Effects of wound closure on wound healing in gynecologic surgery: a systematic literature review.

Categoría Revisión sistemática
RevistaJournal of Reproductive Medicine
Año 2009

Sin referencias

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Síntesis amplia 0 Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
A systematic review was undertaken using the Cochrane and PubMed databases to answer the question of how wound closure affects wound healing after gynecologic surgery. Leaving the vaginal vault open after vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy is as safe as closing it. When closing the vaginal vault, there is no difference between sutures and staples. Nonclosure of the peritoneum is a safe method after vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. After laparotomy there is no difference between continuous and interrupted sutures regarding wound infection and/or dehiscence. After vertical midline incisions it is possible to close Camper's fascia, use drainage or close the skin only. The overall wound complication rate after laparoscopic surgery is lower when using transcutaneous as compared to subcuticular sutures. Adhesive paper tapes save time when closing smaller skin incisions. In conclusion, specific wound closure techniques improve wound healing after gynecologic operations.
Epistemonikos ID: 338bb7aa6bf705ab8be5990bdd0cc5371cfaead4
First added on: Jan 30, 2015