Preferencia del paciente por placebo, el acetaminofeno (paracetamol) o los estudios de eficacia de celecoxib (PACES): dos estudios aleatorizados, doble ciego, controlado, los ensayos cruzados clínicos en pacientes con osteoartritis de rodilla o cadera.

Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaAnnals of the rheumatic diseases
Año 2004

Este artículo está incluido en 18 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (18 referencias)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
  • PACES-b [Placebo, Acetaminophen or Celecoxib Efficacy Studies] (1 documentos)
  • PACES-a [Placebo, Acetaminophen or Celecoxib Efficacy Studies] (1 documentos)
Este artículo es parte de las siguientes matrices de evidencia
Cargando información sobre las referencias

BACKGROUND:

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is recommended as the initial pharmacological treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis. However, survey and clinical trial data indicate greater efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 specific inhibitors.

DESIGN:

Two randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover multicentre clinical trials, Patient Preference for Placebo, Acetaminophen or Celecoxib Efficacy Studies (PACES).Patients: Osteoarthritis of knee or hip.Intervention: "Wash out" of treatment; randomisation; 6 weeks of celecoxib 200 mg/day, acetaminophen 1000 mg four times a day, or placebo; second "wash out;" crossover to 6 weeks of second treatment.Measurements: Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue pain scale, patient preference between two treatments.

RESULTS:

Celecoxib was more efficacious than acetaminophen in both periods in both studies; WOMAC and pain scale scores differed at p<0.05 in period II and both periods combined of PACES-a and in periods I and II and both periods combined in PACES-b, but not in period I of PACES-a. Acetaminophen was more efficacious than placebo, generally p<0.05 in PACES-b, and >0.05 in PACES-a. Patient preferences were 53% celecoxib v 24% acetaminophen in PACES-a (p<0.001) and 50% v 32% in PACES-b (p = 0.009); 37% acetaminophen v 28% placebo in PACES-a (p = 0.340) and 48% v 24% in PACES-b (p = 0.007). No clinically or statistically significant differences were seen in adverse events or tolerability among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Greater efficacy was seen for celecoxib v acetaminophen v placebo, while adverse events and tolerability were similar. Variation in results and statistical significance in the two different trials are of interest.
Epistemonikos ID: b16d461f65f8133b21c83e476f10c60bd4b7a4d9
First added on: Jul 25, 2011