Candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) and resource utilization and costs in Italy.

Aún no traducido Aún no traducido
Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaVascular health and risk management
Año 2008

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
  • CHARM Added [Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity- Added] (19 documentos)
  • CHARM-Alternative [Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity- Alternative] (19 documentos)
  • CHARM-Preserved [Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity- Preserved] (19 documentos)
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality particularly in the elderly and a growing healthcare burden in Italy. The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of candesartan cilexetil, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) for the treatment of HF. A pre-specified economic evaluation was conducted on resource utilization (cardiovascular drug treatment, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular hospital admission, cardiovascular procedures/operations) prospectively collected alongside the CHARM program, a series of parallel randomized clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo (standard therapy) in patients with NYHA Class II-IV HF.: CHARM-Alternative (LVEF < or =40% patients not receiving ACE inhibitors because of previous intolerance); CHARM-Added (LVEF < or =40% patients currently receiving ACE inhibitors); or CHARM-Preserved (LVEF > or =40% patients). The primary outcome for the component trials was the composite of cardiovascular death or worsening hospital admission for HF and of the overall program all-cause mortality. Adjunctive treatment with candesartan in CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Added led to clinical benefits and to either cost-savings or a small additional cost, depending on the trial. The less certain clinical benefit in CHARM-Preserved was obtained at modest extra cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated to range from euro713 per life year gained for CHARM-Alternative to dominant for CHARM-Added and the pooled reduced LVEF trials.
Epistemonikos ID: aeb98dbf3a5281dbc791997e527a42ca2cb943d0
First added on: Aug 28, 2023