INTRODUCTION: Fistulas are a debilitating complication of Crohn's disease and treatment options remain limited. There is a lack of head-to-head comparisons between treatments. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis on the efficacy of medical therapies in achieving fistula remission and maintenance of fistula closure in Crohn's disease.
METHODS: Biomedical databases and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched between 1978 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on treatments. A network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist model with pooled relative risks (RRs) and P-scores used to rank treatments.
RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs were included for analysis with 2239 patients included. At the 16-24 week time point, infliximab produced the only statistically significant result with the 5 mg/kg dose proving the most effective [RR, 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-3.77]. At 44 weeks, ustekinumab was found to be most superior with it being 2.38 times (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.24-4.56) more superior to placebo, with adalimumab (RR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.06-3.99) and infliximab 5 mg/kg (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.03-2.75) also producing a statistically significant result.
CONCLUSION: Despite infliximab being favoured in international guidelines for the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, biologics such as ustekinumab, vedolizumab and adalimumab show promising results.
BACKGROUND: Starting biologic treatment early in the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may associate with higher efficacy, especially in Crohn's disease (CD).
METHODS: A systematic review and individual-patient-data meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled trials of biologics approved for IBD at study inception (Oct 2015), using Vivli data-sharing platform. The primary outcome was the proportional biologic/placebo treatment effect on induction-of-remission in patients with short-duration (≤18months) versus long-duration disease (>18months) analyzed separately for CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). We used meta-regression to examine the impact of patients' characteristics on the primary outcome. Study PROSPERO registration: CRD42018041961.
RESULTS: We included 25 trials, testing infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, natalizumab or vedolizumab (6,168 CD, 3,227 UC patients). In CD, induction-of-remission rates were higher in pooled placebo and active arms' patients with short-disease duration≤18 months (41.4%, 244/589) compared with disease-duration>18months (29.8%, 852/2857, meta-analytically estimated OR=1.33, 95%CI:1.09-1.64). The primary outcome, proportional biologic/placebo treatment effect on induction-of-remission, was not different in short-duration disease ≤18 months (n= 589, OR 1.47, 95%CI:1.01-2.15) compared with longer disease-duration (n=2857, OR 1.43, 95%CI:1.19-1.72). In UC trials, both the proportional biologic/placebo remission-induction effect and the pooled biologic-placebo effect were stable regardless of disease duration. Primary outcome results remained unchanged when tested using alternative temporal cut-offs and when modelled for individual-patients' co-variates, including prior anti-TNFs exposure.
CONCLUSION: There are higher rates of induction-of-remission with biologics and with placebo in early CD, resulting in a treatment-to-placebo effect ratio which is similar across disease durations. No such relationships between disease-duration and outcomes is found in UC.
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a disease with an impaired immune response characterized by chronic, relapsing-remitting, and progressive inflammation mainly affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a biological agent that regulates the impaired immune response by controlling tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα). However, the efficacy and safety of long-term administration of CZP for people with CD with inflammation under control are not well understood.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of CZP for maintenance of remission in people with CD.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and conference abstracts from inception to 23 March 2022. We contacted pharmaceutical companies involved with the production of CZP for further relevant information.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CZP with placebo in adults with CD.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. The main outcomes were failure to maintain clinical remission at week 26, failure to maintain clinical response at week 26, and serious adverse events. We planned to perform meta-analyses including all available studies if similar enough for pooling to be appropriate and calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. We analyzed the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) and the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) to indicate the magnitude of treatment effects. The same two review authors independently evaluated the risk of bias by using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework.
