BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mucosal healing, determined by histologic analysis, is a potential therapeutic target for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the histologic features of tissue normalization, as an outcome of treatment, have not been well described. We examined the prevalence and predictive values of normalization of the colonic mucosa, based on histologic analysis (histologic normalization) in patients with UC, and determined its association with risk of clinical relapse, compared with histologic disease quiescence and endoscopic mucosal healing.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 646 patients with confirmed UC who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center from August 2005 through October 2013. We reviewed reports from pathology analyses of random mucosal biopsies from each colon segment, and categorized them into 3 groups based on histology findings: (1) normalization (completely normal mucosa with no features of chronicity present), (2) quiescence (crypt atrophy or branching without signs of active inflammation including erosions, abscesses, or focal neutrophil infiltration), or (3) active disease (epithelial infiltration by neutrophils, crypt abscesses, erosions, or ulceration). Histology findings were compared with clinical and endoscopic findings. We assessed variables associated with histology findings and, in patients in clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score ≤2 and subscore of ≤1 for stool frequency or rectal bleeding), predictive values for clinical relapse at follow-up evaluations 6 months later or more were calculated.
RESULTS: Of the 646 patients included in the study, 60% had endoscopic mucosal healing, 40% had histologic quiescence, and 10% had histologic normalization. The level of agreement between mucosal and histologic activity was moderate (agreement for 68% of samples; κ = 0.50; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only proctitis associated with histologic normalization (P = .002). Of 310 patients in clinical remission at initial review, 25% had a clinical relapse, after a median time of 16 months (interquartile range, 10-23 months). Histologic normalization was independently associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with histologic quiescence (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-12.46; P = .007) and histologic activity (hazard ratio, 6.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.16-20.62; P = .001); mucosal healing was not associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with no mucosal healing (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.85; P = .954).
CONCLUSIONS: Histologic normalization of colonic mucosa can be used as a clinical endpoint for patients with UC. We associated histologic normalization with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with endoscopic healing or histologic quiescence. Further studies are needed to determine whether histologic normalization should be a goal of treatment for patients with UC.
OBJECTIVE: We developed a validated index for assessing histological disease activity in UC and established its responsiveness.
METHODS: Two hundred biopsies were scored. The outcome was the Global Visual Evaluation (GVE). Eight histological features were tested. The Nancy index was developed by multiple linear regression and bootstrap process to create an index that best matched the GVE. Goodness of fit was assessed by the adjusted R squared (adjusted R
RESULTS: After backward selection with bootstrap validation, 3/8 items were selected: ulceration (adjusted R
CONCLUSIONS: A three descriptor histological index has been validated for use in clinical practice and clinical trials.
<b>BACKGROUND: </b>Ozanimod (RPC1063) is an oral agonist of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5 that induces peripheral lymphocyte sequestration, potentially decreasing the number of activated lymphocytes circulating to the gastrointestinal tract.<b>METHODS: </b>We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ozanimod in 197 adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive ozanimod at a dose of 0.5 mg or 1 mg or placebo daily for up to 32 weeks. The Mayo Clinic score was used to measure disease activity on a scale from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease; subscores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The primary outcome was clinical remission (Mayo Clinic score ≤2, with no subscore >1) at 8 weeks.<b>RESULTS: </b>The primary outcome occurred in 16% of the patients who received 1 mg of ozanimod and in 14% of those who received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, as compared with 6% of those who received placebo (P=0.048 and P=0.14, respectively, for the comparison of the two doses of ozanimod with placebo). Differences in the primary outcome between the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod and the placebo group were not significant; therefore, the hierarchical testing plan deemed the analyses of secondary outcomes exploratory. Clinical response (decrease in Mayo Clinic score of ≥3 points and ≥30% and decrease in rectal-bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or a subscore ≤1) at 8 weeks occurred in 57% of those receiving 1 mg of ozanimod and 54% of those receiving 0.5 mg, as compared with 37% of those receiving placebo. At week 32, the rate of clinical remission was 21% in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod, 26% in the group that received 0.5 mg of ozanimod, and 6% in the group that received placebo; the rate of clinical response was 51%, 35%, and 20%, respectively. At week 8, absolute lymphocyte counts declined 49% from baseline in the group that received 1 mg of ozanimod and 32% from baseline in the group that received 0.5 mg. The most common adverse events overall were anemia and headache.<b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>In this preliminary trial, ozanimod at a daily dose of 1 mg resulted in a slightly higher rate of clinical remission of ulcerative colitis than placebo. The trial was not large enough or of sufficiently long duration to establish clinical efficacy or assess safety. (Funded by Receptos; TOUCHSTONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01647516.).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: AVX-470 is an oral, polyclonal bovine-derived anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibody in development for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AVX-470 neutralizes TNF locally in the gastrointestinal tract, minimizing systemic exposure. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human trial designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of 4 weeks of AVX-470 in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC).
