Comparación de la eficacia de tenofovir en pacientes infectados por el VIH sin tratamiento previo: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis.

Categoría Revisión sistemática
RevistaHIV clinical trials
Año 2015
Cargando información sobre las referencias

INTRODUCTION:

Benefits and harms of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in HIV-infected, antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve patients of any age have not been systematically reviewed since recent milestone trials were published.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCI, LILACS, WHO GHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TDF-based treatments with any other ART-regimen (last search 01/2015). Trial characteristics and results were extracted, risks of bias systematically assessed, and treatment effects synthesized in meta-analyses using random-effects models.

RESULTS:

We included 22 RCTs (8297 patients). We found no differences between groups for mortality, AIDS, fractures, CD4 cell count, and virological failure; and inconclusive information due to inadequate reporting for cardiovascular events, renal failure, proteinuria, rash, and quality of life. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens significantly reduced total cholesterol (mean difference - 18.42 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 22.80 to - 14.0), LDL-cholesterol ( - 9.53 mg/dl; - 12.16 to - 6.89), HDL-cholesterol ( - 2.97 mg/dl; - 4.41 to - 1.53), and triglycerides ( - 29.77 mg/dl; - 38.61 to - 20.92), bone mineral density (BMD) (hip: - 1.41%; - 1.87 to - 0.94), and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ( - 3.47 ml/minute; - 5.89 to - 1.06) over 48 weeks of follow-up. Effects were similar in trials comparing fixed-dose TDF/FTC-based regimens with ABC/3TC-based regimens. We found no influence of baseline viral load on virological failure.

DISCUSSION:

Moderate-quality evidence suggests similar effects of TDF-based treatment regimens and other ART on virological failure. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens are associated with a more favorable lipid profile, but with increased risk of reduced BMD and eGFR. Improved reporting quality is vital to allow assessment of clinical outcomes in future trials.
Epistemonikos ID: 6700d8935cc424d1237515bd5e0654faa4c5a694
First added on: Sep 26, 2015