MAIN RESULTS: We identified one study meeting our prespecified eligibility criteria. The included study enrolled 428 adults with CD who responded to induction therapy with CZP 400 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 4. The study evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of CZP administered subcutaneously every four weeks compared with placebo. The proportion of participants who failed to maintain clinical remission at week 26 was 52.3% (113/216) in the CZP group compared to 71.7% (152/212) in the placebo group. Treatment of CZP probably results in a large reduction in failure to maintain clinical remission at week 26 (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.85). The NNTB was 5 (95% CI 4 to 9). We judged this outcome at low risk of bias. Using the GRADE assessment, we judged the certainty of evidence as moderate due to the low number of events occurred. The proportion of participants who failed to maintain clinical response at week 26 was 37.5% (81/216) in the CZP group compared to 64.2% (136/212) in the placebo group. Treatment of CZP probably results in a large reduction in failure to maintain clinical response at week 26 (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.71). The NNTB was 4 (95% CI 3 to 5). We judged this outcome at low risk of bias. Using the GRADE assessment, we judged the certainty of evidence as moderate due to the low number of events occurred. The proportion of participants who developed serious adverse events was 5.6% (12/216) in the CZP group compared to 6.6% (14/212) in the placebo group. Treatment of CZP may lead to no difference in serious adverse events compared to placebo when used as a remission maintenance treatment (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.78). The NNTB was 95 (95% CI NNTH 19 to NNTB 25). We evaluated the risk of bias for this outcome as low. We evaluated the certainty of evidence as low due to the low number of events occurred and the CIs were not sufficiently narrow.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: CZP probably results in a large reduction in failure to maintain clinical remission and response at week 26 in people with CD. The evidence suggests that CZP may lead to no difference in serious adverse events compared to placebo when used as a remission maintenance treatment. However, the current studies are limited to 26 weeks of follow-up and only included adults. Therefore, these conclusions cannot be used to guide longer term treatment or for treatment in children at present.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether concomitant therapy with corticosteroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents is more effective at inducing remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) than anti-TNF monotherapy. We aimed to determine whether patients with active CD receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents had higher rates of clinical improvement than patients not receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy.
METHODS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases, through January 20, 2016, for randomized trials of anti-TNF agents approved for treatment of CD and identified 14 trials (5 of adalimumab, 5 of certolizumab, and 4 of infliximab). We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of individual patient and aggregated data from these trials. We compared data from participants who continued oral corticosteroids during induction with anti-TNF therapy to those treated with anti-TNF agents alone. The endpoints were clinical remission (CD activity index [CDAI] scores <150) and clinical response (a decrease in CDAI of 100 points) at the end of induction (weeks 4-14 of treatment).
RESULTS: We included 4354 patients who received induction therapy with anti-TNF agents, including 1653 [38.0%] who were receiving corticosteroids. The combination of corticosteroids and an anti-TNF agent induced clinical remission in 32.0% of patients, whereas anti-TNF monotherapy induced clinical remission in 35.5% of patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74-1.17). The combination of corticosteroids and an anti-TNF agent induced a clinical response in 42.7% of patients, whereas anti-TNF monotherapy induced a clinical response in 46.8% (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96). These findings did not change with adjustment for baseline CDAI scores and concurrent use of immunomodulators.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on a meta-analysis of data from randomized trials of anti-TNF therapies in patients with active CD, patients receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents did not have higher rates of clinical improvement compared with patients not receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy. Given these findings and the risks of corticosteroid use, clinicians should consider early weaning of corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents for patients with corticosteroid-refractory CD.
Background: Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects quality of life. There are several drugs available for the treatment of CD, but their relative efficacy is unknown due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head randomized controlled trials. Aim: To perform a mixed comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors for CD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to Dec. 28, 2020. Only RCTs that compared the efficacy or safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors with placebo or another active agent for CD were included in the comparative analysis. Efficacy outcomes were the induction of remission, maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission, and safety outcomes were serious adverse events (AEs) and infections. The Bayesian method was utilized to compare the treatments. The registration number is CRD42020187807. Results: Twenty-eight studies and 29 RCTs were identified in our systematic review. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that infliximab and adalimumab were superior to certolizumab pegol (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.35–4.97; OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.57–5.40, respectively) and tofacitinib (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.27–5.97; OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47–6.52, respectively) and revealed the superiority of CT-P13 compared with placebo (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.31–7.59) for the induction of remission. Infliximab (OR 7.49, 95% CI 1.85–34.77), adalimumab (OR 10.76, 95% CI 2.61–52.35), certolizumab pegol (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.10–21.08), vedolizumab (OR 4.99, 95% CI 1.19–25.54) and CT-P13 (OR 10.93, 95% CI 2.10–64.37) were superior to filgotinib for the maintenance of remission. Moreover, infliximab (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.49–10.23), adalimumab (OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.43–16.95), vedolizumab (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.21–6.52) and CT-P13 (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.05–27.58) were superior to placebo for steroid-free remission. Among all treatments, adalimumab ranked highest for the induction of remission, and CT-P13 ranked highest for the maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission. Conclusion: CT-P13 was more efficacious than numerous biological agents and JAK1 inhibitors and should be recommended for the treatment of CD. Further head-to-head RCTs are warranted to compare these drugs.