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with active UC were randomized and 36 received AVX-470 (0.2, 1.6 or 3.5g/day) or placebo over 4 weeks. Endoscopic activity was assessed by colonoscopy pre- and post-treatment. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Clinical and endoscopic response and remission were assessed as exploratory endpoints.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (92%) patients completed treatment and follow-up. The incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups and no allergic reactions or opportunistic infections were reported. AVX-470 therapy did not induce human anti-bovine antibodies (HABA). Bovine immunoglobulin (Ig) with TNF binding capacity was detected in stool, while bovine Ig levels in serum were low. Across all AVX-470 doses, 25.9% of patients achieved clinical response compared with 11.1% on placebo, with greatest improvements in the 3.5g/day group associated with proximal colon endoscopic improvement and reductions in serum CRP and IL-6.
CONCLUSIONS: AVX-470 was safe and well tolerated in this first-in-human trial in UC, with efficacy trends for clinical, endoscopic and biomarker endpoints in the highest dose group (3.5g/day). Results suggest benefit of an orally delivered locally active agent in moderate to severe UC.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov as study NCT01759056 and with EudraCT as study 2012-004859-27.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Toll-like receptors [TLRs] are potential drug targets for immunomodulation. We determined the safety and efficacy of the TLR-9 agonist DNA-based immunomodulatory sequence 0150 [DIMS0150] in ulcerative colitis [UC] patients refractory to standard therapy.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 131 patients with moderate-to-severe active UC were randomized to receive two single doses of the oligonucleotide DIMS0150 [30 mg] or placebo administered topically during lower GI endoscopy at baseline and Week 4. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as Clinical Activity Index [CAI] ≤4, at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included mucosal healing and symptomatic remission of key patient-reported outcomes [absence of blood in stool and weekly stool frequency <35].
RESULTS: There was no statistical significant difference between the groups in the induction of clinical remission at Week 12, with 44.4% in the DIMS0150 group vs. 46.5% in the placebo group. However, the proportion of patients who achieved symptomatic remission was 32.1% in the DIMS0150 group vs. 14.0% in the placebo group at Week 4 [p = 0.020], and 44.4% vs. 27.9% at Week 8 [p = 0.061]. More patients on DIMS0150 compared with those on placebo had mucosal healing [34.6% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.09] and histological improvement regarding the Geboes score [30.9% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.0073] at Week 4. Significantly more patients on DIMS0150 were in clinical remission with mucosal healing at Week 4: 21% vs. 4.7% in the placebo group [p = 0.02]. DIMS0150 was well tolerated, and no safety signals compared with placebo were evident.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with the topically applied TLR-9 agonist DIMS0150 is a promising and well-tolerated novel therapeutic option for treatment-refractory, chronic active UC patients, warranting further clinical trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 [IP-10] mediates immune cell trafficking from the circulation to the inflamed colon and decreases gut epithelial cell survival. IP-10 expression is increased in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. We report efficacy and safety results from a dose-ranging induction study of eldelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to IP-10, in moderately to severely active UC.
METHODS: A total of 252 adults with UC [Mayo score ≥ 6 and endoscopic subscore ≥ 2] were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo or eldelumab 15 or 25 mg/kg administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 and every other week thereafter. The primary endpoint was clinical remission [Mayo score ≤ 2; no individual subscale score > 1] at Week 11. Key secondary endpoints included Mayo score clinical response and mucosal healing at Week 11.
RESULTS: Neither eldelumab 15 or 25 mg/kg resulted in significant increases vs placebo in the proportion of patients achieving Week 11 clinical remission. Remission and response rates were 17.6% and 47.1% with eldelumab 25mg/kg, 13.1% and 44.0% with eldelumab 15mg/kg, and 9.6% and 31.3% with placebo. Clinical remission and response rates were higher in anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-naïve patients treated with eldelumab compared with placebo. Eldelumab treatment was well tolerated and no immunogenicity was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint was not achieved with induction treatment with eldelumab 15 or 25 mg/kg in patients with UC. Trends towards clinical remission and response were observed in the overall population and were more pronounced in anti-TNF naïve patients. Eldelumab safety signals were consistent with those reported previously [ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01294410].
