OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (Jakinibs) in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of Jakinibs in treating psoriasis and PsA from inception to July 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to estimate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Seventeen clinical trials (16 publications) comprising 6802 patients were included. All Jakinibs demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared with placebo (ACR20: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.90-2.30; PASI75: RR 4.03, 95% CI 3.13-5.18). Within the subgroup analysis, the response rates defined by ACR20 were highest for filgotinib (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.67-3.45), followed by upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib. The proportion of patients achieving PASI75 response in the tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily group was significantly higher than that in the tofacitinib 5 mg group. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was significantly higher for Jakinibs compared with placebo (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.23). Of note, a considerable increase in the risk of infections including upper respiratory tract and herpes zoster infection was observed among patients in the treatment group. For tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotiniband, infection was the most prevalent AE. Moreover, AEs in the 10 mg tofacitinib group were higher than those in the 5 mg tofacitinib group.
CONCLUSION: Jakinibs are efficacious interventions for the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, but they are associated with an increased risk of AEs when compared with placebo. The long-term efficacy and safety data require further evaluation. Key Points • This systematic review investigated and compared the efficacy and safety of different Jakinibs including the novel selective TYK2 inhibitors. • Jakinibs are efficacious interventions for the treatment of psoriasis and PsA. • A relatively higher dosing schedule of Jakinibs is associated with increased toxicity.
BACKGROUND: Despite the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has considerably expanded over the last thirty years, additional drugs are needed to improve care of this disease. JAK inhibitors (JAKinhibs) are small molecules able to interfere with the JAK/STAT pathway, involved in the pathogenesis of PsA. Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib were recently approved for the treatment of PsA. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for the treatment of PsA.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify RCTs by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database until April 2021. RCTs were considered eligible if included only patients with PsA treated with JAKinhibs. The pooled efficacy and safety outcomes were calculated by meta-analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic.
RESULTS: Five RCTs for a total of 3293 PsA patients treated with different JAKinhibs or placebo were included (2 phase III studies on Tofacitinib, 1 phase II study on Filgotinib and 2 phase III studies on Upadacitinib). All the studies were judged at low risk of bias according to Cochrane criteria. JAKinhibs showed a significantly higher ACR20 response rate compared to placebo (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.72-5.24, I^2 = 57%, random effect model).and were associated with a non-statistically significant higher risk of serious adverse events (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.14-2.82, I^2 = 46%, random effect model).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review that performed a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for PsA in RCTs. Our analysis suggests a statistically significant benefit of JAKinhibs that appear to be effective and safe over placebo for the treatment of PsA.
INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic approaches for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) include non-pharmacologic therapies, symptomatic treatments, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin, and Janus kinase inhibitors. This systematic review aimed to provide complete and up-to-date information on efficacy of tofacitinib in the treatment of PsA, giving special attention to non-skin manifestations (peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis).
METHODS: A search of studies published between January 2016 and June 2020 was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar.
RESULTS: The number of studies with tofacitinib in PsA is limited and most of them are post hoc analyses from OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond. Tofacitinib has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of all disease manifestations in PsA. Superior effectivity to placebo is achieved at the earliest time point evaluated, and maintained over time. Patients who switch from placebo to tofacitinib show the same improvements; however, the time to initial response is faster in patients who firstly receive tofacitinib, compared with those switching subsequently. Additional data suggest that tofacitinib may be also effective for the treatment of the axial domain.
CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of peripheral and axial involvement, enthesitis, and dactylitis manifestation in PsA. Further prospective and long-term studies are required to corroborate and complete the present results. Similarly, real-world evidence is also necessary to complement the information obtained in clinical trials, and thereby to have a better overview of real efficacy and safety of the drug.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: As the well-acknowledged autoimmune disease, Janus kinase (JAK) is thought to play important roles in the progression of tissue injury in spondyloarthropathy. From a current perspective, JAK inhibitors could be applied to both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Nonetheless, it is reasonable to doubt whether PsA and AS differentially respond to JAK inhibitors.
METHODS: Different databases were searched for full-text publication based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. For data-pooling, a fixed-effect model was applied if heterogeneity was not detected. All results of the analysis were illustrated as forest plots. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's adjusted rank correlation test. The standard mean difference (SMD) was calculated in continuous variables. The pooled odds ratio was calculated in categorical variables.
