BACKGROUND AND AIM: An accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is critical for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) have recently been proposed to diagnose liver fibrosis. To determine the optimal noninvasive method for diagnosing fibrosis in CHB, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the performance of 2D-SWE and MRE for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with CHB.
METHODS: Literature databases were searched until January 1st 2021. Three measures, the summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratios, and the summary sensitivities and specificities, were used to assess the performance of 2D-SWE and MRE for detecting liver fibrosis.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 5126 CHB patients were included. The summary sensitivities and specificities of 2D-SWE and MRE were 82% and 81%, 91% and 94%, respectively, for detecting significant fibrosis, 88% and 85%, 93% and 93%, respectively, for detecting advanced fibrosis, and 89% and 87%, 92% and 92%, respectively, for detecting cirrhosis. The AUSROC value of MRE (0.97) in predicting significant fibrosis was significantly higher than those of 2D-SWE (0.88, P < 0.001). The AUSROC values of 2D-SWE and MRE were 0.93 and 0.98, respectively, for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, and 0.94 and 0.97, respectively, for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.
CONCLUSIONS: MRE and 2D-SWE are excellent tools for staging fibrosis in patients with CHB. MRE probably exhibit the better diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant fibrosis as compared to 2D-SWE.
BACKGROUND: : Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) and King's score have been proposed for diagnosing liver fibrosis.
METHODS: Literature databases were searched until October 1st, 2020. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratios, and the summary sensitivities and specificities were used to assess the diagnostic performance of these non-invasive methods for staging fibrosis.
RESULTS: : Our final data contained 72 studies. The overall mean prevalence of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 58.3%, 36.2% and 20.5%, respectively, in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. For imaging techniques (2D-SWE and MRE), the summary AUROCs were 0.89 and 0.97, 0.95 and 0.97, and 0.94 and 0.97 for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. The summary AUROCs using APRI and FIB-4 for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.76 and 0.75, 0.74 and 0.77, 0.77 and 0.82, respectively. The summary AUROCs of King's score for detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.77 and 0.83, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRE and 2D-SWE may show the best diagnostic accuracy for predicting fibrosis in CHB. Among the three serum markers, King's score may be more useful for diagnosing fibrosis.
PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic performance and cutoff value of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D SWE) for detecting significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and Web of Science was conducted. Bivariate modelling and summary receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) modelling were constructed to summarize the diagnostic performance of 2D SWE. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies with 2623 patients were included. 2D SWE showed a summary sensitivity of 88 % (95 % CI: 83-91), specificity of 83 % (95 % CI: 78-88) and area under the ROC curve of 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.89-0.94) for detecting significant fibrosis in CHB patients. The mean threshold of 2D SWE was 7.91 kPa (range: 6.73-10.00 kPa). Notably, the cutoffs of studies excluding patients with history of prior antiviral therapy were generally lower than that of studies without excluding those who had received antiviral treatment, with an average of 7.15 kPa and 8.87 kPa, respectively (p < 0.01). Meta-regression analysis revealed that enrollment of consecutive patients was the only significant factor influencing heterogeneity (p < 0.01). Specifically, studies recruiting consecutive patients with CHB had significantly lower sensitivity than those with absence of consecutive enrolment (0.83 vs 0.92, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: 2D SWE is an excellent modality for predicting significant liver fibrosis in CHB populations. Further work is required to establish the cutoffs that account for antiviral treatment as a potential confounding factor.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive biomarkers have been developed to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) related fibrosis owing to the significant limitations of liver biopsy. Both serum biomarkers and imaging techniques have shown promising results and may improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic effects of various imaging techniques on fibrosis in all chronic liver diseases.
AIM: To compare the performance of common imaging methods and serum biomarkers for prediction of significant fibrosis caused only by HBV infection.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on the records available in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases until December 2018. We systematically assessed the effectiveness of two serum biomarkers and three imagine techniques in predicting significant fibrosis solely caused by HBV infection. The serum biomarkers included aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). The three imaging techniques included acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), FibroScan, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Three parameters, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary sensitivity and specificity, were used to examine the accuracy of all tests for liver fibrosis.
RESULTS: Out of 2831 articles evaluated for eligibility, 204 satisfied the predetermined inclusion criteria for this current meta-analysis. Eventually, our final data contained 81 studies. The AUSROCs of serum biomarkers of APRI and FIB-4 were both 0.75. For imaging techniques (ARFI, FibroScan, and MRE), the areas were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. The heterogeneities of ARFI and FibroScan were statistically significant (I2 > 50%). The publication bias was not observed in any of the serum biomarkers or imaging methods.
CONCLUSION: These five methods have attained an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy. Imaging techniques, MRE in particular, demonstrate significant advantages in accurately predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, while serum biomarkers are admissible methods.
An accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is critical for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) have recently been proposed to diagnose liver fibrosis. To determine the optimal noninvasive method for diagnosing fibrosis in CHB, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the performance of 2D-SWE and MRE for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with CHB.
METHODS:
Literature databases were searched until January 1st 2021. Three measures, the summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratios, and the summary sensitivities and specificities, were used to assess the performance of 2D-SWE and MRE for detecting liver fibrosis.
RESULTS:
Twenty-four studies with 5126 CHB patients were included. The summary sensitivities and specificities of 2D-SWE and MRE were 82% and 81%, 91% and 94%, respectively, for detecting significant fibrosis, 88% and 85%, 93% and 93%, respectively, for detecting advanced fibrosis, and 89% and 87%, 92% and 92%, respectively, for detecting cirrhosis. The AUSROC value of MRE (0.97) in predicting significant fibrosis was significantly higher than those of 2D-SWE (0.88, P < 0.001). The AUSROC values of 2D-SWE and MRE were 0.93 and 0.98, respectively, for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, and 0.94 and 0.97, respectively, for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.
CONCLUSIONS:
MRE and 2D-SWE are excellent tools for staging fibrosis in patients with CHB. MRE probably exhibit the better diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant fibrosis as compared to 2D-SWE.