Background: Fatigue is a common and burdensome symptom experienced by individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subjective, complex nature of fatigue can often hamper its’ management, and the effectiveness of treatments for fatigue in IBD remains unknown. The aim of this Cochrane review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for managing fatigue in IBD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted up to July 2018, and the search was rerun in October 2019. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in children or adults with IBD, where fatigue was assessed as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Data were extracted and study quality was independently assessed by two authors. Standard Cochrane methodological procedures were used. Results: Fourteen RCTs were included (3741 participants; all adults; 6 in Crohn’s disease (CD); 2 in ulcerative colitis (UC); 6 in both CD and UC), with five potentially relevant studies identified from the updated search (to be assessed for inclusion at the next update). The interventions varied widely and included nine pharmacological trials, four non-pharmacological trials, and one multimodular trial. Only four trials were designed specifically as interventions for managing fatigue and one meta-analysis was possible, due to the diversity and limited number of studies for each intervention. We found that adalimumab 40mg administered every other week (only for those known to respond to adalimumab induction therapy), self-directed stress management and physical activity advice may reduce fatigue but the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence suggest ferric maltol results in a slight increase in fatigue and electroacupuncture may result in a large reduction in fatigue and increase in quality of life. There is no evidence of effect for adalimumab maintenance therapy, adalimumab administered 40mg weekly, agaricus blazei murill-based mushroom extract, omega 3, guided stress management or cognitive behavioural therapy that is likely to have a clinically meaningful improvement on fatigue. Reporting in some of the trials was insufficient to assess the efficacy and safety of some therapies, including vitamin D3 supplementation, ferumoxytol, vedolizumab, tight control customised management and solution focused therapy. Conclusions: The effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on fatigue in individuals with IBD are uncertain. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions, as there is insufficient quantity and quality of evidence available. Further RCTs with larger number of participants are required to assess the potential benefits and harms of therapies, particularly interventions specifically designed for fatigue management.
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, and immune response modulation is the main treatment strategy to induce remission in active CD. Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) inhibitor which regulates impaired immune response.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CZP for the induction of remission in CD.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, the Cochrane IBD group specialized register, trials registers and other sources from inception to 28 January 2019. Moreover, we contacted the pharmaceutical company that manufactures CZP.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing CZP with placebo or no treatment in active CD patients.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The main outcomes selected for GRADE analysis were clinical remission at week 8 (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] ≤150), clinical response at week 8 (CDAI reduction ≥ 100 or clinical remission), and serious adverse events. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method was applied for the statistical analyses. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
MAIN RESULTS: Four studies involving 1485 participants with moderate to severe CD met the inclusion criteria and were used in the meta-analyses. All studies included active CD patients with CDAI ranging from 220 to 450. Most patients were adults over 18 years of age. One study was identified as high risk of bias due to a non-identical placebo while the other studies were judged to be at low risk of bias.CZP (100 mg to 400 mg every 2 to 4 weeks) was shown to be superior to placebo for achieving clinical remission at week 8 (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66; moderate certainty evidence). The raw numbers of participants achieving clinical remission at week 8 were 26.9% (225/835) and 19.8% (129/650) in the CZP and the placebo groups, respectively.CZP was shown to be superior to placebo for achieving clinical response at week 8 (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.53; moderate certainty evidence). In raw numbers, clinical response at week 8 was achieved in 40.2% (336/835) and 30.9% (201/650) of participants in the CZP and the placebo groups, respectively.In raw numbers, serious adverse events were observed in 8.7% (73/835) and 6.2% (40/650) of participants in the CZP and the placebo groups, respectively (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.97; moderate certainty evidence). Serious adverse events included worsening Crohn's disease, infections, and malignancy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate certainty evidence suggests that CZP is effective for induction of clinical remission and clinical response in participants with active CD patients. It is uncertain whether the risk of serious adverse events differs between CZP and placebo as the 95% CI includes the possibility of a small decrease or doubling of events. Future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of CZP in CD patients.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fistulas are debilitating complications of Crohn's disease (CD) that affect up to 50% of patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of treatments for fistulizing CD.