RESULTS: Nine clinical studies were finally included with a 3-month follow-up. The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors were comprehensively investigated. JAK inhibitors were proved to be effectively improving disease condition within 3 months (12 weeks) in both PsA and AS. Besides, psoriasis-related dermal lesions could also be improved by JAK inhibitors. Dose-dependent effects suggested that higher dose tofacitinib could bring not only a higher level of treatment response but also more safety concerns.
CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors were proved to be effective in improving arthritis symptoms and enhancing the quality of life in both PsA and AS patients. Compared with AS, JAK inhibitors seemed to perform better in PsA treatment. However, the frequency of adverse events PsA and AS in comparison with the placebo group showed no difference. Higher dose of tofacitinib could attain better treatment response without increasing adverse events in short-term follow-up.
KEY POINTS: • JAK inhibitors were proved to be effective in improving arthritis symptoms and enhancing the quality of life in both PsA and AS patients. • Compared with AS, JAK inhibitors seemed to perform better in PsA treatment. • The frequency of adverse events PsA and AS in comparison with the placebo group showed no difference. • Higher dose of tofacitinib could attain better treatment response without increasing adverse events in short-term follow-up.
• This is the first paper that systematically appraised the clinical trial discrimination properties for PF-PROMs in PsA. • Data for appraisal of clinical trial discrimination were available for only four PF-PROMs (HAQ-DI, HAQ-S, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 PF). • The HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS demonstrated clinical trial discrimination with low risk of bias. • Clinical trial discrimination with SF-36 PF and HAQ-S are supported with caution. More studies are needed for SF-36 PF and HAQ-S. Physical function (PF) is a core domain to be measured in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), yet the discriminative performance of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for PF in RCTs has not been evaluated systematically. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the clinical trial discrimination of PF-PROMs in PsA RCTs. We searched PubMed and Scopus databases in English to identify all original RCTs on biological and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) conducted in PsA. We assessed quality in each article using the OMERACT good method checklist. Effect sizes (ES) for the PF-PROMs were calculated and appraised using a priori hypotheses. Evidence supporting clinical trial discrimination for each PF-PROM was summarized to derive recommendations. 35 articles from 31 RCTs were included. Four PF-PROMs had data for evaluation: HAQ-Disability Index (DI), HAQ-Spondyloarthritis (S), and Short Form 36-item Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) and Physical Functioning domain (SF-36 PF). As anticipated, higher ES values were observed for intervention groups than the control groups. Across all studies, for HAQ-DI, the median ES were -0.73 and -0.24 for intervention and control groups, respectively. Whereas for SF-36 PCS, the median ES were 0.77 and 0.23. For intervention and control groups, respectively. Clinical trial discrimination was supported for HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS in PsA with low risk of bias; and for SF-36 PF and HAQ-S with some caution. More studies are required for HAQ-S.
OBJECTIVES: Review of efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs).
METHODS: A systematic literature research (SLR) of all publications on JAK inhibitors (JAKi) treatment published until March 2019 using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Efficacy and safety were assessed in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), integrating long-term extension periods additionally for safety evaluation.
RESULTS: 3454 abstracts were screened with 85 included in the final analysis (efficacy and RCT safety: n=72; safety only: n=13). Efficacy of RCTs investigating tofacitinib (TOFA, n=27), baricitinib (BARI, n=9), upadacitinib (UPA, n=14), filgotinib (FILGO, n=7), decernotinib (DEC, n=3) and peficitinib (PEF, n=7) was evaluated. Six head-to-head trials comparing JAKi with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were included. Efficacy of JAKi was shown in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for all agents, psoriatic arthritis (TOFA, FILGO), ankylosing spondylitis (TOFA, FILGO), systemic lupus erythematosus (BARI), chronic plaque psoriasis (TOFA, BARI, PEF), ulcerative colitis (TOFA, UPA), Crohn's disease (UPA, FILGO) and atopic dermatitis (TOFA, BARI, UPA). Safety analysis of 72 RCTs, one cohort study and 12 articles on long-term extension studies showed increased risks for infections, especially herpes zoster, serious infections and numerically higher rates of venous thromboembolic events. No increased malignancy rates or major adverse cardiac events were observed.
