PDRGUK (Parkinson's Disease Research Group in the United Kingdom)
ID: 59aec9046ec0d6255efdf3ae
6 Documents
Close
6 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

New approaches in the use of selegiline for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

blocked
Authors Lees AJ , Frankel J , Eatough V , Stern GM
Journal Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum
Year 1989
Links Pubmed
Loading references information
Selegiline hydrochloride (deprenyl) is a safe, useful adjuvant therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with L-dopa. The optimum time for its introduction into the treatment regimen of a patient remains controversial. A multicentre long-term study being conducted by the Parkinson's Disease Research Group of the United Kingdom to attempt to answer whether selegiline improves the natural history of Parkinson's disease is discussed. In a separate study we have been unable to demonstrate that higher doses of selegiline (up to 40 mg a day) produce additional therapeutic benefit above the conventional dose of 10 mg a day in levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations. Preliminary data from a neuropsychological study is also presented which suggests that selegiline may have beneficial effects on the speed of psychomotor responses supporting the anecdotal clinical observations of increased mental energy and alacrity.

Primary study

Unclassified

Comparisons of therapeutic effects of levodopa, levodopa and selegiline, and bromocriptine in patients with early, mild Parkinson's disease: three year interim report. Parkinson's Disease Research Group in the United Kingdom.

Authors [No authors listed]
Journal BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Year 1993
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum treatment for early Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: An open, long term, prospective randomised trial conducted by the Parkinson's Disease Research Group of the United Kingdom. SETTING: 93 hospitals throughout the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 782 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients allocated to treatment with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor alone (arm 1), levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor/selegiline in combination (arm 2), or bromocriptine (arm 3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability assessment as judged by improvement on Hoehn and Yahr, modified Webster, and North Western University disability scales. Adverse event profile and mortality ratios. RESULTS: Interim results indicate that all three treatment regimens led to improvement in baseline disabilities after 12 months' treatment and that deterioration in control was apparent by three years. No significant differences were found between the results of treatment in arm 1 and arm 2, but both were significantly more effective than bromocriptine (arm 3) and had fewer early adverse reactions. The adjusted difference (95% confidence interval) in Webster rating for arm 3 v 1 was 0.93 points (0.27 to 1.50; p = 0.0058) and for arm 3 v 2 was 1.25 points (0.61 to 1.89; p = 0.0002). The incidence of dyskinesias and motor oscillations, however, was significantly lower in arm 3 (2% and 5%, respectively) than in arm 1 (27% and 33%, respectively) and arm 2 (34% and 35%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: As there were no marked differences in functional improvement between the three groups the choice of treatment in the early stages of Parkinson's disease may not be critical.

Primary study

Unclassified

Comparison of therapeutic effects and mortality data of levodopa and levodopa combined with selegiline in patients with early, mild Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's Disease Research Group of the United Kingdom.

Authors Lees AJ
Journal BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Year 1995
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness of levodopa and levodopa combined with selegiline in treating early, mild Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Open, long term, prospective randomised trial. SETTING: 93 hospitals throughout United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 520 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with levodopa and dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (arm 1) or levodopa and decarboxylase inhibitor in combination with selegiline (arm 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments of serial disability, frequency and severity of adverse events, and deaths from all causes. RESULTS: After average of 5-6 years' follow up, mortality ratio in arm 2 compared with arm 1 was 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.30), and difference in survival between the two arms was significant (log rank test, P = 0.015). Hazard ratio adjusted for age and sex was 1.49 (1.02 to 2.16), and after adjustment for other baseline factors it increased to 1.57 (1.07 to 2.31). Patients in arm 1 had slightly worse disability scores than those in arm 2, but differences were not significant. Functionally disabling peak dose dyskinesias and on/off fluctuations were more frequent in arm 2 than arm 1. During the trial the dose of levodopa required to produce optimum motor control steadily increased in arm 1 (median daily dose 375 mg at 1 year and 625 mg at 4 years), but median dose in arm 2 did not change (375 mg). CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa in combination with selegiline seemed to confer no clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early, mild Parkinson's disease. Moreover mortality was significantly higher with combination treatment, casting doubts on its chronic use in Parkinson's disease.