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Parenteral methotrexate is an effective treatment for patients with Crohn's disease, but has never been adequately evaluated in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine its safety and efficacy in patients with steroid-dependent UC.
METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of parenteral methotrexate (25 mg/wk) in 111 patients with corticosteroid-dependent UC at 26 medical centers in Europe from 2007 through 2013. Patients were given prednisone (10 to 40 mg/d) when the study began and were randomly assigned to groups (1:1) given placebo or methotrexate (intramuscularly or subcutaneously, 25 mg weekly) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was steroid-free remission (defined as a Mayo score ≤2 with no item >1 and complete withdrawal of steroids) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included clinical remission (defined as a Mayo clinical subscore ≤2 with no item >1) and endoscopic healing without steroids at weeks 16 and/or 24, remission without steroids at week 24, and remission at both weeks 16 and 24.
RESULTS: Steroid-free remission at week 16 was achieved by 19 of 60 patients given methotrexate (31.7%) and 10 of 51 patients given placebo (19.6%)--a difference of 12.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.0% to 28.1%; P = .15). The proportion of patients in steroid-free clinical remission at week 16 was 41.7% in the methotrexate group and 23.5% in the placebo group, for a difference of 18.1% (95% CI: 1.1% to 35.2%; P = .04). The proportions of patients with steroid-free endoscopic healing at week 16 were 35% in the methotrexate group and 25.5% in the placebo group--a difference of 9.5% (95% CI: -7.5% to 26.5%; P = .28). No differences were observed in other secondary end points. More patients receiving placebo discontinued the study because of adverse events (47.1%), mostly caused by UC, than patients receiving methotrexate (26.7%; P = .03). A higher proportion of patients in the methotrexate group had nausea and vomiting (21.7%) than in the placebo group (3.9%; P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial, parenteral methotrexate was not superior to placebo for induction of steroid-free remission in patients with UC. However, methotrexate induced clinical remission without steroids in a significantly larger percentage of patients, resulting in fewer withdrawals from therapy due to active UC. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00498589.
GOAL: To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose (3.5 mg/kg) infliximab for induction and maintenance treatment in Chinese patients with ulcerative colitis.
BACKGROUND: Treatment with 4 to 5 mg/kg of infliximab also proved to be effective in treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. At present there is no relevant study on the effectiveness of infliximab doses lower than 4 mg/kg in patients with ulcerative colitis.
STUDY: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and single-centered study was designed. A total of 123 patients (from 17 provinces of China) with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis despite treatment with concurrent drugs received placebo or low-dose (3.5 mg/kg) or standard-dose (5 mg/kg) infliximab intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks through week 22. Patients were followed up for 30 weeks.
RESULTS: Overall, 73% and 78% of patients who received low-dose (3.5 mg/kg) and standard-dose (5 mg/kg) infliximab, respectively, had clinical responses at week 8, as compared with 37% of patients who received placebo (P<0.01 for both comparisons with placebo). The number of patients who received low-dose (3.5 mg/kg) or standard-dose (5 mg/kg) infliximab with a clinical response at week 30 (63% and 66%, respectively) was more than the patients who received placebo (27%, P<0.01 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: Chinese patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis treated with low-dose (3.5 mg/kg) or standard-dose (5 mg/kg) infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter were more likely to have a clinical response at weeks 8 and 30 than those who received placebo.
Objective Interleukin-13 (IL-13) has been implicated as a key driver of UC. This trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab, an IL-13-neutralising antibody, as add-on therapy in adults with moderate-tosevere UC despite standard treatments. Design Non-hospitalised adults with UC (total Mayo score ≥6) were randomised to receive tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the rate of clinical response at week 8. Secondary efficacy end points included clinical remission and mucosal healing rates at week 8 and changes in total Mayo score, total modified Riley score, partial Mayo score and disease activity markers. Results Clinical response rate was 38% (21/56) for tralokinumab vs 33% (18/55) for placebo ( p=0.406). Clinical remission rate was 18% (10/56) vs 6% (3/55) (p=0.033) and mucosal healing rate was 32% (18/56) vs 20% (11/55) ( p=0.104) for tralokinumab vs placebo. Changes to week 8 in total Mayo score and total modified Riley score were similar for tralokinumab and placebo (least-squares mean difference between groups: -0.49 (p=0.394) and 0.25 ( p=0.449), respectively). Partial Mayo score at week 4 was lower with tralokinumab than placebo (least-squares mean difference between groups: -0.90 (p=0.041)). No consistent patterns were observed for disease activity markers. Tralokinumab had an acceptable safety profile. Conclusions Add-on therapy with tralokinumab did not significantly improve clinical response. However, the higher clinical remission rate with tralokinumab than placebo suggests that tralokinumab may benefit some patients with UC. Tralokinumab was well tolerated.