CONCLUSION: JAKi provide good efficacy compared to placebo (and to TNFi in RA and Pso) across various IMIDs with an acceptable safety profile. This SLR informed the task force on points to consider for the treatment of IMIDs with JAKi with the available evidence.
OBJECTIVE: To perform an update of a review of the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: This is a systematic literature research of 2015-2018 publications on all DMARDs in patients with PsA, searching Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Efficacy was assessed in randomised controlled trials. For safety, cohort studies, case-control studies and long-term extensions (LTEs) were analysed.
RESULTS: 56 publications (efficacy: n=33; safety n=23) were analysed. The articles were on tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (n=6; golimumab, etanercept and biosimilars), interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors (n=10; ixekizumab, secukinumab), IL-23-p19 inhibitors (n=2; guselkumab, risankizumab), clazakizumab (IL-6 inhibitor), abatacept (CD80/86 inhibitor) and ABT-122 (anti-TNF/IL-17A), respectively. One study compared ustekinumab (IL-12/23i) with TNF inhibitor therapy in patients with entheseal disease. Three articles investigated DMARD tapering. Trials on targeted synthetic DMARDs investigated apremilast (phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi; tofacitinib, filgotinib). Biosimilar comparison with bio-originator showed non-inferiority. Safety was evaluated in 13 LTEs, 9 cohort studies and 1 case-control study investigating malignancies, infections, infusion reactions, multiple sclerosis and major cardiovascular events, as well as efficacy and safety of vaccination. No new safety signals were identified; however, warnings on the risk of venous thromboembolic events including pulmonary embolism when using JAKi were issued by regulators based on other studies.
CONCLUSION: Many drugs in PsA are available and have demonstrated efficacy against placebo. Efficacy varies across PsA manifestations. Safety must also be taken into account. This review informed the development of the European League Against Rheumatism 2019 updated PsA management recommendations.
Background: Tofacitinib and other new treatments approved for use in psoriatic arthritis have only recently been included in psoriatic arthritis treatment guidelines, and studies evaluating the relative efficacy of available therapies are important to inform treatment decisions by healthcare professionals. Objective: To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of tofacitinib, biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis naïve to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy (TNFi-naïve) or with an inadequate response (TNFi-IR). Methods: A systematic literature review used searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library on October 9, 2017. Randomized controlled trials including adult patients with psoriatic arthritis receiving treatment administered as monotherapy or with conventional synthetic DMARDs were selected. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20 response, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and change from baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score and Leeds Enthesitis Index. Treatment effects were evaluated during placebo-controlled phases, using a binomial logit model for binary outcomes and a normal identify link model for other outcomes. Discontinuations due to adverse events and serious infection events were assessed as safety outcomes. Results: The network meta-analysis included 24 published randomized controlled trials, of which 13 enrolled TNFi-naïve patients only, 3 enrolled TNFi-IR patients only, and 8 enrolled both TNFi-naïve and TNFi-IR patients. Placebo-controlled treatment durations ranged from 12 to 24 weeks. Indirect comparisons showed tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID to have similar efficacy compared with most bDMARDs and apremilast in improving joint symptoms (based on American College of Rheumatology 20 response), and with some bDMARDs in improving skin symptoms (based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) (tofacitinib 10 mg BID only in TNFi-IR) in patients with psoriatic arthritis who were TNFi-naïve or TNFi-IR. Results also showed that, compared with placebo, the improvement in physical functioning (based on Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID was similar to that observed with most bDMARDs and apremilast in TNFi-naïve patients, and similar to that observed with all bDMARDs with available data in the TNFi-IR population. Improvements in Dactylitis Severity Score and Leeds Enthesitis Index scores were comparable between treatments. Tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were median-ranked 8 and 15, respectively, for discontinuation due to any adverse events, and 5 and 16, respectively, for a serious infection event out of a total of 20 treatments in the network (lower numbers are more favorable). Conclusions: Tofacitinib provides an additional treatment option for patients with psoriatic arthritis, both in patients naïve to TNFi and in those with TNFi-IR. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX–XXX)
