebo for all). Nausea intensity and vomiting/retching were lowest in patients treated with dronabinol. Active treatments were well tolerated. The low number of patients due to slow enrollment limits the interpretation of these data.<b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>Dronabinol or ondansetron was similarly effective for the treatment of CINV. Combination therapy with dronabinol and ondansetron was not more effective than either agent alone. Active treatments were well tolerated.

Primary study

Unclassified

Dronabinol and prochlorperazine in combination for treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Journal Journal of pain and symptom management
Year 1991
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 10 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (10 references) 3 Broad syntheses Broad syntheses (3 references)

Loading references information
Tested dronabinol (DAB) and prochlorperazine (PCZ) alone and in combination in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study. 62 patients (aged 20–68 yrs) were randomized to receive either (1) DAB 10 mg every 6 hrs plus placebo; (2) placebo plus PCZ 10 mg every 6 hrs; or (3) DAB and PCZ, each 10 mg every 6 hrs. Antiemetic treatment was begun 24 hrs before and continued for 24 hrs after the last dose of chemotherapy. Results confirm that patients respond better to a combination of DAB and PCZ than to PCZ alone. The combination was an effective antiemetic regimen when given with a variety of commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)

Primary study

Unclassified

Cancer Treatment & Marijuana Therapy

blocked
Authors Randall, R
Book Galen Press
Year 1990

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference) 1 Broad synthesis Broad syntheses (1 reference)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Cannabis therapeutic research program report to the California legislature. Annual Report to the Governor and Legislature

blocked
Report California State Reports Therapeutic Cannabis Program
Year 1989
Links druglibrary.net

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference) 1 Broad synthesis Broad syntheses (1 reference)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Inhalation marijuana as an antiemetic for cancer chemotherapy.

Journal New York state journal of medicine
Year 1988
Links Pubmed

This article is included in 4 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (4 references) 2 Broad syntheses Broad syntheses (2 references)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Oral vs. Inhaled Cannabinoids for Nausea/Vomiting from Cancer Chemotherapy. Report of the Lynn Pierson Therapeutic Research Program

blocked
Report Behavioral Health Sciences Division, Health and Environment Department: New Mexico.
Year 1984
Links druglibrary.net

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

The Lynn Pierson therapeutic research program: A report on progress to date

blocked
Report Behavioral Health Sciences Division. Health and Environment Department: New Mexico
Year 1983
Links medicalmarijuana.procon.org

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference) 1 Broad synthesis Broad syntheses (1 reference)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Evaluation of the use of both marijuana and THC in cancer patients for the relief of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy after failure of conventional anti-emetic therapy: Efficacy and toxicity

blocked
Authors Kutner, M
Journal Composite State Board of Medical Examiners, Georgia Department of Health
Year 1983

This article is included in 1 Systematic review Systematic reviews (1 reference) 1 Broad synthesis Broad syntheses (1 reference)

Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Cannabis and cancer chemotherapy: a comparison of oral delta-9-THC and prochlorperazine.

blocked
Journal Cancer
Year 1982
Links Pubmed DOI

This article is included in 12 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (12 references) 3 Broad syntheses Broad syntheses (3 references)

Loading references information
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and prochlorperazine (Compazine) were found to be equally efficacious in reducing nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy across a wide range of chemotherapeutic regimens and tumor types. Both drugs were administered orally one hour before chemotherapy, then every four hours for a total of four doses. Compazine was administered in a fixed dose of 10 mg; THC was administered by body surface area (BSA): BSA less than 1.4 m2 = 7.5 mg; BSA 1.4-1.8 m2 = 10- mg; and BSA greater than 1.8 m2 = 12.5 mg. Two hundred and fourteen subjects (75% of whom had previously received Compazine with varying results) were evaluated employing a double-blind, crossover design. Additional parameters evaluated were study drug effects on appetite, food intake, mood, activity, relaxation, interaction, and concentration. There were significant drug effects with THC.: less ability to concentrate (P less than 0.01), less social interaction (P less than 0.05), and less activity (P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two drugs in the level of food intake or appetite. Patients of all ages did equally well on both drugs. Neither past marijuana use nor past Compazine use were related to study the drug efficacy. Those patients who correctly identified their THC cycle did better on THC versus those who could not correctly identify which antiemetic they had received (P less than 0.05). There were more drug-related effects associated with THC, but these did not reduce the patients' preference for the drug, and were associated with nausea reduction (P less than 0.05).