A, doble ciego, aleatorizado, de grupos paralelos para demostrar la equivalencia en la eficacia y la seguridad de CT-P13 en comparación con infliximab innovador cuando se coadministra con metotrexato en pacientes con artritis reumatoide activa: el estudio PLANETRA

Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaAnnals of the rheumatic diseases
Año 2013

Este artículo está incluido en 10 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (10 referencias)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
  • PLANETRA [Program evaLuating the Autoimmune Disease iNvEstigational Drug cT-p13 [infliximab biosimilar] in RA Patients] (13 documentos)
Este artículo es parte de las siguientes matrices de evidencia
Cargando información sobre las referencias

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the efficacy and safety of innovator infliximab (INX) and CT-P13, an INX biosimilar, in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) treatment.

METHODS:

Phase III randomised, double-blind, multicentre, multinational, parallel-group study. Patients with active disease despite MTX (12.5-25 mg/week) were randomised to receive 3 mg/kg of CT-P13 (n=302) or INX (n=304) with MTX and folic acid. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 30. Therapeutic equivalence of clinical response according to ACR20 criteria was concluded if the 95% CI for the treatment difference was within ±15%. Secondary endpoints included ACR response criteria, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, as well as pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, safety and immunogenicity.

RESULTS:

At week 30, ACR20 responses were 60.9% for CT-P13 and 58.6% for INX (95% CI -6% to 10%) in the intention-to-treat population. The proportions in CT-P13 and INX groups achieving good or moderate EULAR responses (C reactive protein (CRP)) at week 30 were 85.8% and 87.1%, respectively. Low disease activity or remission according to DAS28-CRP, ACR-EULAR remission rates, ACR50/ACR70 responses and all other PK and PD endpoints were highly similar at week 30. Incidence of drug-related adverse events (35.2% vs 35.9%) and detection of antidrug antibodies (48.4% vs 48.2%) were highly similar for CT-P13 and INX, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

CT-P13 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to INX at week 30, with a comparable PK profile and immunogenicity. CT-P13 was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of INX. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER:

NCT01217086.
Epistemonikos ID: 1ca91f82996a682d42db63342e0b13d3aa025c7f
First added on: Sep 24, 2014