METHODS: We searched publication databases from inception through December 13, 2016 for trials comparing the efficacy of a therapeutic agent (single or combination) with placebo or another active therapy in adult patients with any form of fistulizing CD. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of trials; the overall quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of fistula response and remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 27 trials; most studies (21/27) focused on patients with perianal fistulizing CD. We found moderate-quality evidence to support the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.36-2.97), particularly infliximab, ustekinumab (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.93-3.37), and mesenchymal stem cell therapy (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.73) for induction of fistula remission. We found low-quality evidence for the efficacy of vedolizumab and immunosuppressives. There was also low-quality evidence to support the efficacy of combination therapy with TNF antagonists and antibiotics vs a TNF antagonist alone.
CONCLUSION: In a systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 controlled trials, we found TNF antagonists to be effective for induction and maintenance of perianal fistula response and remission. There are few data on the effects on internal fistulae. Further studies are needed, particularly for ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and stem cell therapies, in patients with fistulizing CD.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endpoints in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Crohn's disease (CD) are evolving. We performed a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes reported in placebo-controlled RCTs of patients with CD.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to March 1, 2017 for placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with CD treated with aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, corticosteroids, biologics, and oral small molecules. Efficacy and safety outcomes, definitions, and measurement tools were collected and stratified by decade of publication.
RESULTS: 116 RCTs (81 induction, 44 maintenance, 7 postoperative prevention trials, enrolling 27,263 patients) were included. Clinical efficacy endpoints were reported in all trials, most commonly measured using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index. Thirty-eight unique definitions of clinical response or remission and 32 definitions of loss of response were identified. Definitions of endoscopic response, remission, and endoscopic healing were also heterogeneous, evaluated using the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, ulcer resolution, and Rutgeerts' Score for post-operative endoscopic appearance. Histologic outcomes were reported in 11.1%, 2.3%, and 14.3% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively. Biomarker outcomes were reported in 81.5%, 68.2%, and 42.9% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively. Safety outcomes were reported in 93.8%, 97.7%, and 85.7% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we highlight the heterogeneity in definitions of response and remission and the evolution of outcomes reported in placebo-controlled CD RCTs. Establishing a core outcome set to standardize efficacy and safety endpoint definitions is a research priority in this field.
Background and Aim. Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract with the potential to progress to a severe debilitating state. Treatment with biological agents is highly efficient, improving both short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis. Nonetheless, up to 60% of patients receiving biological therapy will exhibit nonresponse at some point. The optimal management of such patients is not clearly defined. Besides traditional anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab), alternative biological therapies (natalizumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab) are currently available for the treatment of CD. Our aim was to analyze all available evidence regarding efficacy of a second biological in "biological-treatment-experienced" patients. Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using specific criteria for selecting relevant randomized clinical trials evaluating response to administration of secondary biological therapy in "anti-TNF-experienced" CD patients. Data from these studies was used to perform (a) traditional meta-analysis to ascertain the effect of secondary treatment versus placebo and (b) network meta-analysis to compare indirectly the efficacy of available biological agents. Results. Out of initially 977 studies, only eight were included for analysis, providing a total of 1281 treated and 733 placebo-receiving CD patients. Treatment with a second biological was found to be superior to placebo for both induction of remission (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.7 to 3) and response (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.5), with global rates of 24% and 42%, respectively (placebo rate: 11% and 27%, p<0.0001 for both). Indirect comparisons performed with network meta-analysis suggest no specific agent is clearly superior to others, with relatively better results observed for adalimumab in inducing disease remission. Conclusion. In anti-TNF-experienced CD patients, secondary biological administration may be efficient, while no specific agent seems to outperform the others. Further research is needed to identify optimal management strategies for this challenging subset of patients.
Fistulas are a debilitating complication of Crohn's disease and treatment options remain limited. There is a lack of head-to-head comparisons between treatments. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis on the efficacy of medical therapies in achieving fistula remission and maintenance of fistula closure in Crohn's disease.
METHODS:
Biomedical databases and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched between 1978 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on treatments. A network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist model with pooled relative risks (RRs) and P-scores used to rank treatments.
RESULTS:
Twenty-five RCTs were included for analysis with 2239 patients included. At the 16-24 week time point, infliximab produced the only statistically significant result with the 5 mg/kg dose proving the most effective [RR, 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-3.77]. At 44 weeks, ustekinumab was found to be most superior with it being 2.38 times (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.24-4.56) more superior to placebo, with adalimumab (RR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.06-3.99) and infliximab 5 mg/kg (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.03-2.75) also producing a statistically significant result.
CONCLUSION:
Despite infliximab being favoured in international guidelines for the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, biologics such as ustekinumab, vedolizumab and adalimumab show promising results.
