Evidence-Based Review Of Pharmacotherapy For Acute Agitation. Part 2: Safety.

Aún no traducido Aún no traducido
Autores
Categoría Revisión sistemática
RevistaThe Journal of emergency medicine
Año 2018

Este artículo incluye 35 Estudios primarios 35 Estudios primarios (35 referencias)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
Cargando información sobre las referencias

BACKGROUND:

The management of acute agitation in the emergency department often requires the administration of rapid-acting antipsychotic agents. However, there are few comparative studies and little guidance regarding the risks associated with use of such drugs in the acute setting.

, OBJECTIVE:

This structured evidence-based review compared the safety of antipsychotic pharmacotherapies for acute agitation using data from randomized controlled trials identified by a literature search of the PubMed database.

, RESULTS:

Based on findings from 34 blinded, randomized controlled trials, common acute adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol were headache, dizziness, insomnia, and somnolence. There were some differences in incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), degree of sedation, and acute QTc prolongations between agents.

, CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this review demonstrate the improved safety (particularly regarding EPS and over-sedation) of certain newer-generation antipsychotic agents compared with haloperidol and benzodiazepines for the treatment of acutely agitated patients. The risk of prolonged QT interval and torsade de pointes needs to be considered with haloperidol and some of the second-generation antipsychotics. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Epistemonikos ID: 9199dd3de3a76fac14ed4154ae21458035eff4d2
First added on: Feb 14, 2018