OBJETIVOS: Las dianas terapéuticas Selección de programa de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (STRIDE) fue iniciado por la Organización Internacional para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales (IOIBD). Se examinaron los posibles objetivos de tratamiento para la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) que se utilizará para una estrategia de gestión "tratar a destino" clínica mediante un proceso de consenso de expertos basada en la evidencia.
MÉTODOS: Un comité de dirección de 28 especialistas EII recomendaciones elaboradas sobre la base de una revisión sistemática de la literatura y la opinión de expertos. El consenso se obtuvo si ≥75% de los participantes obtuvo la recomendación 7-10 en una escala de calificación de 10 puntos (donde 10 = completamente de acuerdo).
RESULTADOS: El grupo acordadas 12 recomendaciones para la colitis ulcerosa (CU) y la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). El objetivo acordado para la UC era resultado la remisión clínica / informado por el paciente (PRO) (que se define como la resolución de la hemorragia rectal y diarrea / alteración del hábito intestinal) y la remisión endoscópica (definida como una calificación secundaria endoscópica de Mayo 0-1). la remisión histológica se consideró como un objetivo complementario. la remisión / PRO clínica también fue acordado como un objetivo para el CD y se define como la resolución del dolor abdominal y diarrea hábito intestinal / alterado; y la remisión endoscópica, que se define como la resolución de ulceración en ileocolonoscopia, o la resolución de los hallazgos de la inflamación en las imágenes de corte transversal en pacientes que no pueden evaluarse adecuadamente con ileocolonoscopia. la remisión de biomarcadores (proteína normal C-reactiva (CRP) y calprotectina) se consideró como un objetivo complementario.
CONCLUSIONES: Evidence y recomendaciones basadas en el consenso para la selección de los objetivos de las estrategias de tratamiento de desviación del objetivo en pacientes con EII se ponen a disposición. Se necesitan estudios prospectivos para determinar cómo estos objetivos cambiarán curso de la enfermedad y la calidad de vida de los pacientes.
Mucosal healing, determined by histologic analysis, is a potential therapeutic target for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the histologic features of tissue normalization, as an outcome of treatment, have not been well described. We examined the prevalence and predictive values of normalization of the colonic mucosa, based on histologic analysis (histologic normalization) in patients with UC, and determined its association with risk of clinical relapse, compared with histologic disease quiescence and endoscopic mucosal healing.
METHODS:
We performed a retrospective study of 646 patients with confirmed UC who underwent colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center from August 2005 through October 2013. We reviewed reports from pathology analyses of random mucosal biopsies from each colon segment, and categorized them into 3 groups based on histology findings: (1) normalization (completely normal mucosa with no features of chronicity present), (2) quiescence (crypt atrophy or branching without signs of active inflammation including erosions, abscesses, or focal neutrophil infiltration), or (3) active disease (epithelial infiltration by neutrophils, crypt abscesses, erosions, or ulceration). Histology findings were compared with clinical and endoscopic findings. We assessed variables associated with histology findings and, in patients in clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score ≤2 and subscore of ≤1 for stool frequency or rectal bleeding), predictive values for clinical relapse at follow-up evaluations 6 months later or more were calculated.
RESULTS:
Of the 646 patients included in the study, 60% had endoscopic mucosal healing, 40% had histologic quiescence, and 10% had histologic normalization. The level of agreement between mucosal and histologic activity was moderate (agreement for 68% of samples; κ = 0.50; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only proctitis associated with histologic normalization (P = .002). Of 310 patients in clinical remission at initial review, 25% had a clinical relapse, after a median time of 16 months (interquartile range, 10-23 months). Histologic normalization was independently associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with histologic quiescence (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-12.46; P = .007) and histologic activity (hazard ratio, 6.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.16-20.62; P = .001); mucosal healing was not associated with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with no mucosal healing (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.85; P = .954).
CONCLUSIONS:
Histologic normalization of colonic mucosa can be used as a clinical endpoint for patients with UC. We associated histologic normalization with increased odds of relapse-free survival compared with endoscopic healing or histologic quiescence. Further studies are needed to determine whether histologic normalization should be a goal of treatment for patients with UC.
