A randomized controlled trial of oxygen therapy in acute myocardial infarction Air Verses Oxygen In myocarDial infarction study (AVOID Study).

Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaAmerican heart journal
Año 2012

Este artículo está incluido en 2 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (2 referencias) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
  • AVOID [Air Versus Oxygen In myocarDial infarction] (8 documentos)
Este artículo es parte de las siguientes matrices de evidencia
Cargando información sobre las referencias

BACKGROUND:

The role of routine supplemental oxygen for patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has recently been questioned. There is conflicting data on the possible effects of hyperoxia on ischemic myocardium. The few clinical trials examining the role of oxygen in AMI were performed prior to the modern approach of emergent reperfusion and advanced medical management.

METHODS:

Air Verses Oxygen In myocarDial infarction study (AVOID Study) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial conducted by Ambulance Victoria and participating metropolitan Melbourne hospitals with primary percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities. The purpose of the study is to determine whether withholding routine supplemental oxygen therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction but without hypoxia prior to reperfusion decreases myocardial infarct size. AVOID will enroll 490 patients, >18 years of age with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction of less than 12 hours duration.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is an urgent need for clinical trials examining the role of oxygen in AMI. AVOID will seek to clarify this important issue. Results from this study may have widespread implications on the treatment of AMI and the use of oxygen in both the pre-hospital and hospital settings.
Epistemonikos ID: 643354c8658e54e4699eca38b7d1fdb3932f72c9
First added on: Nov 21, 2016