Golimumab, un ser humano contra el factor de necrosis tumoral alfa anticuerpos monoclonales, se inyecta por vía subcutánea cada cuatro semanas en los pacientes naive a metotrexato con artritis reumatoide activa: veinticuatro semanas de los resultados de un ensayo en Fase III, multicéntrico, aleatorizado, doble-ciego, placebo estudio controlado de golimumab antes de metotrexato como terapia de primera línea para el inicio temprano la artritis reumatoide.

Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaArthritis and rheumatism
Año 2009

Este artículo está incluido en 32 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (32 referencias) 2 Síntesis amplias Síntesis amplias (2 referencias)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
  • GO-BEFORE [Golimumab Before Employing Methotrexate as the First-Line Option in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset] (9 documentos)
Este artículo es parte de las siguientes matrices de evidencia
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. MTX-naive patients with RA (n = 637) were randomized to receive placebo plus MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg plus placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg plus MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg plus MTX (group 4). Subcutaneous injections of golimumab or placebo were administered every 4 weeks. The dosage of MTX/placebo capsules started at 10 mg/week and escalated to 20 mg/week. The primary end point, the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR50 response) at week 24, required significant differences between groups 3 and 4 combined (combined group) versus group 1 and significant differences in a pairwise comparison (group 3 or group 4 versus group 1). Results. An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of the ACR50 response at week 24 did not show a significant difference between the combined group and group 1 (38.4% and 29.4%, respectively; P = 0.053), while a post hoc modified ITT analysis (excluding 3 untreated patients) of the ACR50 response showed statistically significant differences between the combined group and group 1 (38.5% versus 29.4%; P = 0.049) and between group 3 (40.5%; P = 0.038) but not group 4 (36.5%; P = 0.177) and group 1. Group 2 was noninferior to group 1 for the ACR50 response at week 24 (33.1%; 95% confidence interval lower bound -5.2%; predefined delta value for noninferiority -10%). The combination of golimumab plus MTX demonstrated a significantly better response compared with placebo plus MTX in most other efficacy parameters, including response/remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints. Serious adverse events occurred in 7%, 3%, 6%, and 6% of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Conclusion. Although the primary end point was not met, the modified ITT analysis of the primary end point and other prespecified efficacy measures demonstrated that the efficacy of golimumab plus MTX is better than, and the efficacy of golimumab alone is similar to, the efficacy of MTX alone in reducing RA signs and symptoms in MTX-naive patients, with no unexpected safety concerns. © 2009, American College of Rheumatology.
Epistemonikos ID: 632d04f9e9e4697217061cbe21f01808e5f0998d
First added on: Jun 08, 2011