Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

Autores
Categoría Revisión sistemática
RevistaAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Año 2011
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Recently published randomized trials examining skin closure technique on postcesarean wound complications have produced conflicting results. We performed a metaanalysis of trials comparing staples and subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean section (CS). Pooled outcome measures were calculated using random effects models. Primary outcomes were rates of wound dehiscence (separation) and a composite wound complication rate. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, operating time, and postoperative pain. A total of 877 women from 5 trials were included. Both wound separation (pooled odds ratio, 4.01; P < .0001) and composite wound complication (pooled odds ratio, 2.11; P = .003) rates were higher with staples. The use of staples reduced operating time (weighted mean difference, -5.05 minutes; P = .021). Data on postoperative pain and patient satisfaction were insufficient for metaanalysis. Our findings suggest a possible benefit with subcuticular sutures compared to skin staples for skin closure at CS. However, the optimal skin closure technique at CS demands further study.
Epistemonikos ID: 1faeacb9481d0d974f07ec9d82a4cc50f3659a21
First added on: Oct 29, 2012