Lack of early change in disease activity score predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at month 6: Tofacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate in methotrexate-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Aún no traducido Aún no traducido
Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Año 2016

Este artículo no está incluido en ninguna revisión sistemática

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Background: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment guidelines recommend targeting remission or low disease activity (LDA), herein defined as Disease Activity Scores ≤3.2 based on 28 joint counts (DAS28≤3.2) and adjusting therapy after 3-6 months1 (Mos). Predicting the likelihood of clinical response may help inform early treatment decisions. Objectives: To understand the relationship between timing and magnitude of early changes in DAS28, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) and the likelihood of achieving LDA at Mo 6 in RA patients (pts) naïve to methotrexate (MTX). Methods: In a Phase 3 study (ORAL Start; NCT01039688), MTX-naïve RA pts were randomised 2:2:1 to the following monotherapies: tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID or MTX. Conditional probability of pts achieving LDA at Mo 6 were calculated, given failure to achieve DAS28-4(ESR) improvement from baseline (range ≥0.3 to 1.8) at Mo 1 or 3. One-year data with non-responder imputation for missing values was used. Results: 948 pts received treatment; tofacitinib 5 mg BID (n=370), tofacitinib 10 mg BID (n=394) or MTX (n=184); results previously reported.2 In this post-hoc analysis, of those patients who failed to achieve DAS28-4(ESR) improvement from baseline ≥1.2 at Mo 3, 6.8% for tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 11.3% for tofacitinib 10 mg BID and 6.2% for MTX achieved LDA at Mo 6 (Table). A minority of pts (74/353 [20.9%]) receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID failed to achieve DAS28-4(ESR) improvement ≥1.2 from baseline at Mo 3, while a greater proportion failed for MTX (65/171 [38.0%]). Failure to achieve DAS28-4(ESR) improvement from baseline at Mo 3 (range ≥0.30-1.8) for tofacitinib 5 mg BID and MTX was associated with a low probability (≤10%) of achieving LDA at Mo 6. For tofacitinib 5 mg BID, failure to achieve lower thresholds of DAS28-4(ESR) improvement (range ≥0.3 to 0.9) at Mo 1 was associated with lower probability of LDA at Mo 6 than higher DAS28-4(ESR) thresholds (≥1.2-1.8) (Table). Conclusions: Failure to achieve DAS28-4(ESR) improvement ≥1.2 from baseline at Mo 3 was associated with a low probability of achieving LDA at Mo 6 (≤6.8%) for tofacitinib 5 mg BID and MTX. For the minority of MTX-naïve RA pts treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID or MTX who failed to achieve a minimal clinical response (DAS28-4[ESR] improvement ≥1.2) by Mo 3, another treatment option can be considered at Mo 3, as there is a low probability of reaching LDA at Mo 6. (Table Presented).
Epistemonikos ID: 6fbf2030786c5de173444c6274420f9f40d43678
First added on: Mar 24, 2022