Primary study

Unclassified

Investigation by Parkinson's Disease Research Group of United Kingdom into excess mortality seen with combined levodopa and selegiline treatment in patients with early, mild Parkinson's disease: further results of randomised trial and confidential inquiry.

Journal BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Year 1998
Links Pubmed DOI PubMed Central
Loading references information
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the excess mortality observed in patients who received both levodopa and selegiline in a randomised trial could be explained by revised diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, autonomic or cardiovascular effects, more rapid disease progression, or drug interactions. DESIGN: Open randomised trial and blind comparison and reclassification of the cause of death of patients who were recruited from 93 hospitals between 1985 and 1990 and who had died before December 1993 in arms 1 and 2. SETTING: United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 624 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were not receiving dopaminergic treatment and a subgroup fo 120 patients who died during the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Levodopa and a dopa carboxylase inhibitor (arm 1), levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor in combination with selegiline (arm 2), or bromocriptine alone (arm 3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All cause mortality for 520 subjects in arms 1 and 2 and for 104 subjects who were randomised into these arms from arm 3. Cause specific mortality for people who died in the original arms 1 and 2 on the basis of the opinion of a panel, revised diagnosis and disability ratings, evidence from clinical records of either autonomic or cardiovascular episodes, other clinical features before death, and drug interactions. RESULTS: After extended follow up (mean 6.8 years) until the end of September 1995, when arm 2 was terminated, the hazard ratio for arm 2 compared with arm 1 was 1.32 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.79). For subjects who were randomised from arm 3 the hazard ratio for arm 2 was 1.54 (0.83 to 2.87). When all subjects were included the hazard ratio was 1.33 (1.02 to 1.74) and after adjustment for other baseline factors it was 1.30 (0.99 to 1.72). The excess mortality seemed to be greatest in the third and fourth year of follow up. Cause specific death rates showed an excess of deaths from Parkinson's disease only (hazard ratio 2.5 (1.3 to 4.7)). No significant differences were found for revised diagnosis, disability rating scores, autonomic or cardiovascular events, other clinical features, or drug interactions. Patients who died in arm 2 were more likely to have had possible dementia and a history of falls before death compared with those who died in arm 1. CONCLUSION: The results consistently show excess mortality in patients treated with combined levodopa and selegiline. Revised diagnosis, autonomic or cardiovascular events, or drug interactions could not explain this finding, but falls and possible dementia were more common in arm 2. The results do not support combined treatment in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. In more advanced disease, combined treatment should perhaps be avoided in patients with postural hypotension, frequent falls, confusion, or dementia.

Primary study

Unclassified

Ten-year follow-up of three different initial treatments in de-novo PD: a randomized trial.

Journal Neurology
Year 2001
Links Pubmed DOI
Loading references information
<b>BACKGROUND: </b>The long-term effectiveness of three different initial drug regimes in patients with early, mild PD was evaluated by the PD Research Group of the United Kingdom (PDRGUK). In 1995, the selegiline arm of the trial was terminated following an interim analysis.<b>METHOD: </b>This was an open, randomized trial. Between 1985 and 1990, 782 patients with de-novo PD were recruited and randomized to one of three treatment arms: levodopa plus dopa decarboxylase inhibitor; levodopa plus decarboxylase inhibitor and selegiline; or bromocriptine. The main endpoints were mortality, disability, and adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was used.<b>RESULTS: </b>There was no significant difference in mortality between the bromocriptine and the levodopa arms (hazard ratio 1.15 [95% CI 0.90, 1.47]). Patients initially randomized to bromocriptine had slightly worse disability scores throughout follow-up. This difference was significant during the first years. Patients in the bromocriptine arm returned to pretreatment disability levels one year earlier than those in the levodopa arm. Patients randomized to bromocriptine had a significantly lower incidence of dyskinesias than those randomized to levodopa (rate ratio 0.73 [95% CI 0.57, 0.93]). However, this difference was not significant when only moderate to severe dyskinesias were considered. Patients in the bromocriptine arm had slightly lower rates of dystonias and on-off fluctuations, but moderate and severe forms were equally frequent in both arms.<b>CONCLUSION: </b>Starting treatment with the dopamine agonist bromocriptine does not reduce mortality in PD. A slightly lower incidence of motor complications is achieved at the expense of significantly worse disability scores throughout the first years of therapy.